o

[Sensornets15.git] / ahswn.tex

diff --git a/ahswn.tex b/ahswn.tex
index e2ef23ca1a5a2d014310c1c10f4e58ad503803b8..d66df5defd510a10e70ea3816d8166aae6896b5b 100644 (file)
--- a/ahswn.tex
+++ b/ahswn.tex
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 \r
 \institute{FEMTO-ST Institute, UMR 6174 CNRS, University of Franche-Comt\'e, France}\r
 \r
-\def\received{Received 21 October 2014}\r
+\def\received{Received 23 October 2014}\r
 \r
 \maketitle\r
 \r
@@ -437,19 +437,20 @@ experimental results  which are relevant. The  nodes are deployed on  a field of
 interest of $(50 \times 25)~m^2 $ in such a way that they cover the field with a\r
 high coverage ratio.\r
 \r
-We  chose as  energy  consumption  model the  one  proposed proposed  \linebreak\r
-by~\cite{ChinhVu}  and   based  on  ~\cite{raghunathan2002energy}   with  slight\r
-modifications. The energy  consumed by the communications is  added and the part\r
-relative to a  variable sensing range is removed. We also  assume that the nodes\r
-have   the   characteristics   of   the   Medusa   II   sensor   node   platform\r
-\cite{raghunathan2002energy}.  A sensor node typically consists of four units: a\r
-MicroController Unit, an Atmels AVR ATmega103L  in case of Medusa II, to perform\r
-the  computations;  a  communication  (radio)  unit able  to  send  and  receive\r
-messages; a  sensing unit  to collect  data; a power  supply which  provides the\r
-energy consumed by node. Except the  battery, all the other unit can be switched\r
-off to save energy according  to the node status.  Table~\ref{table4} summarizes\r
-the energy consumed (in milliWatt per second) by a node for each of its possible\r
-status.\r
+We   chose   as   energy    consumption   model   the   one   proposed\r
+by~\cite{ChinhVu}  and  based  on  ~\cite{raghunathan2002energy}  with\r
+slight  modifications. The  energy consumed  by the  communications is\r
+added and the part relative to a variable sensing range is removed. We\r
+also assume that  the nodes have the characteristics  of the Medusa II\r
+sensor  node  platform  \cite{raghunathan2002energy}.  A  sensor  node\r
+typically consists  of four units:  a MicroController Unit,  an Atmels\r
+AVR ATmega103L  in case of Medusa  II, to perform  the computations; a\r
+communication  (radio)  unit able  to  send  and  receive messages;  a\r
+sensing unit to collect data; a power supply which provides the energy\r
+consumed  by node.  Except  the battery,  all  the other  unit can  be\r
+switched   off  to  save   energy  according   to  the   node  status.\r
+Table~\ref{table4}  summarizes the energy  consumed (in  milliWatt per\r
+second) by a node for each of its possible status.\r
 \r
 \begin{table}\r
 \caption{Energy consumption model.}\r
@@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ the efficiency of our approach:
   where  $n$ is  the number  of covered  grid points  by active  sensors  of every\r
   subregions during  the current  sensing phase  and $N$ is the total number  of grid\r
   points in  the sensing field. In  our simulations, we have  a layout of  $N = 51\r
-  \times 26 = 1326$ grid points.\r
+  \times 26 = 1,326$ grid points.\r
 \r
 \item {{\bf  Energy Consumption}:}  energy consumption (EC)  can be seen  as the\r
   total amount of  energy   consumed   by   the   sensors   during   $Lifetime_{95}$   \r
@@ -591,7 +592,7 @@ nodes, and thus enables the extension of the lifetime.
 \begin{center}\r
 \scalebox{0.5}{\includegraphics{R/CR.pdf}}\r
 \end{center}\r
-\caption{Coverage ratio}\r
+\caption{Coverage ratio.}\r
 \label{fig3}\r
 \end{figure} \r
 \r