From 42497688801cf1834fb46147eb2837a6fa13e5a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: couturie Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:33:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] new --- IJHPCN/paper.tex | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/IJHPCN/paper.tex b/IJHPCN/paper.tex index 0c88f29..3aa76de 100644 --- a/IJHPCN/paper.tex +++ b/IJHPCN/paper.tex @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ Table~\ref{tab:01}. These latter, which are real-world applications matrices, have been extracted from the Davis collection, University of Florida~\cite{Dav97}. -\begin{table}[htbp] +\begin{table*}[htbp] \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|r|r|r|} \hline @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ torso3 & 2D/3D problem & 259,156 & 4,429,042 \\ \caption{Main characteristics of the sparse matrices chosen from the Davis collection} \label{tab:01} \end{center} -\end{table} +\end{table*} Chosen parameters are detailed below. We have stopped the GMRES every 30 iterations (\emph{i.e.}, $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$), which is the default @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ fact this also depends on two parameters: the number of iterations before stoppi and the number of iterations to perform the minimization. -\begin{table}[htbp] +\begin{table*}[htbp] \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|r|r|r|r|} \hline @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ torso3 & fgmres / sor & 37.70 & 565 & 34.97 & 510 \\ \caption{Comparison between sequential standalone (F)GMRES and TSIRM with (F)GMRES (time in seconds).} \label{tab:02} \end{center} -\end{table} +\end{table*} @@ -805,6 +805,29 @@ Concerning the experiments some other remarks are interesting. %%%********************************************************* +%%NEW +\begin{table*}[htbp] +\begin{center} +\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} +\hline + + nb. cores & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{FGMRES/ASM} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{TSIRM CGLS/ASM} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{FGMRES/HYPRE} \\ +\cline{2-7} + & Time & \# Iter. & Time & \# Iter. & Time & \# Iter. \\\hline \hline + 512 & 5.54 & 685 & 2.5 & 570 & 128.9 & 9 \\ + 2048 & 14.95 & 1,560 & 5.2 & 746 & 335.7 & 9 \\ + 4096 & 25.13 & 2,369 & 5.61 & 859 & >1000 & -- \\ + 8192 & 44.35 & 3,197 & 7.6 & 1083 & >1000 & -- \\ + +\hline + +\end{tabular} +\caption{Comparison of FGMRES and TSIRM for ex45 of PETSc with two preconditioner (ASM and HYPRE) having 25,000 components per core on Curie ($\epsilon_{tsirm}=1e-10$, $max\_iter_{kryl}=30$, $s=12$, $max\_iter_{ls}=15$, $\epsilon_{ls}=1e-40$), time is expressed in seconds.} +\label{tab:06} +\end{center} +\end{table*} + +%%ENDNEW %%%********************************************************* %%%********************************************************* -- 2.39.5