\usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{graphicx}
+\usepackage{algorithm}
+\usepackage{algpseudocode}
+\usepackage{multirow}
+
+\algnewcommand\algorithmicinput{\textbf{Input:}}
+\algnewcommand\Input{\item[\algorithmicinput]}
+
+\algnewcommand\algorithmicoutput{\textbf{Output:}}
+\algnewcommand\Output{\item[\algorithmicoutput]}
+
+\newcommand{\Time}[1]{\mathit{Time}_\mathit{#1}}
+\newcommand{\Prec}{\mathit{prec}}
+\newcommand{\Ratio}{\mathit{Ratio}}
+
+\def\changemargin#1#2{\list{}{\rightmargin#2\leftmargin#1}\item[]}
+\let\endchangemargin=\endlist
\title{A scalable multisplitting algorithm for solving large sparse linear systems}
+\date{}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
\begin{abstract}
-In this paper we revist the krylov multisplitting algorithm presented in
-\cite{huang1993krylov} which uses a scalar method to minimize the krylov
+In this paper we revisit the Krylov multisplitting algorithm presented in
+\cite{huang1993krylov} which uses a sequential method to minimize the Krylov
iterations computed by a multisplitting algorithm. Our new algorithm is based on
a parallel multisplitting algorithm with few blocks of large size using a
-parallel GMRES method inside each block and on a parallel krylov minimization in
+parallel GMRES method inside each block and on a parallel Krylov minimization in
order to improve the convergence. Some large scale experiments with a 3D Poisson
-problem are presented. They show the obtained improvements compared to a
-classical GMRES both in terms of number of iterations and execution times.
+problem are presented with up to 8,192 cores. They show the obtained
+improvements compared to a classical GMRES both in terms of number of iterations
+and execution times.
\end{abstract}
-
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
\section{Introduction}
-
Iterative methods are used to solve large sparse linear systems of equations of
the form $Ax=b$ because they are easier to parallelize than direct ones. Many
-iterative methods have been proposed and adapted by many researchers. When
-solving large linear systems with many cores, iterative methods often suffer
-from scalability problems. This is due to their need for collective
+iterative methods have been proposed and adapted by many researchers. For
+example, the GMRES method and the Conjugate Gradient method are very well known
+and used by many researchers~\cite{S96}. Both methods are based on the
+Krylov subspace which consists in forming a basis of a sequence of successive
+matrix powers times the initial residual.
+
+When solving large linear systems with many cores, iterative methods often
+suffer from scalability problems. This is due to their need for collective
communications to perform matrix-vector products and reduction operations.
-Preconditionners can be used in order to increase the convergence of iterative
-solvers. However, most of the good preconditionners are not sclalable when
+Preconditioners can be used in order to increase the convergence of iterative
+solvers. However, most of the good preconditioners are not scalable when
thousands of cores are used.
+%Traditional iterative solvers have global synchronizations that penalize the
+%scalability. Two possible solutions consists either in using asynchronous
+%iterative methods~\cite{ref18} or to use multisplitting algorithms. In this
+%paper, we will reconsider the use of a multisplitting method. In opposition to
+%traditional multisplitting method that suffer from slow convergence, as
+%proposed in~\cite{huang1993krylov}, the use of a minimization process can
+%drastically improve the convergence.
+
+Traditional parallel iterative solvers are based on fine-grain computations that
+frequently require data exchanges between computing nodes and have global
+synchronizations that penalize the scalability. Particularly, they are more
+penalized on large scale architectures or on distributed platforms composed of
+distant clusters interconnected by a high-latency network. It is therefore
+imperative to develop coarse-grain based algorithms to reduce the communications
+in the parallel iterative solvers. Two possible solutions consists either in
+using asynchronous iterative methods~\cite{ref18} or to use multisplitting
+algorithms. In this paper, we will reconsider the use of a multisplitting
+method. In opposition to traditional multisplitting method that suffer from slow
+convergence, as proposed in~\cite{huang1993krylov}, the use of a minimization
+process can drastically improve the convergence.
+
+The present paper is organized as follows. First, Section~\ref{sec:02} presents
+some related works and the principle of multisplitting methods. Then, in
+Section~\ref{sec:03} is presented the algorithm of our Krylov multisplitting
+method based on inner-outer iterations. Finally, in Section~\ref{sec:04}, the
+parallel experiments on Hector architecture show the performances of the Krylov
+multisplitting algorithm compared to the classical GMRES algorithm to solve a 3D
+Poisson problem.
