new

[GMRES2stage.git] / IJHPCN / paper.tex

diff --git a/IJHPCN/paper.tex b/IJHPCN/paper.tex
index 0c88f29130f5ef43679aa87243ee3f33e53f7b13..3aa76dee5624bc5986ac40d389c0a0f6db14ae1f 100644 (file)
--- a/IJHPCN/paper.tex
+++ b/IJHPCN/paper.tex
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ Table~\ref{tab:01}.  These  latter, which are  real-world applications matrices,
 have    been   extracted    from   the    Davis   collection,    University   of\r
 Florida~\cite{Dav97}.\r
 \r
-\begin{table}[htbp]\r
+\begin{table*}[htbp]\r
 \begin{center}\r
 \begin{tabular}{|c|c|r|r|r|} \r
 \hline\r
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ torso3             & 2D/3D problem & 259,156 & 4,429,042 \\
 \caption{Main characteristics of the sparse matrices chosen from the Davis collection}\r
 \label{tab:01}\r
 \end{center}\r
-\end{table}\r
+\end{table*}\r
 Chosen parameters  are detailed below.   \r
 We have  stopped  the  GMRES every  30\r
 iterations (\emph{i.e.}, $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$), which is the default \r
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ fact this also depends on two parameters: the number of iterations before stoppi
 and the number of iterations to perform the minimization.\r
 \r
 \r
-\begin{table}[htbp]\r
+\begin{table*}[htbp]\r
 \begin{center}\r
 \begin{tabular}{|c|c|r|r|r|r|} \r
 \hline\r
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ torso3             & fgmres / sor  & 37.70 & 565 & 34.97 & 510 \\
 \caption{Comparison between sequential standalone (F)GMRES and TSIRM with (F)GMRES (time in seconds).}\r
 \label{tab:02}\r
 \end{center}\r
-\end{table}\r
+\end{table*}\r
 \r
 \r
 \r
@@ -805,6 +805,29 @@ Concerning the  experiments some  other remarks are  interesting.
 %%%*********************************************************\r
 \r
 \r
+%%NEW\r
+\begin{table*}[htbp]\r
+\begin{center}\r
+\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \r
+\hline\r
+\r
+  nb. cores   & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{FGMRES/ASM} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{TSIRM CGLS/ASM} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{FGMRES/HYPRE}   \\ \r
+\cline{2-7}\r
+                    & Time  & \# Iter.  & Time  & \# Iter. & Time  & \# Iter.   \\\hline \hline\r
+   512              & 5.54      & 685    & 2.5 &       570  & 128.9 & 9     \\\r
+   2048             & 14.95     & 1,560  &  5.2 &     746   & 335.7 & 9 \\\r
+   4096             & 25.13    & 2,369   & 5.61 &   859  &   >1000  & -- \\\r
+   8192             & 44.35   & 3,197   &  7.6  &  1083 & >1000 &  --   \\\r
+\r
+\hline\r
+\r
+\end{tabular}\r
+\caption{Comparison of FGMRES  and TSIRM for ex45 of PETSc with two preconditioner (ASM and HYPRE)  having 25,000 components per core on Curie ($\epsilon_{tsirm}=1e-10$, $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$, $s=12$, $max\_iter_{ls}=15$, $\epsilon_{ls}=1e-40$),  time is expressed in seconds.}\r
+\label{tab:06}\r
+\end{center}\r
+\end{table*}\r
+\r
+%%ENDNEW\r
 \r
 %%%*********************************************************\r
 %%%*********************************************************\r