<html><head><meta name="color-scheme" content="light dark"></head><body><pre style="word-wrap: break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;">X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/GMRES2stage.git/blobdiff_plain/df562f71fc6dcfdbb4e0b77f138977ca7219df6f..42497688801cf1834fb46147eb2837a6fa13e5a0:/IJHPCN/paper.tex

diff --git a/IJHPCN/paper.tex b/IJHPCN/paper.tex
index 0c88f29..3aa76de 100644
--- a/IJHPCN/paper.tex
+++ b/IJHPCN/paper.tex
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ Table~\ref{tab:01}.  These  latter, which are  real-world applications matrices,
 have    been   extracted    from   the    Davis   collection,    University   of
 Florida~\cite{Dav97}.
 
-\begin{table}[htbp]
+\begin{table*}[htbp]
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|c|c|r|r|r|} 
 \hline
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ torso3             &amp; 2D/3D problem &amp; 259,156 &amp; 4,429,042 \\
 \caption{Main characteristics of the sparse matrices chosen from the Davis collection}
 \label{tab:01}
 \end{center}
-\end{table}
+\end{table*}
 Chosen parameters  are detailed below.   
 We have  stopped  the  GMRES every  30
 iterations (\emph{i.e.}, $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$), which is the default 
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ fact this also depends on two parameters: the number of iterations before stoppi
 and the number of iterations to perform the minimization.
 
 
-\begin{table}[htbp]
+\begin{table*}[htbp]
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|c|c|r|r|r|r|} 
 \hline
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ torso3             &amp; fgmres / sor  &amp; 37.70 &amp; 565 &amp; 34.97 &amp; 510 \\
 \caption{Comparison between sequential standalone (F)GMRES and TSIRM with (F)GMRES (time in seconds).}
 \label{tab:02}
 \end{center}
-\end{table}
+\end{table*}
 
 
 
@@ -805,6 +805,29 @@ Concerning the  experiments some  other remarks are  interesting.
 %%%*********************************************************
 
 
+%%NEW
+\begin{table*}[htbp]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} 
+\hline
+
+  nb. cores   &amp; \multicolumn{2}{c|}{FGMRES/ASM} &amp; \multicolumn{2}{c|}{TSIRM CGLS/ASM} &amp; \multicolumn{2}{c|}{FGMRES/HYPRE}   \\ 
+\cline{2-7}
+                    &amp; Time  &amp; \# Iter.  &amp; Time  &amp; \# Iter. &amp; Time  &amp; \# Iter.   \\\hline \hline
+   512              &amp; 5.54      &amp; 685    &amp; 2.5 &amp;       570  &amp; 128.9 &amp; 9     \\
+   2048             &amp; 14.95     &amp; 1,560  &amp;  5.2 &amp;     746   &amp; 335.7 &amp; 9 \\
+   4096             &amp; 25.13    &amp; 2,369   &amp; 5.61 &amp;   859  &amp;   &gt;1000  &amp; -- \\
+   8192             &amp; 44.35   &amp; 3,197   &amp;  7.6  &amp;  1083 &amp; &gt;1000 &amp;  --   \\
+
+\hline
+
+\end{tabular}
+\caption{Comparison of FGMRES  and TSIRM for ex45 of PETSc with two preconditioner (ASM and HYPRE)  having 25,000 components per core on Curie ($\epsilon_{tsirm}=1e-10$, $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$, $s=12$, $max\_iter_{ls}=15$, $\epsilon_{ls}=1e-40$),  time is expressed in seconds.}
+\label{tab:06}
+\end{center}
+\end{table*}
+
+%%ENDNEW
 
 %%%*********************************************************
 %%%*********************************************************
</pre></body></html>