-A completer...
-On ne peut pas parler de tout...\\
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\section{Related works and presentation of the multisplitting method}
+\label{sec:02}
+A general framework for studying parallel multisplitting has been presented in~\cite{o1985multi}
+by O'Leary and White. Convergence conditions are given for the
+most general case. Many authors improved multisplitting algorithms by proposing
+for example an asynchronous version~\cite{bru1995parallel} and convergence
+conditions~\cite{bai1999block,bahi2000asynchronous} in this case or other
+two-stage algorithms~\cite{frommer1992h,bru1995parallel}.
+In~\cite{huang1993krylov}, the authors proposed a parallel multisplitting
+algorithm in which all the tasks except one are devoted to solve a sub-block of
+the splitting and to send their local solutions to the first task which is in
+charge to combine the vectors at each iteration. These vectors form a Krylov
+basis for which the first task minimizes the error function over the basis to
+increase the convergence, then the other tasks receive the updated solution until
+convergence of the global system.
+
+In~\cite{couturier2008gremlins}, the authors proposed practical implementations
+of multisplitting algorithms to solve large scale linear systems. Inner solvers
+could be based on sequential direct method with the LU method or sequential iterative
+one with GMRES.
-%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-%% BEGIN
-%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-The key idea of the multisplitting method for solving a large system
-of linear equations $Ax=b$ consists in partitioning the matrix $A$ in
-$L$ several ways
+In~\cite{prace-multi}, the authors have proposed a parallel multisplitting
+algorithm in which large blocks are solved using a GMRES solver. The authors have
+performed large scale experiments up-to 32,768 cores and they conclude that
+asynchronous multisplitting algorithm could be more efficient than traditional
+solvers on an exascale architecture with hundreds of thousands of cores.
+
+So compared to these works, we propose in this paper a practical multisplitting method based on parallel iterative blocks and gives better results than classical GMRES method for the 3D Poisson problem we considered.
+\\
+
+The key idea of a multisplitting method to solve a large system of linear equations $Ax=b$ is defined as follows. The first step consists in partitioning the matrix $A$ in $L$ several ways
\begin{equation}
-A = M_l - N_l,~l\in\{1,\ldots,L\},
+A = M_\ell - N_\ell,
\label{eq01}
\end{equation}
-where $M_l$ are nonsingular matrices. Then the linear system is solved
-by iteration based on the multisplittings as follows
+where for all $\ell\in\{1,\ldots,L\}$ $M_\ell$ are non-singular matrices. Then the linear system is solved by iteration based on the obtained splittings as follows
\begin{equation}
-x^{k+1}=\displaystyle\sum^L_{l=1} E_l M^{-1}_l (N_l x^k + b),~k=1,2,3,\ldots
+x^{k+1}=\displaystyle\sum^L_{\ell=1} E_\ell M^{-1}_\ell (N_\ell x^k + b),~k=1,2,3,\ldots
\label{eq02}
\end{equation}
-where $E_l$ are non-negative and diagonal weighting matrices such that
-$\sum^L_{l=1}E_l=I$ ($I$ is an identity matrix). Thus the convergence
-of such a method is dependent on the condition
+where $E_\ell$ are non-negative and diagonal weighting matrices and their sum is an identity matrix $I$. The convergence of such a method is dependent on the condition
\begin{equation}
-\rho(\displaystyle\sum^L_{l=1}E_l M^{-1}_l N_l)<1.
+\rho(\displaystyle\sum^L_{\ell=1}E_\ell M^{-1}_\ell N_\ell)<1.
\label{eq03}
\end{equation}
+where $\rho$ is the spectral radius of the square matrix.
