From: Karine Deschinkel Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:20:45 +0000 (+0200) Subject: modif mineure X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/Sensornets15.git/commitdiff_plain/9049bab3a33bff06fa04994940cb18bf9a00b9cf modif mineure --- diff --git a/Example.tex b/Example.tex index 4907bf5..fe40099 100644 --- a/Example.tex +++ b/Example.tex @@ -44,8 +44,7 @@ the coverage and to improve the lifetime in wireless sensor networks is proposed. The area of interest is first divided into subregions using a divide-and-conquer method and then the DiLCO protocol is distributed on the sensor nodes in each subregion. The DiLCO combines two efficient techniques: -leader election for each subregion, followed by an optimization-based planning -of activity scheduling decisions for each subregion. The proposed DiLCO works +leader election for each subregion, followed by an optimization-based activity scheduling for each subregion. The proposed DiLCO works into periods during which a small number of nodes, remaining active for sensing, is selected to ensure coverage so as to maximize the lifetime of wireless sensor network. Each period consists of four phases: (i)~Information Exchange, @@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ problem. By using this model, they are proposed an Energy-Efficient central-Sc The work in~\cite{cheng2014achieving} presented a unified sensing architecture for duty cycled sensor networks, called uSense, which comprises three ideas: Asymmetric Architecture, Generic Switching and Global Scheduling. The objective is to provide a flexible and efficient coverage in sensor networks. - In~\cite{ling2009energy}, The lifetime of + In~\cite{ling2009energy}, the lifetime of a sensor node is divided into epochs. At each epoch, the base station deduces the current sensing coverage requirement from application or user request. It then applies the heuristic algorithm in order to produce the set of active nodes which take the mission of sensing during the current epoch. After that, the produced schedule is sent to the sensor nodes in the network. @@ -289,7 +288,7 @@ There are five status for each sensor node in the network : %\end{enumerate} %Below, we describe each phase in more details. Algorithm 1 gives a brief description of the protocol applied by each sensor node (denoted by $s_j$ for a sensor node indexed by $j$). -Initially, the sensor node checks its remaining energy in order to participate in the current period. Each sensor node determines its position and its subregion based Embedded GPS or Location Discovery Algorithm. After that, all the sensors collect position coordinates, remaining energy $RE_j$, sensor node id, and the number of its one-hop live neighbors during the information exchange. +Initially, the sensor node checks its remaining energy in order to participate in the current period. After that, all the sensors collect position coordinates, remaining energy $RE_j$, sensor node id, and the number of its one-hop live neighbors during the information exchange. Then all the sensor nodes in the same subregion will select the leader based on the received informations. The selection criteria for the leader in order of priority are: larger number of neighbours, larger remaining energy, and then in case of equality, larger index. After that, if the sensor node is leader, it will execute the integer program algorithm (see section~\ref{cp}) which provides a set of sensors planned to be active in the sensing round. As leader, it will send an Active-Sleep packet to each sensor in the same subregion to indicate it if it has to be active or not. On the contrary, if the sensor is not the leader, it will wait for the Active-Sleep packet to know its state for the sensing round. @@ -348,7 +347,7 @@ we first show the pseudo-code of DiLCO protocol, which is executed by each senso \BlankLine %\emph{Initialize the sensor node and determine it's position and subregion} \; - \If{ $RE_j \geq E_{R}$ }{ + \If{ $RE_j \geq E_{th}$ }{ \emph{$s_j.status$ = COMMUNICATION}\; \emph{Send $INFO()$ packet to other nodes in the subregion}\; \emph{Wait $INFO()$ packet from other nodes in the subregion}\; @@ -629,7 +628,7 @@ transmit information on an event in the area that it monitors. Energy Consumption (EC) can be seen as the total energy consumed by the sensors during the $Lifetime95$ or $Lifetime50$ divided by the number of periods. The EC can be computed as follow: \\ \begin{equation*} \scriptsize -\mbox{EC} = \frac{\sum\limits_{m=1}^{M_L} \left( E^{\mbox{com}}_m+E^{\mbox{list}}_m+E^{\mbox{comp}}_m + E^{a}+E^{s} \right)}{M_L}, +\mbox{EC} = \frac{\sum\limits_{m=1}^{M} \left( E^{\mbox{com}}_m+E^{\mbox{list}}_m+E^{\mbox{comp}}_m + E^{a}+E^{s} \right)}{M_L}, \end{equation*} %\begin{equation*} @@ -637,7 +636,7 @@ transmit information on an event in the area that it monitors. %\mbox{EC} = \frac{\mbox{$\sum\limits_{d=1}^D E^c_d$}}{\mbox{$D$}} + \frac{\mbox{$\sum\limits_{d=1}^D %E^l_d$}}{\mbox{$D$}} + \frac{\mbox{$\sum\limits_{d=1}^D E^a_d$}}{\mbox{$D$}} + %\frac{\mbox{$\sum\limits_{d=1}^D E^s_d$}}{\mbox{$D$}}. %\end{equation*} -where $M_L$ corresponds to the number of periods. The total energy consumed by the sensors +where $M$ corresponds to the number of periods. The total energy consumed by the sensors (EC) comes through taking into consideration four main energy factors. The first one , denoted $E^{\scriptsize \mbox{com}}_m$, represent the energy consumption spent by all the nodes for wireless communications during period $m$. @@ -645,7 +644,7 @@ $E^{\scriptsize \mbox{list}}_m$, the next factor, corresponds to the energy consumed by the sensors in LISTENING status before receiving the decision to go active or sleep in period $m$. $E^{\scriptsize \mbox{comp}}_m$ refers to the energy needed by all the leader nodes to solve the integer program during a -period. Finally, $E^a_{m}$ and $E^s_{m}$ indicate the energy consummed by the whole network in the sensing round. +period. Finally, $E^a_{m}$ and $E^s_{m}$ indicate the energy consumed by the whole network in the sensing round. \iffalse \item {{\bf Execution Time}:} a sensor node has limited energy resources and computing power, @@ -673,7 +672,7 @@ Our method is compared with other two approaches. The first approach, called DES \subsubsection{Coverage Ratio} -In this experiment, Figure~\ref{fig3} shows the average coverage ratio for 150 deployed nodes. +Figure~\ref{fig3} shows the average coverage ratio for 150 deployed nodes. \parskip 0pt \begin{figure}[h!] \centering