X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/canny.git/blobdiff_plain/e477428ed31d945b364bd9064476c1f0a34f86ef..a0f4d76521ca0d84f0de9ba71ecb094fc9e1af33:/experiments.tex?ds=inline

diff --git a/experiments.tex b/experiments.tex
index 9da4704..8337d55 100644
--- a/experiments.tex
+++ b/experiments.tex
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ this set of cover images since this paper is more focused on
 the methodology than benchmarking.    
 Our approach is always compared to Hugo~\cite{DBLP:conf/ih/PevnyFB10}
 and to EAISLSBMR~\cite{Luo:2010:EAI:1824719.1824720}.
-The former is the less detectable information hidding tool in spatial domain 
+The former is the less detectable information hiding tool in spatial domain 
 and the later is the work which is close to ours, as far as we know. 
 
 
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ The first one is widely used but does not take into
 account the Human Visual System (HVS).
 The other ones have been designed to tackle this problem.
 
+If we apply them on the running example, 
+the PSNR, PSNR-HVS-M, and wPSNR values are respectively equal to 
+68.39, 79.85, and 89.71 for the stego Lena when $b$ is equal to 7.
+If $b$ is 6, these values are respectively equal to 
+65.43, 77.2, and 89.35.
+