-The advantage of the multisplitting method is that at each iteration
-$k$ there are $L$ different linear sub-systems
+The advantage of the multisplitting method is that at each iteration $k$ there are $L$ different linear sub-systems
\begin{equation}
-v_l^k=M^{-1}_l N_l x_l^{k-1} + M^{-1}_l b,~l\in\{1,\ldots,L\},
+v_\ell^k=M^{-1}_\ell N_\ell x_\ell^{k-1} + M^{-1}_\ell b,~\ell\in\{1,\ldots,L\},
\label{eq04}
\end{equation}
-to be solved independently by a direct or an iterative method, where
-$v_l^k$ is the solution of the local sub-system. A multisplitting
-method using an iterative method for solving the $L$ linear
-sub-systems is called an inner-outer iterative method or a two-stage
-method. The results $v_l^k$ obtained from the different
-splittings~(\ref{eq04}) are combined to compute the solution $x^k$ of
-the linear system by using the diagonal weighting matrices
+to be solved independently by a direct or an iterative method, where $v_\ell$ is the solution of the local sub-system. Thus the computations of $\{v_\ell\}_{1\leq \ell\leq L}$ may be performed in parallel by a set of processors. A multisplitting method using an iterative method as an inner solver is called an inner-outer iterative method or a two-stage method. The results $v_\ell$ obtained from the different splittings~(\ref{eq04}) are combined to compute solution $x$ of the linear system by using the diagonal weighting matrices
\begin{equation}
-x^k = \displaystyle\sum^L_{l=1} E_l v_l^k,
+x^k = \displaystyle\sum^L_{\ell=1} E_\ell v_\ell^k,
\label{eq05}
\end{equation}
-In the case where the diagonal weighting matrices $E_l$ have only zero
-and one factors (i.e. $v_l^k$ are disjoint vectors), the
-multisplitting method is non-overlapping and corresponds to the block
-Jacobi method.
-%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-%% END
-%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
-\section{Related works}
-
-
-A general framework for studying parallel multisplitting has been presented in
-\cite{o1985multi} by O'Leary and White. Convergence conditions are given for the
-most general case. Many authors improved multisplitting algorithms by proposing
-for example a asynchronous version \cite{bru1995parallel} and convergence
-condition \cite{bai1999block,bahi2000asynchronous} in this case or other
-two-stage algorithms~\cite{frommer1992h,bru1995parallel}
-
-In \cite{huang1993krylov}, the authors proposed a parallel multisplitting
-algorithm in which all the tasks except one are devoted to solve a sub-block of
-the splitting and to send their local solution to the first task which is in
-charge to combine the vectors at each iteration. These vectors form a Krylov
-basis for which the first tasks minimize the error function over the basis to
-increase the convergence, then the other tasks receive the update solution until
-convergence of the global system.
-
-
-
-In \cite{couturier2008gremlins}, the authors proposed practical implementations
-of multisplitting algorithms that take benefit from multisplitting algorithms to
-solve large scale linear systems. Inner solvers could be based on scalar direct
-method with the LU method or scalar iterative one with GMRES.
-
-
-
+In the case where the diagonal weighting matrices $E_\ell$ have only zero and one factors (i.e. $v_\ell$ are disjoint vectors), the multisplitting method is non-overlapping and corresponds to the block Jacobi method.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
\section{A two-stage method with a minimization}
-Let $Ax=b$ be a given sparse and large linear system of $n$ equations
-to solve in parallel on $L$ clusters, physically adjacent or geographically
-distant, where $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ is a square and nonsingular
-matrix, $x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}$ is the solution vector and $b\in\mathbb{R}^{n}$
-is the right-hand side vector. The multisplitting of this linear system
-is defined as follows:
+\label{sec:03}
+Let $Ax=b$ be a given large and sparse linear system of $n$ equations to solve in parallel on $L$ clusters of processors, physically adjacent or geographically distant, where $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ is a square and non-singular matrix, $x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}$ is the solution vector and $b\in\mathbb{R}^{n}$ is the right-hand side vector. The multisplitting of this linear system is defined as follows
\begin{equation}
\left\{
\begin{array}{lll}
\right.
\label{sec03:eq01}
\end{equation}
-where for all $l\in\{1,\ldots,L\}$ $A_l$ is a rectangular block of size $n_l\times n$
-and $X_l$ and $B_l$ are sub-vectors of size $n_l$, such that $\sum_ln_l=n$. In this
-case, we use a row-by-row splitting without overlapping in such a way that successive
-rows of the sparse matrix $A$ and both vectors $x$ and $b$ are assigned to one cluster.
