extraction améliorée, ajout de mesure de qualité sur lena et quelques typos

[canny.git] / experiments.tex

diff --git a/experiments.tex b/experiments.tex
index 9da4704046665ae6980ba9ba7ff4a47273f45ba0..8337d556b9ac715c1a7515c53a10eb84d173fd8a 100644 (file)
--- a/experiments.tex
+++ b/experiments.tex
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ this set of cover images since this paper is more focused on
 the methodology than benchmarking.    
 Our approach is always compared to Hugo~\cite{DBLP:conf/ih/PevnyFB10}
 and to EAISLSBMR~\cite{Luo:2010:EAI:1824719.1824720}.
-The former is the less detectable information hidding tool in spatial domain 
+The former is the less detectable information hiding tool in spatial domain 
 and the later is the work which is close to ours, as far as we know. 
 
 
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ The first one is widely used but does not take into
 account the Human Visual System (HVS).
 The other ones have been designed to tackle this problem.
 
+If we apply them on the running example, 
+the PSNR, PSNR-HVS-M, and wPSNR values are respectively equal to 
+68.39, 79.85, and 89.71 for the stego Lena when $b$ is equal to 7.
+If $b$ is 6, these values are respectively equal to 
+65.43, 77.2, and 89.35.
+