X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/GMRES2stage.git/blobdiff_plain/a1ff3fa3715cb0844074d7927cd852f6e0cb6b3f..af93eecf8bd45d51b68e4c9ac79d9e2bf7100db4:/paper.tex diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex index e93737c..2d34b8f 100644 --- a/paper.tex +++ b/paper.tex @@ -601,9 +601,27 @@ is summarized while intended perspectives are provided. %%%********************************************************* \section{Related works} \label{sec:02} -Krylov subspace iteration methods have increasingly become useful and successful techniques for solving linear and nonlinear systems and eigenvalue problems, especially since the increase development of the preconditioners~\cite{Saad2003,Meijerink77}. One reason of the popularity of these methods is their generality, simplicity and efficiency to solve systems of equations arising from very large and complex problems. %A Krylov method is based on a projection process onto a Krylov subspace spanned by vectors and it forms a sequence of approximations by minimizing the residual over the subspace formed~\cite{}. - -GMRES is one of the most widely used Krylov iterative method for solving sparse and large linear systems. It is developed by Saad and al.~\cite{Saad86} as a generalized method to deal with unsymmetric and non-Hermitian problems, and indefinite symmetric problems too. In its original version called full GMRES, it minimizes the residual over the current Krylov subspace until convergence in at most $n$ iterations, where $n$ is the size of the sparse matrix. It should be noted that full GMRES is too expensive in the case of large matrices since the required orthogonalization process per iteration grows quadratically with the number of iterations. For that reason, in practice GMRES is restarted after each $m\ll n$ iterations to avoid the storage of a large orthonormal basis. However, the convergence behavior of the restarted GMRES, called GMRES($m$), in many cases depends quite critically on the value of $m$~\cite{Huang89}. Therefore in most cases, a preconditioning technique is applied to the restarted GMRES method in order to improve its convergence. +Krylov subspace iteration methods have increasingly become useful and successful +techniques for solving linear, nonlinear systems and eigenvalue problems, +especially since the increase development of the +preconditioners~\cite{Saad2003,Meijerink77}. One reason of the popularity of +these methods is their generality, simplicity and efficiency to solve systems of +equations arising from very large and complex problems. + +GMRES is one of the most widely used Krylov iterative method for solving sparse +and large linear systems. It is developed by Saad and al.~\cite{Saad86} as a +generalized method to deal with unsymmetric and non-Hermitian problems, and +indefinite symmetric problems too. In its original version called full GMRES, it +minimizes the residual over the current Krylov subspace until convergence in at +most $n$ iterations, where $n$ is the size of the sparse matrix. It should be +noticed that full GMRES is too expensive in the case of large matrices since the +required orthogonalization process per iteration grows quadratically with the +number of iterations. For that reason, in practice GMRES is restarted after each +$m\ll n$ iterations to avoid the storage of a large orthonormal basis. However, +the convergence behavior of the restarted GMRES, called GMRES($m$), in many +cases depends quite critically on the value of $m$~\cite{Huang89}. Therefore in +most cases, a preconditioning technique is applied to the restarted GMRES method +in order to improve its convergence. In order to enhance the robustness of Krylov iterative solvers, some techniques have been proposed allowing the use of different preconditioners, if necessary, within the iteration instead of restarting. Those techniques may lead to considerable savings in CPU time and memory requirements. Van der Vorst in~\cite{Vorst94} has proposed variants of the GMRES algorithm in which a different preconditioner is applied in each iteration, so-called GMRESR family of nested methods. In fact, the GMRES method is effectively preconditioned with other iterative schemes (or GMRES itself), where the iterations of the GMRES method are called outer iterations while the iterations of the preconditioning process referred to as inner iterations. Saad in~\cite{Saad:1993} has proposed FGMRES which is another variant of the GMRES algorithm using a variable preconditioner. In FGMRES the search directions are preconditioned whereas in GMRESR the residuals are preconditioned. However in practice the good preconditioners are those based on direct methods, as ILU preconditioners, which are not easy to parallelize and suffer from the scalability problems on large clusters of thousands of cores. @@ -621,7 +639,7 @@ a given number of outer iterations. %%%********************************************************* %%%********************************************************* -\section{Two-stage iteration with least-squares residuals minimization algorithm} +\section{TSIRM: Two-stage iteration with least-squares residuals minimization algorithm} \label{sec:03} A two-stage algorithm is proposed to solve large sparse linear systems of the form $Ax=b$, where $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ is a sparse and square @@ -685,16 +703,16 @@ method is called for a maximum of $max\_iter_{kryl}$ iterations. In practice, we suggest to set this parameter equal to the restart number in the GMRES-like method. Moreover, a tolerance threshold must be specified for the solver. In practice, this threshold must be much smaller than the convergence threshold of -the TSIRM algorithm (\emph{i.e.}, $\epsilon_{tsirm}$). We also consider that -after the call of the $Solve$ function, we obtain the vector $x_k$ and the error -which is defined by $||Ax_k-b||_2$. +the TSIRM algorithm (\emph{i.e.