-So, the multisplitting format of the linear system is defined as follows:
+where for $\ell\in\{1,\ldots,L\}$, $A_\ell$ is a rectangular block of size $n_\ell\times n$ and $X_\ell$ and $B_\ell$ are sub-vectors of size $n_\ell$ each, such that $\sum_\ell n_\ell=n$. In this work, we use a row-by-row splitting without overlapping in such a way that successive rows of sparse matrix $A$ and both vectors $x$ and $b$ are assigned to one cluster. So, the multisplitting format of the linear system is defined as follows
\begin{equation}
-\forall l\in\{1,\ldots,L\} \mbox{,~} \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{l-1}A_{li}X_i + A_{ll}X_l + \displaystyle\sum_{i=l+1}^{L}A_{li}X_i = B_l,
+\forall \ell\in\{1,\ldots,L\} \mbox{,~} A_{\ell \ell}X_\ell + \displaystyle\sum_{\substack{m=1\\m\neq\ell}}^L A_{\ell m}X_m = B_\ell,
\label{sec03:eq02}
\end{equation}
-where $A_{li}$ is a block of size $n_l\times n_i$ of the rectangular matrix $A_l$, $X_i\neq X_l$
-is a sub-vector of size $n_i$ of the solution vector $x$ and $\sum_{i<l}n_i+\sum_{i>l}n_i+n_l=n$,
-for all $i\in\{1,\ldots,l-1,l+1,\ldots,L\}$.
+where $A_{\ell m}$ is a sub-block of size $n_\ell\times n_m$ of the rectangular matrix $A_\ell$, $X_m\neq X_\ell$ is a sub-vector of size $n_m$ of the solution vector $x$ and $\sum_{m\neq \ell}n_m+n_\ell=n$, for all $m\in\{1,\ldots,L\}$.
-The multisplitting method proceeds by iteration for solving the linear system in such a
-way each sub-system
+Our multisplitting method proceeds by iteration to solve the linear system in such a way that each sub-system
\begin{equation}
\left\{
\begin{array}{l}
-A_{ll}X_l = Y_l \mbox{,~such that}\\
-Y_l = B_l - \displaystyle\sum_{i=1,i\neq l}^{L}A_{li}X_i,
+A_{\ell \ell}X_\ell = Y_\ell \mbox{,~such that}\\
+Y_\ell = B_\ell - \displaystyle\sum_{\substack{m=1\\m\neq \ell}}^{L}A_{\ell m}X_m,
\end{array}
\right.
\label{sec03:eq03}
\end{equation}
-is solved independently by a cluster of processors and communication are required to
-update the right-hand side vectors $Y_l$, such that the vectors $X_i$ represent the data
-dependencies between the clusters. In this case, the parallel GMRES method is used
-as an inner iteration method for solving the linear sub-systems~(\ref{sec03:eq03}).
-
+is solved independently by a {\it cluster of processors} and communications are required to update the right-hand side vectors $Y_\ell$, such that the vectors $X_m$ represent the data dependencies between the clusters. In this work, we use the parallel restarted GMRES method~\cite{ref34} as an inner iteration method to solve sub-systems~(\ref{sec03:eq03}). GMRES is one of the most used Krylov iterative methods to solve sparse linear systems. %In practice, GMRES is used with a preconditioner to improve its convergence. In this work, we used a preconditioning matrix equivalent to the main diagonal of sparse sub-matrix $A_{ll}$. This preconditioner is straightforward to implement in parallel and gives good performances in many situations.
+
+It should be noted that the convergence of the inner iterative solver for the
+different sub-systems~(\ref{sec03:eq03}) does not necessarily involve the
+convergence of the multisplitting method. It strongly depends on the properties
+of the global sparse linear system to be
+solved~\cite{o1985multi,ref18}. Furthermore, the splitting of the linear system
+among several clusters of processors increases the spectral radius of the
+iteration matrix, thereby slowing the convergence. In fact, the larger the
+number of splitting is, the larger the spectral radius is. In this paper, we
+based on the work presented in~\cite{huang1993krylov} to increase the
+convergence and improve the scalability of the multisplitting methods.
+
+In order to accelerate the convergence, we implemented the outer iteration of the multisplitting solver as a Krylov iterative method which minimizes some error function over a Krylov subspace~\cite{S96}. The Krylov subspace that we used is spanned by a basis composed of successive solutions issued from solving the $L$ splittings~(\ref{sec03:eq03})
+\begin{equation}
+S=\{x^1,x^2,\ldots,x^s\},~s\leq n,
+\label{sec03:eq04}
+\end{equation}
+where for $j\in\{1,\ldots,s\}$, $x^j=[X_1^j,\ldots,X_L^j]$ is a solution of the global linear system. The advantage of such a Krylov subspace is that we need neither an orthogonal basis nor synchronizations between clusters to generate this basis.
