ok

[LiCO.git] / PeCO-EO / articleeo.tex~

diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~
index 45982a2783d6e1e35dbeb5a397b444cc56bc398b..0acbf9b0a33d2a1b2fd69f6ca50c49fa4e5cd713 100644 (file)
--- a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~
+++ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ Figure \ref{fig333}.
 \r
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r
 \centering\r
 \r
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r
 \centering\r

-\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{R/ASR.eps}  \r
+\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{figure6.eps}  \r

 \caption{Active sensors ratio for 200 deployed nodes.}\r
 \label{fig444}\r
 \end{figure} \r
 \caption{Active sensors ratio for 200 deployed nodes.}\r
 \label{fig444}\r
 \end{figure} \r


@@ -856,8 +856,8 @@ while keeping a good coverage level.
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r
   \centering\r
   \begin{tabular}{@{}cr@{}}\r
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r
   \centering\r
   \begin{tabular}{@{}cr@{}}\r

-    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{R/EC95.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(a)} \\\r
-    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{R/EC50.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(b)}\r
+    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{figure7a.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(a)} \\\r
+    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{figure7b.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(b)}\r

   \end{tabular}\r
   \caption{Energy consumption per period for (a)~$Lifetime_{95}$ and (b)~$Lifetime_{50}$.}\r
   \label{fig3EC}\r
   \end{tabular}\r
   \caption{Energy consumption per period for (a)~$Lifetime_{95}$ and (b)~$Lifetime_{50}$.}\r
   \label{fig3EC}\r


@@ -888,8 +888,8 @@ Figure~\ref{fig3LT}(a) because the gain induced  by our protocols increases with
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r
   \centering\r
   \begin{tabular}{@{}cr@{}}\r
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r
   \centering\r
   \begin{tabular}{@{}cr@{}}\r

-    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{R/LT95.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(a)} \\  \r
-    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{R/LT50.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(b)}\r
+    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{figure8a.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(a)} \\  \r
+    \includegraphics[scale=0.475]{figure8b.eps} & \raisebox{2.75cm}{(b)}\r

   \end{tabular}\r
   \caption{Network Lifetime for (a)~$Lifetime_{95}$ \\\r
     and (b)~$Lifetime_{50}$.}\r
   \end{tabular}\r
   \caption{Network Lifetime for (a)~$Lifetime_{95}$ \\\r
     and (b)~$Lifetime_{50}$.}\r


@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ size. DiLCO is better  for coverage ratios near 100\%, but in  that case PeCO is
 not ineffective for the smallest network sizes.\r
 \r
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r
 not ineffective for the smallest network sizes.\r
 \r
 \begin{figure}[h!]\r

-\centering \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{R/LTa.eps}\r
+\centering \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{figure9.eps}\r

 \caption{Network lifetime for different coverage ratios.}\r
 \label{figLTALL}\r
 \end{figure} \r
 \caption{Network lifetime for different coverage ratios.}\r
 \label{figLTALL}\r
 \end{figure} \r