}, $\epsilon_{tsirm}$). We also consider that +after the call of the $Solve$ function, we obtain the vector $x_k$ and the +$error$ which is defined by $||Ax_k-b||_2$. - Line~\ref{algo:store}, -$S_{k \mod s}=x_k$ consists in copying the solution $x_k$ into the column $k -\mod s$ of $S$. After the minimization, the matrix $S$ is reused with the new -values of the residuals. To solve the minimization problem, an iterative method -is used. Two parameters are required for that: the maximum number of iterations -and the threshold to stop the method. + Line~\ref{algo:store}, $S_{k \mod s}=x_k$ consists in copying the solution + $x_k$ into the column $k \mod s$ of $S$. After the minimization, the matrix + $S$ is reused with the new values of the residuals. To solve the minimization + problem, an iterative method is used. Two parameters are required for that: + the maximum number of iterations ($max\_iter_{ls}$) and the threshold to stop + the method ($\epsilon_{ls}$). Let us summarize the most important parameters of TSIRM: \begin{itemize} @@ -715,8 +733,9 @@ efficient since the matrix $A$ is sparse and since the matrix $S$ contains few columns in practice. As explained previously, at least two methods seem to be interesting to solve the least-squares minimization, CGLS and LSQR. -In the following we remind the CGLS algorithm. The LSQR method follows more or -less the same principle but it takes more place, so we briefly explain the parallelization of CGLS which is similar to LSQR. +In Algorithm~\ref{algo:02} we remind the CGLS algorithm. The LSQR method follows +more or less the same principle but it takes more place, so we briefly explain +the parallelization of CGLS which is similar to LSQR. \begin{algorithm}[t] \caption{CGLS} @@ -745,9 +764,10 @@ less the same principle but it takes more place, so we briefly explain the paral In each iteration of CGLS, there is two matrix-vector multiplications and some -classical operations: dot product, norm, multiplication and addition on vectors. All -these operations are easy to implement in PETSc or similar environment. - +classical operations: dot product, norm, multiplication and addition on +vectors. All these operations are easy to implement in PETSc or similar +environment. It should be noticed that LSQR follows the same principle, it is a +little bit longer but it performs more or less the same operations. %%%********************************************************* @@ -835,12 +855,12 @@ which concludes the induction and the proof. \label{sec:05} -In order to see the behavior of the proposal when considering only one processor, a first -comparison with GMRES or FGMRES and the new algorithm detailed previously has been experimented. -Matrices that have been used with their characteristics (names, fields, rows, and nonzero coefficients) are detailed in -Table~\ref{tab:01}. These latter, which are real-world applications matrices, -have been extracted - from the Davis collection, University of +In order to see the behavior of our approach when considering only one processor, +a first comparison with GMRES or FGMRES and the new algorithm detailed +previously has been experimented. Matrices that have been used with their +characteristics (names, fields, rows, and nonzero coefficients) are detailed in +Table~\ref{tab:01}. These latter, which are real-world applications matrices, +have been extracted from the Davis collection, University of Florida~\cite{Dav97}. \begin{table}[htbp] @@ -861,12 +881,10 @@ torso3 & 2D/3D problem & 259,156 & 4,429,042 \\ \label{tab:01} \end{center} \end{table} -Chosen parameters are detailed below. -%The following parameters have been chosen for our experiments. -As by default -the restart of GMRES is performed every 30 iterations, we have chosen to stop -the GMRES every 30 iterations (\emph{i.e.} $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$). $s$ is set to 8. CGLS is -chosen to minimize the least-squares problem with the following parameters: +Chosen parameters are detailed below. As by default the restart of GMRES is +performed every 30 iterations, we have chosen to stop the GMRES every 30 +iterations (\emph{i.e.} $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$). $s$ is set to 8. CGLS is chosen +to minimize the least-squares problem with the following parameters: $\epsilon_{ls}=1e-40$ and $max\_iter_{ls}=20$. The external precision is set to $\epsilon_{tsirm}=1e-10$. Those experiments have been performed on a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3630QM CPU @ 2.40GHz with the version 3.5.1 of PETSc. @@ -874,13 +892,13 @@ Core(TM) i7-3630QM CPU @ 2.40GHz with the version 3.5.1 of PETSc. In Table~\ref{tab:02}, some experiments comparing the solving of the linear systems obtained with the previous matrices with a GMRES variant and with TSIRM -are given. In the second column, it can be noticed that either GRMES or FGMRES +are given. In the second column, it can be noticed that either GMRES or FGMRES (Flexible GMRES)~\cite{Saad:1993} is used to solve the linear system. According -to the matrices, different preconditioner is used. With TSIRM, the same solver -and the same preconditionner are used. This Table shows that TSIRM can +to the matrices, different preconditioners are used. With TSIRM, the same +solver and the same preconditionner are used. This Table shows that TSIRM can drastically reduce the number of iterations to reach the convergence when the number of iterations for the normal GMRES is more or less greater than 500. In -fact this also depends on tow parameters: the number of iterations to stop GMRES +fact this also depends on two parameters: the number of iterations to stop GMRES and the number of iterations to perform the minimization. @@ -912,8 +930,8 @@ torso3 & fgmres / sor & 37.70 & 565 & 34.97 & 510 \\ In order to perform larger experiments, we have tested some example applications -of PETSc. Those applications are available in the ksp part which is suited for -scalable linear equations solvers: +of PETSc. Those applications are available in the \emph{ksp} part which is +suited for scalable linear equations solvers: \begin{itemize} \item ex15 is an example which solves in parallel an operator using a finite difference scheme. The diagonal is equal to 4 and 4 extra-diagonals @@ -926,8 +944,7 @@ scalable linear equations solvers: \end{itemize} For more technical details on these applications, interested readers are invited to read the codes available in the PETSc sources. Those problems have been -chosen because they are scalable with many cores which is not the case of other -problems that we have tested. +chosen because they are scalable with many cores. In the following larger experiments are described on two large scale architectures: Curie and Juqeen. Both these architectures are supercomputer