From: Karine Deschinkel Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:08:47 +0000 (+0200) Subject: ok X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/LiCO.git/commitdiff_plain/8672f2758b38ef0ee17391e8ae39be587be825c3?ds=sidebyside;hp=--cc ok --- 8672f2758b38ef0ee17391e8ae39be587be825c3 diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.aux b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.aux index 0eebcbd..c2d59c1 100644 --- a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.aux +++ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.aux @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.2.2}Active Sensors Ratio}{13}} \newlabel{figure5}{{5}{14}} \newlabel{figure6}{{6}{14}} -\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.2.3}\leavevmode {\color {blue}Energy Saving Ratio}}{14}} +\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.2.3}\leavevmode {\color {green}Energy Saving Ratio}}{14}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.2.4}Energy Consumption}{14}} \newlabel{fig5}{{7}{15}} \newlabel{figure7}{{8}{15}} diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.log b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.log index ccd5718..7fad055 100644 --- a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.log +++ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.log @@ -1,11 +1,12 @@ -This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.15 (TeX Live 2015/dev/Debian) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2015.1.24) 29 SEP 2015 11:51 +This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian) (format=pdflatex 2013.9.3) 29 SEP 2015 11:58 entering extended mode restricted \write18 enabled. %&-line parsing enabled. **articleeo.tex (./articleeo.tex -LaTeX2e <2014/05/01> -Babel <3.9l> and hyphenation patterns for 61 languages loaded. +LaTeX2e <2011/06/27> +Babel and hyphenation patterns for english, dumylang, nohyphenation, lo +aded. (./gENO2e.cls Document Class: gENO2e 2013/04/29 v4.1 Engineering Optimization LaTeX2e documen t class @@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ Package: epsfig 1999/02/16 v1.7a (e)psfig emulation (SPQR) Package: graphicx 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty -Package: keyval 2014/05/08 v1.15 key=value parser (DPC) +Package: keyval 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC) \KV@toks@=\toks20 ) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/graphics.sty @@ -233,7 +234,7 @@ LaTeX Info: Redefining \cite on input line 694. Package: rotating 1997/09/26, v2.13 Rotation package (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty -Package: ifthen 2014/09/29 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC) +Package: ifthen 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC) ) \c@r@tfl@t=\count118 \rot@float@box=\box30 @@ -261,22 +262,32 @@ Package: subfigure 2002/07/30 v2.1.4 subfigure package Package: indentfirst 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC) ) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/color.sty -Package: color 2014/04/23 v1.1a Standard LaTeX Color (DPC) +Package: color 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/latexconfig/color.cfg File: color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive ) -Package color Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 137. +Package color Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 130. ) (./algorithm2e.sty Package: algorithm2e 2008/00/00 v3.10 algorithms environments \c@AlgoLine=\count123 (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/xspace.sty -Package: xspace 2014/10/28 v1.13 Space after command names (DPC,MH) +Package: xspace 2009/10/20 v1.13 Space after command names (DPC,MH) ) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/relsize/relsize.sty -Package: relsize 2013/03/29 ver 4.1 -) +Package: relsize 2011/09/21 ver 4.0 + +Examine \normalsize starts \@setfontsize size may be \@xipt. +Examine \small starts \@setfontsize size may be \@xpt. +Examine \footnotesize starts \@setfontsize size may be \@viiipt. +Examine \large starts \@setfontsize size may be \@xipt. +Examine \Large starts \@setfontsize size may be \@xviipt. +Examine \LARGE starts \@setfontsize size may be \@xviiipt. +Examine \scriptsize starts \@setfontsize size may be \@viipt. +Examine \tiny starts \@setfontsize size may be \@vipt. +Examine \huge starts \@setfontsize size may be \@xxpt. +Examine \Huge starts \@setfontsize size may be \@xxvpt. ) ******************************************************** Package `algorithm2e' Release 4.01 -- december 14 2009 -- - algorithm2e-announce@lirmm.fr mailing list for announcement about releases @@ -405,7 +416,7 @@ LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OT1/cmr/bx/it' in size <13> not available LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OML+cmr on input line 25. (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/omlcmr.fd -File: omlcmr.fd 2014/09/29 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions +File: omlcmr.fd 1999/05/25 