X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/ThesisAli.git/blobdiff_plain/906798a11837d58c5c67e336737c965f10f52362..396b3d0c06b453c33e2a3a7e0aa81187f1df9880:/CHAPITRE_05.tex diff --git a/CHAPITRE_05.tex b/CHAPITRE_05.tex index 7cf8725..918ec90 100644 --- a/CHAPITRE_05.tex +++ b/CHAPITRE_05.tex @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ The difference with MuDiLCO in that the elected leader in each subregion is for each round of the sensing phase. Each sensing phase is itself divided into $T$ rounds and for each round a set of sensors (a cover set) is responsible for the sensing task. %Each sensor node in the subregion will receive an ActiveSleep packet from leader, informing it to stay awake or to go to sleep for each round of the sensing phase. Algorithm~\ref{alg:MuDiLCO}, which will be executed by each node at the beginning of a period, explains how the ActiveSleep packet is obtained. In this way, a multiround optimization process is performed during each -period after Information~Exchange and Leader~Election phases, in order to produce $T$ cover sets that will take the mission of sensing for $T$ rounds. \textcolor{blue}{The flowchart of MuDiLCO protocol executed in each sensor node is presented in Figure \ref{flow5}.} +period after Information~Exchange and Leader~Election phases, in order to produce $T$ cover sets that will take the mission of sensing for $T$ rounds. The flowchart of MuDiLCO protocol executed in each sensor node is presented in Figure \ref{flow5}. \begin{figure}[ht!] \centering