+The multisplitting method is periodically restarted every $s$ iterations with a new initial guess $\tilde{x}=S\alpha$ which minimizes the error function $\|b-Ax\|_2$ over the Krylov subspace spanned by vectors of $S$. So $\alpha$ is defined as the solution of the large overdetermined linear system
+\begin{equation}
+R\alpha=b,
+\label{sec03:eq05}
+\end{equation}
+where $R=AS$ is a dense rectangular matrix of size $n\times s$ and $s\ll n$. This leads us to solve a system of normal equations
+\begin{equation}
+R^TR\alpha=R^Tb,
+\label{sec03:eq06}
+\end{equation}
+which is associated with the least squares problem
+\begin{equation}
+\text{minimize}~\|b-R\alpha\|_2,
+\label{sec03:eq07}
+\end{equation}
+where $R^T$ denotes the transpose of matrix $R$. Since $R$ (i.e. $AS$) and $b$ are split among $L$ clusters, the symmetric positive definite system~(\ref{sec03:eq06}) is solved in parallel. Thus an iterative method would be more appropriate than a direct one to solve this system. We use the parallel Conjugate Gradient method for the normal equations CGNR~\cite{S96,refCGNR}.
+
+\begin{algorithm}[!t]
+\caption{A two-stage linear solver with inner iteration GMRES method}
+\begin{algorithmic}[1]
+\Input $A_\ell$ (sparse sub-matrix), $B_\ell$ (right-hand side sub-vector)
+\Output $X_\ell$ (solution sub-vector)\vspace{0.2cm}
+\State Load $A_\ell$, $B_\ell$
+\State Set the initial guess $x^0$
+\State Set the minimizer $\tilde{x}^0=x^0$
+\For {$k=1,2,3,\ldots$ until the global convergence}
+\State Restart with $x^0=\tilde{x}^{k-1}$:
+\For {$j=1,2,\ldots,s$}
+\State \label{line7}Inner iteration solver: \Call{InnerSolver}{$x^0$, $j$}
+\State Construct basis $S$: add column vector $X_\ell^j$ to the matrix $S_\ell^k$
+\State Exchange local values of $X_\ell^j$ with the neighboring clusters
+\State Compute dense matrix $R$: $R_\ell^{k,j}=\sum^L_{i=1}A_{\ell i}X_i^j$
+\EndFor
+\State \label{line12}Minimization $\|b-R\alpha\|_2$: \Call{UpdateMinimizer}{$S_\ell$, $R$, $b$, $k$}
+\State Local solution of linear system $Ax=b$: $X_\ell^k=\tilde{X}_\ell^k$
+\State Exchange the local minimizer $\tilde{X}_\ell^k$ with the neighboring clusters
+\EndFor
+
+\Statex
+
+\Function {InnerSolver}{$x^0$, $j$}
+\State Compute local right-hand side $Y_\ell = B_\ell - \sum^L_{\substack{m=1\\m\neq \ell}}A_{\ell m}X_m^0$
+\State Solving local splitting $A_{\ell \ell}X_\ell^j=Y_\ell$ using parallel GMRES method, such that $X_\ell^0$ is the initial guess
+\State \Return $X_\ell^j$
+\EndFunction
+
+\Statex
+
+\Function {UpdateMinimizer}{$S_\ell$, $R$, $b$, $k$}
+\State Solving normal equations $(R^k)^TR^k\alpha^k=(R^k)^Tb$ in parallel by $L$ clusters using parallel CGNR method
+\State Compute local minimizer $\tilde{X}_\ell^k=S_\ell^k\alpha^k$
+\State \Return $\tilde{X}_\ell^k$
+\EndFunction
+\end{algorithmic}
+\label{algo:01}
+\end{algorithm}
+
+The main key points of our Krylov multisplitting method to solve a large sparse linear system are given in Algorithm~\ref{algo:01}. This algorithm is based on a two-stage method with a minimization using restarted GMRES iterative method as an inner solver. It is executed in parallel by each cluster of processors. Matrices and vectors with the subscript $\ell$ represent the local data for cluster $\ell$, where $\ell\in\{1,\ldots,L\}$. The two-stage solver uses two different parallel iterative algorithms: GMRES method to solve each splitting~(\ref{sec03:eq03}) on a cluster of processors, and CGNR method executed in parallel by all clusters to minimize the function error~(\ref{sec03:eq07}) over the Krylov subspace spanned by $S$. The algorithm requires two global synchronizations between $L$ clusters. The first one is performed at line~\ref{line12} in Algorithm~\ref{algo:01} to exchange local values of vector solution $x$ (i.e. the minimizer $\tilde{x}$) required to restart the multisplitting solver. The second one is needed to construct the matrix $R$. We chose to perform this latter synchronization $s$ times in every outer iteration $k$ (line~\ref{line7} in Algorithm~\ref{algo:01}). This is a straightforward way to compute the sparse matrix-dense matrix multiplication $R=AS$. We implemented all synchronizations by using message passing collective communications of MPI library.