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions ) LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OML/cmr/m/it' in size <10> not available (Font) Font shape `OML/cmm/m/it' tried instead on input line 25. @@ -416,7 +427,7 @@ LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OML/cmr/m/it' in size <5> not available LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OMS+cmr on input line 25. (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/omscmr.fd -File: omscmr.fd 2014/09/29 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions +File: omscmr.fd 1999/05/25 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions ) LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OMS/cmr/m/n' in size <10> not available (Font) Font shape `OMS/cmsy/m/n' tried instead on input line 25. @@ -433,12 +444,12 @@ LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OMX/cmr/m/n' undefined LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msa on input line 25. (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsa.fd -File: umsa.fd 2013/01/14 v3.01 AMS symbols A +File: umsa.fd 2009/06/22 v3.00 AMS symbols A ) LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msb on input line 25. (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsb.fd -File: umsb.fd 2013/01/14 v3.01 AMS symbols B +File: umsb.fd 2009/06/22 v3.00 AMS symbols B ) LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OML/cmr/m/it' in size <8> not available (Font) Font shape `OML/cmm/m/it' tried instead on input line 25. @@ -555,10 +566,10 @@ LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OT1/cmr/bx/sc' undefined (Font) using `OT1/cmr/bx/n' instead on input line 221. Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:11:12 (epstopdf) size: 358485 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:56 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:43 (epstopdf) size: 78307 bytes (epstopdf) Command: @@ -571,10 +582,10 @@ File: figure1a-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) Package pdftex.def Info: figure1a-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 269. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 213.39566pt x 202.1362pt. Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:11:12 (epstopdf) size: 241675 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:56 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:44 (epstopdf) size: 57181 bytes (epstopdf) Command: @@ -637,10 +648,10 @@ Overfull \vbox (701.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [] [5 <./figure1a-eps-converted-to.pdf> <./figure1b-eps-converted-to.pdf>] Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:11:12 (epstopdf) size: 508784 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:57 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:44 (epstopdf) size: 138861 bytes (epstopdf) Command: @@ -654,10 +665,10 @@ File: figure2-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) Package pdftex.def Info: figure2-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 312. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 398.99872pt x 200.66864pt. Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:11:12 (epstopdf) size: 196938 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:57 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:45 (epstopdf) size: 48639 bytes (epstopdf) Command: @@ -700,10 +711,10 @@ Overfull \vbox (701.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [] [6 <./figure2-eps-converted-to.pdf>] Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:11:12 (epstopdf) size: 428048 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:58 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:45 (epstopdf) size: 76496 bytes (epstopdf) Command: @@ -895,11 +906,11 @@ Overfull \vbox (701.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [] [12] Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-06 11:42:02 (epstopdf) size: 29526 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:58 -(epstopdf) size: 12679 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:46 +(epstopdf) size: 12638 bytes (epstopdf) Command: (epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 832. @@ -916,11 +927,11 @@ Package pdftex.def Info: figure5-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 832. LaTeX Warning: `!h' float specifier changed to `!ht'. Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-06 11:42:02 (epstopdf) size: 29515 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:58 -(epstopdf) size: 12739 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:46 +(epstopdf) size: 12695 bytes (epstopdf) Command: (epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 851. @@ -964,21 +975,21 @@ Overfull \vbox (701.