X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/Krylov_multi.git/blobdiff_plain/8dec794b01b4893a1ccc93250b6108a852feb2f7..093d9a0c041ba671daae9fba711b2ba2a937060e:/krylov_multi.tex?ds=inline

diff --git a/krylov_multi.tex b/krylov_multi.tex
index 61c1e28..14797c2 100644
--- a/krylov_multi.tex
+++ b/krylov_multi.tex
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 \usepackage{graphicx}
 \usepackage{algorithm}
 \usepackage{algpseudocode}
+\usepackage{multirow}
 
 \algnewcommand\algorithmicinput{\textbf{Input:}}
 \algnewcommand\Input{\item[\algorithmicinput]}
@@ -12,6 +13,9 @@
 \algnewcommand\algorithmicoutput{\textbf{Output:}}
 \algnewcommand\Output{\item[\algorithmicoutput]}
 
+\newcommand{\Time}[1]{\mathit{Time}_\mathit{#1}}
+\newcommand{\Prec}{\mathit{prec}}
+\newcommand{\Ratio}{\mathit{Ratio}}
 
 \title{A scalable multisplitting algorithm for solving large sparse linear systems} 
 \date{}
@@ -29,7 +33,7 @@
 
 
 \begin{abstract}
-In  this  paper we  revist  the  krylov  multisplitting algorithm  presented  in
+In  this paper  we  revisit  the krylov  multisplitting  algorithm presented  in
 \cite{huang1993krylov}  which  uses  a  scalar  method to  minimize  the  krylov
 iterations computed by a multisplitting algorithm. Our new algorithm is based on
 a  parallel multisplitting  algorithm  with few  blocks  of large  size using  a
@@ -328,6 +332,78 @@ synchronizations   by   using   the   MPI   collective   communication
 subroutines.
 
 
+\section{Experiments}
+
+In order  to illustrate  the interest  of our algorithm.   We have  compared our
+algorithm  with  the  GMRES  method  which  a very  well  used  method  in  many
+situations.  We have chosen to focus on only one problem which is very simple to
+implement: a 3 dimension Poisson problem.
+
+\begin{equation}
+\left\{
+                \begin{array}{ll}
+                  \nabla u&=f \mbox{~in~} \omega\\
+                  u &=0 \mbox{~on~}  \Gamma=\partial \omega
+                \end{array}
+              \right.
+\end{equation}
+
+After discretization, with a finite  difference scheme, a seven point stencil is
+used. It  is well-known that the  spectral radius of  matrices representing such
+problems are very close to 1.  Moreover, the larger the number of discretization
+points is,  the closer to 1  the spectral radius  is.  Hence, to solve  a matrix
+obtained for  a 3D Poisson  problem, the number  of iterations is high.  Using a
+preconditioner  it  is   possible  to  reduce  the  number   of  iterations  but
+preconditioners are not scalable when using many cores.
+
+Doing many experiments  with many cores is  not easy and require to  access to a
+supercomputer  with several  hours for  developping  a code  and then  improving
+it. In the following we presented  some experiments we could achieved out on the
+Hector architecture,  the previous UK's  high-end computing resource,  funded by
+the UK Research Councils, which has been stopped in the early 2014.
+
+In the experiments  we report the size of the 3D  poisson considered
+
+
+The first column  shows the size of the  problem The size is chosen  in order to
+have approximately 50,000 components per core.  The second column represents the
+number of  cores used. In parenthesis,  there is the decomposition  used for the
+Krylov multisplitting. The  third column and the sixth  column respectively show
+the execution time for the GMRES  and the Kyrlow multisplitting code. The fourth
+and  the   seventh  column   describes  the  number   of  iterations.   For  the
+multisplitting  code, the  total number  of inner  iterations is  represented in
+parenthesis.
+
+ We  also give  the other parameters:  the restart  for the GRMES method....
+
+\begin{table}[p]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|c|c||c|c|c||c|} 
+\hline
+\multirow{2}{*}{Pb size}&\multirow{2}{*}{Nb. cores} &  \multicolumn{3}{c||}{GMRES} &  \multicolumn{3}{c||}{Krylov Multisplitting} & \multirow{2}{*}{Ratio}\\
+ \cline{3-8}
+           &                   &  Time (s) & nb Iter. & $\Delta$  &   Time (s)& nb Iter. & $\Delta$ & \\
+\hline
+
+$590^3$ & 4096 (2x2048)        &  462.6    & 55,494    & 4.92e-7  &  74.1    & 1,101(8,211) & 6.62e-08  & 6.25   \\
+\hline
+$743^3$ & 8192 (2x4096)        & 704.4     & 87,822    & 4.80e-07 &  151.2   & 3,061(14,914) & 5.87e-08 & 4.65    \\
+\hline
+$743^3$ & 8192 (4x2048)        & 704.4     & 87,822    & 4.80e-07 &  110.3   & 1,531(12,721) & 1.47e-07& 6.39  \\
+\hline
+
+\end{tabular}
+\caption{CAPTION}
+\label{tab1}
+\end{center}
+\end{table}
+
+\section{Conclusion and perspectives}
+
+Other applications (=> other matrices)\\
+Larger experiments\\
+Async\\
+Overlapping
 
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
