X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/JournalMultiPeriods.git/blobdiff_plain/6a0a093a654ceb1379ce0aa8439c1650c04f9929..8029b7a5810c94a0bf1f2e0b4b37432a875a5015:/article.tex?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex
index 0894ca4..99b5e0e 100644
--- a/article.tex
+++ b/article.tex
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ Subject to
 \end{equation}
 
 \begin{equation}
-  \sum_{t=1}^{T}  X_{t,j}   \leq  \floor*{RE_{j}/E_{R}} \hspace{6 mm} \forall j \in J, t = 1,\dots,T
+  \sum_{t=1}^{T}  X_{t,j}   \leq  \floor*{RE_{j}/E_{R}} \hspace{10 mm}\forall j \in J\hspace{6 mm} 
   \label{eq144} 
 \end{equation}
 
@@ -853,6 +853,8 @@ to guarantee that the maximum number of points are covered during each round.
 %% MS W_theta is smaller than W_u => problem with the following sentence
 In our simulations priority is given  to the coverage by choosing $W_{U}$ very
 large compared to $W_{\theta}$.
+
+\textcolor{green}{The size of the problem depends on the number of variables and constraints. The number of variables is linked to the number of alive sensors $A \subset J$, the number of rounds $T$, and the number of primary points $P$. Thus the integer program contains $A*T$ variables of type $X_{t,j}$, $P*T$ overcoverage variables and $P*T$ undercoverage variables. The number of constraints is equal to $P*T$ (for constraints (\ref{eq16})) $+$ $A$ (for constraints (\ref{eq144})).}
 %The Active-Sleep packet includes the schedule vector with the number of rounds that should be applied by the receiving sensor node during the sensing phase.
 
 
@@ -1399,7 +1401,7 @@ Comparison shows that Model-5, which uses less number of primary points, is the
 %\end{enumerate}
 
 
-%\subsection{Results and analysis}
+\subsection{Comparison Results}
 
 \subsubsection{Coverage ratio}