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [] [13] Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-28 10:36:28 (epstopdf) size: 29552 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:59 -(epstopdf) size: 12940 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-28 10:36:41 +(epstopdf) size: 12896 bytes (epstopdf) Command: -(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 877. +(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 875. Package epstopdf Info: Output file is already uptodate. File: ESR-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) -Package pdftex.def Info: ESR-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 877. +Package pdftex.def Info: ESR-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 875. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 242.40503pt x 175.15395pt. @@ -1010,38 +1021,38 @@ Overfull \vbox (701.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [] [14 <./figure5-eps-converted-to.pdf> <./figure6-eps-converted-to.pdf>] Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-06 11:42:02 (epstopdf) size: 24136 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:59 -(epstopdf) size: 8217 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:46 +(epstopdf) size: 8179 bytes (epstopdf) Command: -(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 901. +(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 899. Package epstopdf Info: Output file is already uptodate. File: figure7a-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) -Package pdftex.def Info: figure7a-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 901. +Package pdftex.def Info: figure7a-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 899. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 246.92189pt x 175.15395pt. Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-06 11:42:02 (epstopdf) size: 24138 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:59 -(epstopdf) size: 8218 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:47 +(epstopdf) size: 8180 bytes (epstopdf) Command: -(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 902. +(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 900. Package epstopdf Info: Output file is already uptodate. File: figure7b-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) -Package pdftex.def Info: figure7b-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 902. +Package pdftex.def Info: figure7b-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 900. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 246.92189pt x 175.15395pt. Underfull \vbox (badness 10000) has occurred while \output is active [] @@ -1070,38 +1081,38 @@ Overfull \vbox (701.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [] [15 <./ESR-eps-converted-to.pdf> <./figure7a-eps-converted-to.pdf> <./figure7b -eps-converted-to.pdf>] Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-06 11:42:03 (epstopdf) size: 24103 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:59 -(epstopdf) size: 8390 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:47 +(epstopdf) size: 8351 bytes (epstopdf) Command: -(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 925. +(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 923. Package epstopdf Info: Output file is already uptodate. File: figure8a-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) -Package pdftex.def Info: figure8a-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 925. +Package pdftex.def Info: figure8a-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 923. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 246.92189pt x 175.15395pt. Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-06 11:42:03 (epstopdf) size: 24855 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:22:00 -(epstopdf) size: 8505 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-02-20 10:12:47 +(epstopdf) size: 8466 bytes (epstopdf) Command: -(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 926. +(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 924. Package epstopdf Info: Output file is already uptodate. File: figure8b-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) -Package pdftex.def Info: figure8b-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 926. +Package pdftex.def Info: figure8b-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 924. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 246.92189pt x 175.15395pt. Underfull \vbox (badness 10000) has occurred while \output is active [] @@ -1129,21 +1140,21 @@ Overfull \vbox (701.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [] [16 <./figure8a-eps-converted-to.pdf> <./figure8b-eps-converted-to.pdf>] Package epstopdf Info: Source file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:21:26 +(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-28 10:13:03 (epstopdf) size: 26999 bytes (epstopdf) Output file: -(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-29 11:22:00 -(epstopdf) size: 7972 bytes +(epstopdf) date: 2015-09-28 10:24:52 +(epstopdf) size: 7928 bytes (epstopdf) Command: -(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 947. +(epstopdf) \includegraphics on input line 943. Package epstopdf Info: Output file is already uptodate. File: figure9-eps-converted-to.pdf Graphic file (type pdf) -Package pdftex.def Info: figure9-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 947. +Package