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\section{Experiments}
+\label{sec:04}
+In order to illustrate the interest of our algorithm. We have compared our
+algorithm with the GMRES method which is a very well used method in many
+situations. We have chosen to focus on only one problem which is very simple to
+implement: a 3 dimension Poisson problem.
+\begin{equation}
+\left\{
+ \begin{array}{ll}
+ \nabla u&=f \mbox{~in~} \omega\\
+ u &=0 \mbox{~on~} \Gamma=\partial \omega
+ \end{array}
+ \right.
+\end{equation}
+After discretization, with a finite difference scheme, a seven point stencil is
+used. It is well-known that the spectral radius of matrices representing such
+problems are very close to 1. Moreover, the larger the number of discretization
+points is, the closer to 1 the spectral radius is. Hence, to solve a matrix
+obtained for a 3D Poisson problem, the number of iterations is high. Using a
+preconditioner it is possible to reduce the number of iterations but
+preconditioners are not scalable when using many cores.
+
+%Doing many experiments with many cores is not easy and requires to access to a supercomputer with several hours for developing a code and then improving it.
+In the following we present some experiments we could achieved out on the Hector
+architecture, a UK's high-end computing resource, funded by the UK Research
+Councils~\cite{hector}. This is a Cray XE6 supercomputer, equipped with two
+16-core AMD Opteron 2.3 Ghz and 32 GB of memory. Machines are interconnected
+with a 3D torus.
+
+Table~\ref{tab1} shows the result of the experiments. The first column shows
+the size of the 3D Poisson problem. The size is chosen in order to have
+approximately 50,000 components per core. The second column represents the
+number of cores used. In parenthesis, there is the decomposition used for the
+Krylov multisplitting. The third column and the sixth column respectively show
+the execution time for the GMRES and the Krylov multisplitting codes. The fourth
+and the seventh column describes the number of iterations. For the
+multisplitting code, the total number of inner iterations is represented in
+parenthesis. For the GMRES code (alone and in the multisplitting version) the
+restart parameter is fixed to 16. The precision of the GMRES version is fixed to
+1e-6. For the multisplitting, there are two precisions, one for the external
+solver which is fixed to 1e-6 and another one for the inner solver (GMRES) which
+is fixed to 1e-10. It should be noted that a high precision is used but we also
+fixed a maximum number of iterations for each internal step. In practice, we
+limit the number of iterations in the internal step to 10. So an internal iteration is finished
+when the precision is reached or when the maximum internal number of iterations
+is reached. The precision and the maximum number of iterations of CGNR method are fixed to 1e-25 and 20 respectively. The size of the Krylov subspace basis $S$ is fixed to 10 vectors.
