X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/LiCO.git/blobdiff_plain/f6596f038828729f02f48efdf049c4c08e4118e8..refs/heads/master:/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex

diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex
index 13c8c3d..3516881 100644
--- a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex
+++ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ from the first  intersection point  after  point~zero,  and  the maximum  level
 coverage is determined  for each interval defined by two  successive points. The
 maximum  level of  coverage is  equal to  the number  of overlapping  arcs.  For
 example, between~$5L$  and~$6L$ the maximum  level of  coverage is equal  to $3$
-(the value is highlighted in yellow  at the bottom of Figure~\ref{figure2}), which
+(the value is given at the bottom of Figure~\ref{figure2}), which
 means that at most 2~neighbors can cover  the perimeter in addition to node $0$. 
 Table~\ref{my-label} summarizes for each coverage  interval the maximum level of
 coverage and  the sensor  nodes covering the  perimeter.  The  example discussed
@@ -952,11 +952,8 @@ Finally,  it  would be  interesting  to  implement  the  PeCO protocol  using  a
 sensor-testbed to evaluate it in real world applications.
 
 \subsection*{Acknowledgments}
-The  authors  are   deeply  grateful  to  the  anonymous   reviewers  for  their
-constructive advice,  which improved the  technical quality  of the paper.  As a
-Ph.D.   student, Ali  Kadhum Idrees  would  like to  gratefully acknowledge  the
-University of  Babylon - Iraq  for financial support  and Campus France  for the
-received support. This work is also partially funded by the Labex ACTION program
+Ali  Kadhum Idrees' PhD thesis is financially supported in part by University of Babylon (Iraq). 
+This work is also partially funded by the Labex ACTION program
 (contract ANR-11-LABX-01-01).  
  
 \bibliographystyle{gENO}