X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/Sensornets15.git/blobdiff_plain/908d92d35c6d3bbfa53a7a317dbecd6ebbd01bbe..adfc595bdcc2431702fad39690cd8b79e66a9dc7:/Example.tex diff --git a/Example.tex b/Example.tex index bd29ee6..ec92390 100644 --- a/Example.tex +++ b/Example.tex @@ -168,11 +168,6 @@ used~\cite{castano2013column,rossi2012exact,deschinkel2012column}. {\it In DiLC \cite{pedraza2006} where the objective is to maximize the number of cover sets.} -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= - - ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \section{\uppercase{Description of the DiLCO protocol}} \label{sec:The DiLCO Protocol Description} @@ -182,10 +177,7 @@ on each subregion in the area of interest. It is based on two efficient techniques: network leader election and sensor activity scheduling for coverage preservation and energy conservation, applied periodically to efficiently maximize the lifetime in the network. -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \subsection{Assumptions and models} @@ -280,12 +272,6 @@ to each sensor in the same subregion to indicate it if it has to be active or not. Alternately, if the sensor is not the leader, it will wait for the Active-Sleep packet to know its state for the coming sensing phase. -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= - - - ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \begin{algorithm}[h!] @@ -548,8 +534,7 @@ the efficiency of our approach: connectivity is crucial because an active sensor node without connectivity towards a base station cannot transmit any information regarding an observed event in the area that it monitors. - - + \item {{\bf Coverage Ratio (CR)}:} it measures how well the WSN is able to observe the area of interest. In our case, we discretized the sensor field as a regular grid, which yields the following equation to compute the @@ -562,15 +547,6 @@ where $n$ is the number of covered grid points by active sensors of every subregions during the current sensing phase and $N$ is the total number of grid points in the sensing field. In our simulations, we have a layout of $N = 51 \times 26 = 1326$ grid points. -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= -%The accuracy of this method depends on the distance between grids. In our -%simulations, the sensing field has been divided into 50 by 25 grid points, which means -%there are $51 \times 26~ = ~ 1326$ points in total. -% Therefore, for our simulations, the error in the coverage calculation is less than ~ 1 $\% $. - - ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \item {{\bf Energy Consumption}:} energy consumption (EC) can be seen as the total amount of energy consumed by the sensors during $Lifetime_{95}$ or @@ -593,12 +569,7 @@ refers to the energy needed by all the leader nodes to solve the integer program during a period. Finally, $E^a_{m}$ and $E^s_{m}$ indicate the energy consumed by the whole network in the sensing phase (active and sleeping nodes). -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= - - ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \end{itemize} %\end{enumerate} @@ -650,10 +621,7 @@ nodes, and thus enables the extension of the network lifetime. \label{fig3} \end{figure} -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \subsubsection{Energy consumption} Based on the results shown in Figure~\ref{fig3}, we focus on the DiLCO-16 and @@ -713,10 +681,6 @@ prevents it to ensure a good coverage especially on the borders of subregions. Thus, the optimal number of subregions can be seen as a trade-off between execution time and coverage performance. -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= - ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \subsubsection{Network lifetime} In the next figure, the network lifetime is illustrated. Obviously, the lifetime @@ -740,11 +704,7 @@ DESK and GAF for the lifetime of the network. More specifically, if we focus on the larger level of coverage ($95\%$) in the case of our protocol, the subdivision in $16$~subregions seems to be the most appropriate. -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= - ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \section{\uppercase{Conclusion and future work}} \label{sec:Conclusion and Future Works} @@ -771,11 +731,6 @@ there is an optimal number of subregions. Therefore, in case of our simulation context a subdivision in $16$~subregions seems to be the most relevant. The optimal number of subregions will be investigated in the future. -<<<<<<< HEAD -======= - - ->>>>>>> ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba \section*{\uppercase{Acknowledgements}} \noindent As a Ph.D. student, Ali Kadhum IDREES would like to gratefully