From 3eabfe66a9302f074789fc0deb03117b487de98a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@ens-rennes.fr>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:33:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that I don't 'fix' it by accident in the future

---
 .../simdag/evaluate-get-route-time/evaluate-get-route-time.c    | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/teshsuite/simdag/evaluate-get-route-time/evaluate-get-route-time.c b/teshsuite/simdag/evaluate-get-route-time/evaluate-get-route-time.c
index ff86f3af60..6ce4fd946d 100644
--- a/teshsuite/simdag/evaluate-get-route-time/evaluate-get-route-time.c
+++ b/teshsuite/simdag/evaluate-get-route-time/evaluate-get-route-time.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
   xbt_assert(host_count > 1);
   i = rand() % host_count;
   j = rand() % (host_count - 1);
-  if (j >= i)
+  if (j >= i) // '>=' is not a bug: j is uniform on host_count-1 values, and shifted on need to maintain uniform random
     j++;
 
   const_sg_host_t h1 = hosts[i];
-- 
2.20.1