pdftex.def Info: figure9-eps-converted-to.pdf used on input line 943. (pdftex.def) Requested size: 266.647pt x 192.6704pt. Underfull \vbox (badness 1337) has occurred while \output is active [] @@ -1279,13 +1290,13 @@ LaTeX Font Warning: Some font shapes were not available, defaults substituted. ) Here is how much of TeX's memory you used: - 4878 strings out of 493221 - 63675 string characters out of 6141266 - 155120 words of memory out of 5000000 - 8222 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000 - 14560 words of font info for 56 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000 - 1119 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191 - 41i,19n,27p,518b,385s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,80000s + 4871 strings out of 495059 + 63603 string characters out of 3182031 + 150043 words of memory out of 3000000 + 7964 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+200000 + 14560 words of font info for 56 fonts, out of 3000000 for 9000 + 14 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191 + 41i,19n,27p,520b,385s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,50000s -Output written on articleeo.pdf (20 pages, 762128 bytes). +Output written on articleeo.pdf (20 pages, 762281 bytes). PDF statistics: 222 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607) 151 compressed objects within 2 object streams diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.pdf b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.pdf index 753a2da..53d187b 100644 Binary files a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.pdf and b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.pdf differ diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex index 23f8cb3..b6becc3 100644 --- a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex +++ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ in the current period. Each sensor node determines its position and its subregion using an embedded GPS or a location discovery algorithm. After that, all the sensors collect position coordinates, remaining energy, sensor node ID, and the number of their one-hop live neighbors during the information exchange. -\textcolor{blue}{Both INFO packet and ActiveSleep packet contain two parts: header and data payload. The sensor ID is included in the header, where the header size is 8 bits. The data part includes position coordinates (64 bits), remaining energy (32 bits), and the number of one-hop live neighbors (8 bits). Therefore the size of the INFO packet is 112 bits. The ActiveSleep packet is 16 bits size, 8 bits for the header and 8 bits for data part that includes only sensor status (0 or 1).} +\textcolor{green}{Both INFO packet and ActiveSleep packet contain two parts: header and data payload. The sensor ID is included in the header, where the header size is 8 bits. The data part includes position coordinates (64 bits), remaining energy (32 bits), and the number of one-hop live neighbors (8 bits). Therefore the size of the INFO packet is 112 bits. The ActiveSleep packet is 16 bits size, 8 bits for the header and 8 bits for data part that includes only sensor status (0 or 1).} The sensors inside a same region cooperate to elect a leader. The selection criteria for the leader are (in order of priority): \begin{enumerate} @@ -719,8 +719,8 @@ approach. sensing period~$p$, $R$ is the number of subregions, and $|J|$ is the number of sensors in the network. -\item {\bf \textcolor{blue}{Energy Saving Ratio (ESR)}}: -\textcolor{blue}{this metric, which shows the ability of a protocol to save energy, is defined by: +\item {\bf \textcolor{green}{Energy Saving Ratio (ESR)}}: +\textcolor{green}{this metric, which shows the ability of a protocol to save energy, is defined by: \begin{equation*} \scriptsize \mbox{ESR}(\%) = \frac{\mbox{Number of alive sensors during this round}} @@ -853,12 +853,10 @@ keeping a greater coverage ratio as shown in Figure \ref{figure5}. \label{figure6} \end{figure} -\subsubsection{\textcolor{blue}{Energy Saving Ratio}} +\subsubsection{\textcolor{green}{Energy Saving Ratio}} -%\textcolor{blue}{In this experiment, we study the energy saving ratio, see Figure~\ref{fig5}, for 200 deployed nodes. -%The larger the ratio is, the more redundant sensor nodes are switched off, and consequently the longer the network may liv%e. } -\textcolor{blue}{The simulation results show that our protocol PeCO saves +\textcolor{green}{The simulation results show that our protocol PeCO saves efficiently energy by turning off some sensors during the sensing phase. As shown in Figure~\ref{fig5}, GAF provides better energy saving than PeCO for the first fifty rounds. Indeed GAF balances the energy consumption among @@ -934,14 +932,12 @@ for different coverage ratios. We denote by Protocol/70, Protocol/80, Protocol/85, Protocol/90, and Protocol/95 the amount of time during which the network can satisfy an area coverage greater than $70\%$, $80\%$, $85\%$, $90\%$, and $95\%$ respectively, where the term Protocol refers to DiLCO or -PeCO. \textcolor{blue}{Indeed there are applications that do not require a 100\% coverage of the +PeCO. \textcolor{green}{Indeed there are applications that do not require a 100\% coverage of the area to be monitored. For example, forest fire application might require complete coverage in summer seasons while only require 80$\%$ of the area to be covered in rainy seasons~\citep{li2011transforming}. As another example, birds habit study requires only 70$\%$-coverage at nighttime when the birds are sleeping while requires 100$\%$-coverage at daytime when the birds are active~\citep{1279193}. -%Mudflows monitoring applications may require part of the area to be covered in sunny days. Thus, to extend network lifetime, the coverage quality can be decreased if it is acceptable~\citep{wang2014keeping}}. PeCO always outperforms DiLCO for the three lower coverage ratios, moreover the improvements grow with the network size. DiLCO outperforms PeCO when the coverage ratio is required to be $>90\%$, but PeCO extends the network lifetime significantly when coverage ratio can be relaxed.} -%DiLCO is better for coverage ratios near 100\%, but in that case PeCO is not ineffective for the smallest network sizes. \begin{figure}[h!] \centering \includegraphics[scale=0.55]{figure9.eps} @@ -966,7 +962,7 @@ $\beta=0.4$ seems to achieve the best compromise between lifetime and coverage ratio. That explains why we have chosen this setting for the experiments presented in the previous subsections. -%As can be seen in Table~\ref{my-labelx}, it is obvious and clear that when $\alpha$ decreased and $\beta$ increased by any step, the network lifetime for $Lifetime_{50}$ increased and the $Lifetime_{95}$ decreased. Therefore, selecting the values of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ depend on the application type used in the sensor nework. In PeCO protocol, $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are chosen based on the largest value of network lifetime for $Lifetime_{95}$. + \begin{table}[h] \centering diff --git a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~ index 5ba7f55..4faafaa 100644 --- a/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~ +++ b/PeCO-EO/articleeo.tex~ @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ in the current period. Each sensor node determines its position and its subregion using an embedded GPS or a location discovery algorithm. After that, all the sensors collect position coordinates, remaining energy, sensor node ID, and the number of their one-hop live neighbors during the information exchange. -\textcolor{blue}{Both INFO packet and ActiveSleep packet contain two parts: header and data payload. The sensor ID is included in the header, where the header size is 8 bits. The data part includes position coordinates (64 bits), remaining energy (32 bits), and the number of one-hop live neighbors (8 bits). Therefore the size of the INFO packet is 112 bits. The ActiveSleep packet is 16 bits size, 8 bits for the header and 8 bits for data part that includes only sensor status (0 or 1).} +\textcolor{green}{Both INFO packet and ActiveSleep packet contain two parts: header and data payload. The sensor ID is included in the header, where the header size is 8 bits. The data part includes position coordinates (64 bits), remaining energy (32 bits), and the number of one-hop live neighbors (8 bits). Therefore the size of the INFO packet is 112 bits. The ActiveSleep packet is 16 bits size, 8 bits for the header and 8 bits for data part that includes only sensor status (0 or 1).} The sensors inside a same region cooperate to elect a leader. The selection criteria for the leader are (in order of priority): \begin{enumerate} @@ -719,8 +719,8 @@ approach. sensing period~$p$, $R$ is the number of subregions, and $|J|$ is the number of sensors in the network. -\item {\bf \textcolor{blue}{Energy Saving Ratio (ESR)}}: -\textcolor{blue}{this metric, which shows the ability of a protocol to save energy, is defined by: +\item {\bf \textcolor{green}{Energy Saving Ratio (ESR)}}: +\textcolor{green}{this metric, which shows the ability of a protocol to save energy, is defined by: \begin{equation*} \scriptsize \mbox{ESR}(\%) = \frac{\mbox{Number of alive sensors during this round}} @@ -853,26 +853,20 @@ keeping a greater coverage ratio as shown in Figure \ref{figure5}. \label{figure6} \end{figure} -\subsubsection{\textcolor{blue}{Energy Saving Ratio (ESR)}} - -%\textcolor{blue}{In this experiment, we study the energy saving ratio, see Figure~\ref{fig5}, for 200 deployed nodes. -%The larger the ratio is, the more redundant sensor nodes are switched off, and consequently the longer the network may liv%e. } - -\textcolor{blue}{The simulation results show that our protocol PeCO allows to - efficiently save energy by turning off some sensors during the sensing phase. - As shown in Figure~\ref{fig5}, GAF provides better energy saving than PeCO for - the first fifty rounds, because GAF balances the energy consumption among - sensor nodes inside each small fixed grid and thus permits to extend the life of - sensors in each grid fairly but in the same time turn on large number of - sensors during sensing that lead later to quickly deplete sensor's batteries - together. After that GAF provide less energy saving compared with other - approaches because of the large number of dead nodes. DESK algorithm shows less - energy saving compared with other approaches due to activate a large number of - sensors during the sensing. DiLCO protocol provides less energy saving ratio - compared with PeCO because it generally activate a larger number of sensor - nodes during sensing. Note that again as the number of rounds increases PeCO - becomes the most performing one, since it consumes less energy compared with - other approaches.