X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/canny.git/blobdiff_plain/fdf9d8855582d89072dcd1339af9f5b74a167ac6..e1408e22528148d27bf1cc1edc56764345c64cba:/experiments.tex?ds=inline diff --git a/experiments.tex b/experiments.tex index a79b1d4..cd2ed1a 100644 --- a/experiments.tex +++ b/experiments.tex @@ -1,18 +1,70 @@ +\subsection{Adaptive Embedding Rate} + +Two strategies have been developed in our scheme with respect to the rate of +embedding which is either \emph{ adaptive} or \emph{fixed}. + +In the former the embedding rate depends on the number of edge pixels. +The higher it is, the larger is the message length that can be considered. +Practically, a set of edge pixels is computed according to the +Canny algorithm with high threshold. +The message length is thus defined to be the half of this set cardinality. +The rate between available bits and bit message length is then more than two.This constraint is indeed induced by the fact that the efficiency +of the STC algorithm is unsatisfactory under that threshold. + + +In the latter, the embedding rate is defined as a percentage between the +number of the modified pixels and the length of the bit message. +This is the classical approach adopted in steganography. +Practically, the Canny algorithm generates a +a set of edge pixels with threshold that is decreasing until its cardinality +is sufficient. If the set cardinality is more than twice larger than the +bit message length an STC step is again applied. +Otherwise, pixels are randomly chosen from the set of pixels to build the +subset with a given size. The BBS PRNG is again applied there. + + + \subsection{Image Quality} The visual quality of the STABYLO scheme is evaluated in this section. -Three metrics are computed in these experiments : +Four metrics are computed in these experiments: the Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), -the PSNR-HVS-M~\cite{PSECAL07,psnrhvsm11} and the BIQI~\cite{MB10,biqi11}. +the PSNR-HVS-M family~\cite{PSECAL07,psnrhvsm11} , +the BIQI~\cite{MB10,biqi11} and +the weighted PSNR (wPSNR)~\cite{DBLP:conf/ih/PereiraVMMP01}. The first one is widely used but does not take into account Human Visual System (HVS). -The two last ones have been designed to tackle this problem. +The other last ones have been designed to tackle this problem. +\begin{table} +\begin{center} +\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} +\hline +Embedding rate & Adaptive & 10 \% \\ +\hline +PSNR & 66.55 & 61.86 \\ +\hline +PSNR-HVS-M & 78.6 & 72.9 \\ +\hline +BIQI & 28.3 & 28.4 \\ +\hline +wPSNR & 86.43& 77.47 \\ +\hline +\end{tabular} +\end{center} +\caption{Quality measures of our steganography approach\label{table:quality}} +\end{table} -biqi = 28.3 -psnr-hvs-m= 78,6 -psnr-hvs= 67.3 +Let us compare the STABYLO approach with other edge based steganography +schemes with respect to the image quality. +Fist off all, wPSNR and PSNR of the Edge Adaptive +scheme detailed in~\cite{Luo:2010:EAI:1824719.1824720} are lower than ours. +Next both the approaches~\cite{DBLP:journals/eswa/ChenCL10,Chang20101286} +focus on increasing the payload while the PSNR is acceptable, but do not +give quality metrics for fixed embedding rate from a large base of images. +Our approach outperforms the former thanks to the introduction of the STC +algorithm. \subsection{Steganalysis} @@ -35,4 +87,26 @@ can be a favourably executed thanks to an Ensemble Classifiers. -\JFC{Raphael, il faut donner des résultats ici} \ No newline at end of file +\begin{table} +\begin{center} +\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} +\hline +Schemes & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{STABYLO} & HUGO\\ +\hline +Embedding rate & Adaptive & 10 \% & 10 \%\\ +\hline +AUMP & 0.39 & 0.22 & 0.50 \\ +\hline +Ensemble Classifier & 0.47 & 0.35 & 0.48 \\ + +\hline +\end{tabular} +\end{center} +\caption{Steganalysing STABYLO\label{table:steganalyse}} +\end{table} + + +Results show that our approach is more easily detectable than HUGO which is +is the more secure steganography tool, as far we know. However due to its +huge number of features integration, it is not lightweight. +