From: raphael couturier <couturie@extinction>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:25:20 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: new
X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/Sensornets15.git/commitdiff_plain/ec736a6c4605ef475156098f1b75d72120a294ba?ds=inline;hp=c35114ab237b0488ab602957292a66784de10953

new
---

diff --git a/Example.aux b/Example.aux
index f802ea6..6d02c42 100644
--- a/Example.aux
+++ b/Example.aux
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@
 \newlabel{fig3}{{2}{6}}
 \newlabel{fig95}{{3}{7}}
 \newlabel{fig8}{{4}{7}}
-\newlabel{figLT95}{{5}{7}}
 \bibstyle{apalike}
 \bibdata{Example}
 \bibcite{berman04}{Berman and Calinescu, 2004}
@@ -60,6 +59,7 @@
 \bibcite{kim2013maximum}{Kim and Cobb, 2013}
 \bibcite{Kumar:2005}{Kumar et\nobreakspace  {}al., 2005}
 \bibcite{li2013survey}{Li and Vasilakos, 2013}
+\newlabel{figLT95}{{5}{8}}
 \newlabel{sec:Conclusion and Future Works}{{6}{8}}
 \bibcite{ling2009energy}{Ling and Znati, 2009}
 \bibcite{pujari2011high}{Manju and Pujari, 2011}
diff --git a/Example.tex b/Example.tex
index db1b822..d865963 100644
--- a/Example.tex
+++ b/Example.tex
@@ -702,7 +702,6 @@ prevents it  to  ensure a  good  coverage   especially  on   the  borders   of
 subregions. Thus,  the optimal number of  subregions can be seen  as a trade-off
 between execution time and coverage performance.
 
-%The DiLCO-32 has more suitable times in the same time it turn on redundent nodes more.  We think that in distributed fashion the solving of the  optimization problem in a subregion can be tackled by sensor nodes. Overall, to be able to deal  with very large networks,  a distributed method is clearly required.
 
 \subsubsection{Network lifetime}