} +\subsubsection{\textcolor{green}{Energy Saving Ratio}} + + +\textcolor{green}{The simulation results show that our protocol PeCO saves + efficiently energy by turning off some sensors during the sensing phase. As + shown in Figure~\ref{fig5}, GAF provides better energy saving than PeCO for + the first fifty rounds. Indeed GAF balances the energy consumption among + sensor nodes inside each small fixed grid and thus permits to extend the life + of sensors in each grid fairly. However, at the same time it turns on a large + number of sensors and that leads later to quickly deplete sensor's batteries. + DESK algorithm shows less energy saving compared with other approaches. In + comparison with PeCO, DiLCO protocol usually provides lower energy saving + ratios. Moreover, it can be noticed that after round fifty, PeCO protocol + exhibits the slowest decrease among all the considered protocols.} \begin{figure}[h!] %\centering @@ -881,9 +875,7 @@ keeping a greater coverage ratio as shown in Figure \ref{figure5}. \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{ESR.eps} %\\~ ~ ~(a) \caption{Energy Saving Ratio for 200 deployed nodes} \label{fig5} -\end{figure} - - +\end{figure} \subsubsection{Energy Consumption} @@ -940,14 +932,12 @@ for different coverage ratios. We denote by Protocol/70, Protocol/80, Protocol/85, Protocol/90, and Protocol/95 the amount of time during which the network can satisfy an area coverage greater than $70\%$, $80\%$, $85\%$, $90\%$, and $95\%$ respectively, where the term Protocol refers to DiLCO or -PeCO. \textcolor{blue}{Indeed there are applications that do not require a 100\% coverage of the +PeCO. \textcolor{green}{Indeed there are applications that do not require a 100\% coverage of the area to be monitored. For example, forest fire application might require complete coverage in summer seasons while only require 80$\%$ of the area to be covered in rainy seasons~\citep{li2011transforming}. As another example, birds habit study requires only 70$\%$-coverage at nighttime when the birds are sleeping while requires 100$\%$-coverage at daytime when the birds are active~\citep{1279193}. -%Mudflows monitoring applications may require part of the area to be covered in sunny days. Thus, to extend network lifetime, the coverage quality can be decreased if it is acceptable~\citep{wang2014keeping}}. PeCO always outperforms DiLCO for the three lower coverage ratios, moreover the -improvements grow with the network size. DiLCO outperforms PeCO when the coverage ratio is required to be $>90\%$, but PeCo extends the network lifetime significantly when coverage ratio can be relaxed.} -%DiLCO is better for coverage ratios near 100\%, but in that case PeCO is not ineffective for the smallest network sizes. +improvements grow with the network size. DiLCO outperforms PeCO when the coverage ratio is required to be $>90\%$, but PeCO extends the network lifetime significantly when coverage ratio can be relaxed.} \begin{figure}[h!] \centering \includegraphics[scale=0.55]{figure9.eps} diff --git a/PeCO-EO/reponse2.tex b/PeCO-EO/reponse2.tex index c695a98..2c4b47d 100644 --- a/PeCO-EO/reponse2.tex +++ b/PeCO-EO/reponse2.tex @@ -28,20 +28,15 @@ \bigskip \begin{center} -Detailed changes and addressed issues in the revision of the article - -``Perimeter-based Coverage Optimization \\ -to Improve Lifetime in Wireless Sensor Networks''\\ +Revision of the manuscript ``Perimeter-based Coverage Optimization to Improve Lifetime in Wireless Sensor Networks''\\ by Ali Kadhum Idrees, Karine Deschinkel, Michel Salomon and Raph\"ael Couturier \medskip \end{center} -Dear Editor and Reviewers, - - -Comments (here in red color) raised by the reviewer n\textsuperscript{o}1 after a first revision have been carefully considered. Please find below our answers highlighted in green. We did our best to satisfy your requests. +Dear Editor and Reviewers,\\ +Comments (here in red color) raised by the reviewer n\textsuperscript{o}1 after a first revision have been carefully considered. Please find below our answers highlighted in green. We also highlighted the changes we made in the manuscript by using coloured text. We did our best to satisfy your requests. %Journal: Engineering Optimization %Reviewer's Comment to the Author Manuscript id GENO-2015-0094