+
+\begin{table}[htbp]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{changemargin}{-1.4cm}{0cm}
+\begin{footnotesize}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|c|c||c|c|c||c|}
+\hline
+\multirow{2}{*}{Pb size}&\multirow{2}{*}{Nb. cores} & \multicolumn{3}{c||}{GMRES} & \multicolumn{3}{c||}{Krylov Multisplitting} & \multirow{2}{*}{Ratio}\\
+ \cline{3-8}
+ & & Time (s) & nb Iter. & $\Delta$ & Time (s)& nb Iter. & $\Delta$ & \\
+\hline
+$468^3$ & 2,048 (2x1,024) & 299.7 & 41,028 & 5.02e-8 & 48.4 & 691(6,146) & 8.24e-08 & 6.19 \\
+\hline
+$590^3$ & 4,096 (2x2,048) & 433.1 & 55,494 & 4.92e-7 & 74.1 & 1,101(8,211) & 6.62e-08 & 5.84 \\
+\hline
+$743^3$ & 8,192 (2x4,096) & 704.4 & 87,822 & 4.80e-07 & 151.2 & 3,061(14,914) & 5.87e-08 & 4.65 \\
+\hline
+$743^3$ & 8,192 (4x2,048) & 704.4 & 87,822 & 4.80e-07 & 110.3 & 1,531(12,721) & 1.47e-07& 6.39 \\
+\hline
+
+\end{tabular}
+\caption{Results}
+\label{tab1}
+\end{footnotesize}
+\end{changemargin}
+\end{center}
+\end{table}
+
+
+
+
+\begin{table}[htbp]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{changemargin}{-1.8cm}{0cm}
+\begin{small}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|c|c||c|c|c||c|}
+\hline
+\multirow{2}{*}{Pb size}&\multirow{2}{*}{Nb. cores} & \multicolumn{3}{c||}{GMRES} & \multicolumn{3}{c||}{Krylov Multisplitting} & \multirow{2}{*}{Ratio}\\
+ \cline{3-8}
+ & & Time (s) & nb Iter. & $\Delta$ & Time (s)& nb Iter. & $\Delta$ & \\
+\hline
+$468^3$ & 2,048 (2x1,024) & 299.7 & 41,028 & 5.02e-8 & 48.4 & 691(6,146) & 8.24e-08 & 6.19 \\
+\hline
+$590^3$ & 4,096 (2x2,048) & 433.1 & 55,494 & 4.92e-7 & 74.1 & 1,101(8,211) & 6.62e-08 & 5.84 \\
+\hline
+$743^3$ & 8,192 (2x4,096) & 704.4 & 87,822 & 4.80e-07 & 151.2 & 3,061(14,914) & 5.87e-08 & 4.65 \\
+\hline
+$743^3$ & 8,192 (4x2,048) & 704.4 & 87,822 & 4.80e-07 & 110.3 & 1,531(12,721) & 1.47e-07& 6.39 \\
+\hline
+
+\end{tabular}
+\caption{Results}
+\label{tab1}
+\end{small}
+\end{changemargin}
+\end{center}
+\end{table}
+
+
+From these experiments, it can be observed that the multisplitting version is
+always faster than the GMRES version. The acceleration gain of the
+multisplitting version is between 4 and 6. It can be noticed that the number of
+iterations is drastically reduced with the multisplitting version even it is not
+neglectable. Moreover, with 8,192 cores, we can see that using 4 clusters gives
+better performance than simply using 2 clusters. In fact, we can remark that the
+precision with 2 clusters is slightly better but in both cases the precision is
+under the specified threshold.
+
+\section{Conclusion and perspectives}
+We have implemented a Krylov multisplitting method to solve sparse linear
+systems on large-scale computing platforms. We have developed a synchronous
+two-stage method based on the block Jacobi multisaplitting which uses GMRES
+iterative method as an inner iteration. Our contribution in this paper is
+twofold. First we provide a multi cluster decomposition that allows us to choose
+the appropriate size of the clusters according to the architecures of the
+supercomputer. Second, we have implemented the outer iteration of the
+multisplitting method as a Krylov subspace method which minimizes some error
+function. This increases the convergence and improves the scalability of the
+multisplitting method.
+
+We have tested our multisplitting method to solve the sparse linear system
+issued from the discretization of a 3D Poisson problem. We have compared its
+performances to the classical GMRES method on a supercomputer composed of 2,048
+to 8,192 cores. The experimental results showed that the multisplitting method is
+about 4 to 6 times faster than the GMRES method for different sizes of the
+problem split into 2 or 4 blocks when using multisplitting method. Indeed, the
+GMRES method has difficulties to scale with many cores while the Krylov
+multisplitting method allows to hide latency and reduce the inter-cluster
+communications.
+
+In future works, we plan to conduct experiments on larger number of cores and
+test the scalability of our Krylov multisplitting method. It would be
+interesting to validate its performances to solve other linear/nonlinear and
+symmetric/nonsymmetric problems. Moreover, we intend to develop multisplitting
+methods based on asynchronous iteration in which communications are overlapped
+by computations. These methods would be interesting for platforms composed of
+distant clusters interconnected by a high-latency network. In addition, we
+intend to investigate the convergence improvements of our method by using
+preconditioning techniques for Krylov iterative methods and multisplitting
+methods with overlapping blocks.
+
+\section{Acknowledgement}
+The authors would like to thank Mark Bull of the EPCC his fruitful remarks and the facilities of HECToR.
+
+%Other applications (=> other matrices)\\
+%Larger experiments\\
+%Async\\
+%Overlapping\\
+%preconditioning
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
