X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/LiCO.git/blobdiff_plain/d578c254a3c21012a1c9b3dc399aa179d3ebfb89..5175c89ff4c745da83f234c9fcad6bdd08fc8eb1:/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex

diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex
index 39a0559..a80c51c 100644
--- a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex
+++ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex
@@ -833,13 +833,12 @@ not ineffective for the smallest network sizes.
 
 
 \subsubsection{\bf Impact of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ on PeCO's performance}
-
-Table~\ref{tbl} shows the  impact of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ on PeCO's performance.
+Table~\ref{my-labelx} explains all possible network lifetime result of the relation between the different values of $\alpha$ and $\beta$, and for a network size equal to 200 sensor nodes. As can be seen in Table~\ref{my-labelx},  it is obvious and clear that when $\alpha$ decreased and $\beta$ increased by any step, the network lifetime for $Lifetime_{50}$ increased and the $Lifetime_{95}$ decreased. Therefore, selecting the values of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ depend on the application type used in the sensor nework. In PeCO protocol, $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are chosen based on the largest value of network lifetime for $Lifetime_{95}$.
 
 \begin{table}[h]
 \centering
 \caption{The impact of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ on PeCO's performance}
-\label{my-label}
+\label{my-labelx}
 \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
 \hline
 $\alpha$ & $\beta$ & $Lifetime_{50}$ & $Lifetime_{95}$ \\ \hline
@@ -861,35 +860,16 @@ $\alpha$ & $\beta$ & $Lifetime_{50}$ & $Lifetime_{95}$ \\ \hline
 \section{Conclusion and Future Works}
 \label{sec:Conclusion and Future Works}
 
-In this paper  we have studied the problem of  Perimeter-based Coverage Optimization in
-WSNs. We have designed  a new protocol, called Perimeter-based  Coverage Optimization, which
-schedules nodes'  activities (wake up  and sleep  stages) with the  objective of
-maintaining a  good coverage ratio  while maximizing the network  lifetime. This
-protocol is  applied in a distributed  way in regular subregions  obtained after
-partitioning the area of interest in a preliminary step. It works in periods and
-is based on the resolution of an integer program to select the subset of sensors
-operating in active status for each period. Our work is original in so far as it
-proposes for  the first  time an  integer program  scheduling the  activation of
-sensors  based on  their perimeter  coverage level,  instead of  using a  set of
-targets/points to be covered.   
-
-
-We  have carried out  several simulations  to  evaluate the  proposed protocol.   The
-simulation  results  show   that  PeCO  is  more   energy-efficient  than  other
-approaches, with respect to lifetime,  coverage ratio, active sensors ratio, and
-energy consumption.
+In this paper  we have studied the problem of  Perimeter-based Coverage Optimization in WSNs. We have designed  a new protocol, called Perimeter-based  Coverage Optimization, which schedules nodes'  activities (wake up  and sleep  stages) with the  objective of maintaining a  good coverage ratio  while maximizing the network  lifetime. This protocol is  applied in a distributed  way in regular subregions  obtained after partitioning the area of interest in a preliminary step. It works in periods and
+is based on the resolution of an integer program to select the subset of sensors operating in active status for each period. Our work is original in so far as it proposes for  the first  time an  integer program  scheduling the  activation of sensors  based on  their perimeter  coverage level,  instead of  using a  set of targets/points to be covered.   
 
-We plan to extend our framework so that the schedules are planned for multiple
-sensing periods.
 
-We also want  to improve our integer program to  take into account heterogeneous
-sensors  from both  energy  and node  characteristics point of views.
+We have carried out  several simulations  to  evaluate the  proposed protocol. The simulation  results  show   that  PeCO  is  more   energy-efficient  than  other approaches, with respect to lifetime,  coverage ratio, active sensors ratio, and energy consumption. 
 
-Finally,  it   would  be   interesting  to  implement   our  protocol   using  a
-sensor-testbed to evaluate it in real world applications.
+We plan to extend our framework so that the schedules are planned for multiple sensing periods. We also want to improve our integer program to  take into account heterogeneous sensors  from both  energy and node characteristics point of views. Finally,  it would  be interesting to implement our protocol using  a sensor-testbed to evaluate it in real world applications.
 
 \bibliographystyle{gENO}
-\bibliography{articleeo}
+\bibliography{biblio} %articleeo
 
 
 \end{document}