From: couturie <couturie@extinction>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:25:52 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: move of images....
X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/JournalMultiPeriods.git/commitdiff_plain/82118333bcdd1e2615611a6f72996c619397d3f0?ds=inline

move of images....
---

diff --git a/F/ASR.pdf b/FASR.pdf
similarity index 100%
rename from F/ASR.pdf
rename to FASR.pdf
diff --git a/F/CR.pdf b/FCR.pdf
similarity index 100%
rename from F/CR.pdf
rename to FCR.pdf
diff --git a/F/EC50.pdf b/FEC50.pdf
similarity index 100%
rename from F/EC50.pdf
rename to FEC50.pdf
diff --git a/F/EC95.pdf b/FEC95.pdf
similarity index 100%
rename from F/EC95.pdf
rename to FEC95.pdf
diff --git a/F/SR.pdf b/FSR.pdf
similarity index 100%
rename from F/SR.pdf
rename to FSR.pdf
diff --git a/R2/LT50.pdf b/R2LT50.pdf
similarity index 100%
rename from R2/LT50.pdf
rename to R2LT50.pdf
diff --git a/R2/LT95.pdf b/R2LT95.pdf
similarity index 100%
rename from R2/LT95.pdf
rename to R2LT95.pdf
diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex
index 329426f..eb65d9f 100644
--- a/article.tex
+++ b/article.tex
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ because it offers a good coverage ratio for a larger number of periods.
 
 \begin{figure}[t!]
 \centering
- \includegraphics[scale=0.5] {R2/CR.pdf} 
+ \includegraphics[scale=0.5] {R2CR.pdf} 
 \caption{Coverage ratio for 150 deployed nodes}
 \label{Figures/ch4/R2/CR}
 \end{figure} 
@@ -786,9 +786,9 @@ lifetime improvement.
 \begin{figure}[h!]
 \centering
 \centering
-\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{R2/LT95.pdf}\\~ ~ ~ ~ ~(a) \\
+\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{R2LT95.pdf}\\~ ~ ~ ~ ~(a) \\
 
-\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{R2/LT50.pdf}\\~ ~ ~ ~ ~(b)
+\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{R2LT50.pdf}\\~ ~ ~ ~ ~(b)
 
 \caption{Network lifetime for (a) $Lifetime_{95}$ and (b) $Lifetime_{50}$}
   \label{Figures/ch4/R2/LT}
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ the best coverage ratio up to round~80, after that MuDiLCO-5 is slightly better.
 
 \begin{figure}[ht!]
 \centering
- \includegraphics[scale=0.5] {F/CR.pdf} 
+ \includegraphics[scale=0.5] {FCR.pdf} 
 \caption{Average coverage ratio for 150 deployed nodes}
 \label{fig3}
 \end{figure} 
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ efficient manner.
 
 \begin{figure}[ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{F/ASR.pdf}  
+\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{FASR.pdf}  
 \caption{Active sensors ratio for 150 deployed nodes}
 \label{fig4}
 \end{figure} 
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ in a subregion is still connected.
 
 \begin{figure}[ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{F/SR.pdf} 
+\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{FSR.pdf} 
 \caption{Cumulative percentage of stopped simulation runs for 150 deployed nodes}
 \label{fig6}
 \end{figure} 
@@ -874,9 +874,9 @@ network sizes, for $Lifetime_{95}$ and $Lifetime_{50}$.
 \begin{figure}[h!]
   \centering
   \begin{tabular}{cl}
-    \parbox{9.5cm}{\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{F/EC95.pdf}} & (a) \\
+    \parbox{9.5cm}{\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{FEC95.pdf}} & (a) \\
     \verb+ + \\
-    \parbox{9.5cm}{\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{F/EC50.pdf}} & (b)
+    \parbox{9.5cm}{\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{FEC50.pdf}} & (b)
   \end{tabular}
   \caption{Energy consumption for (a) $Lifetime_{95}$ and 
     (b) $Lifetime_{50}$}