X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/canny.git/blobdiff_plain/ff62ab9a78e83759f5e40e3b7d422fddeb45115d..refs/heads/master:/experiments.tex diff --git a/experiments.tex b/experiments.tex index 6d65b81..aa49e84 100644 --- a/experiments.tex +++ b/experiments.tex @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ $$ \hline \end{array} $$ -\caption{Matrix Generator for $\hat{H}$ in STC}\label{table:matrices:H} +\caption{Matrix Generator for $\hat{H}$ in STC.}\label{table:matrices:H} \end{table} @@ -150,11 +150,11 @@ The steganalysis quality of our approach has been evaluated through the % two Ensemble Classifier~\cite{DBLP:journals/tifs/KodovskyFH12} based steganalyser. Its particularization to spatial domain is considered as state of the art steganalysers. -\JFC{Features that are embedded into this steganalysis process +Features that are embedded into this steganalysis process are CCPEV and SPAM features as described in~\cite{DBLP:dblp_conf/mediaforensics/KodovskyPF10}. -These one are extracted from the -set of cover images and the set of training images.} +They are extracted from the +set of cover images and the set of training images. Next a small set of weak classifiers is randomly built, each one working on a subspace of all the features. @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Ensemble Classifier & 0.35 & 0.44 & 0.47 & 0.47 & 0.48 & 0.49 & 0.43 & 0 \end{tabular} \end{small} \end{center} -\caption{Steganalysing STABYLO\label{table:steganalyse}} +\caption{Steganalysing STABYLO\label{table:steganalyse}.} \end{table*} @@ -215,14 +215,22 @@ However due to its huge number of integration features, it is not lightweight. All these numerical experiments confirm the objective presented in the motivations: -providing an efficient steganography approach in a lightweight manner. - -\RC{In Figure~\ref{fig:error}, Ensemble Classifier has been used with all the previsou steganalizers with 3 different payloads. It can be observed that with important payload, STABYLO is not efficient, but as mentionned its complexity is far more simple compared to other tools.\\ +providing an efficient steganography approach in a lightweight manner +for small payload. + +In Figure~\ref{fig:error}, +Ensemble Classifier has been used with all the previous +steganographic schemes with 4 different payloads. +It can be observed that face to high values of payload, +STABYLO is definitely not secure enough. +However thanks to an efficient very low-complexity (Fig.\ref{fig:compared}), +we argue that the user should embed tiny messages in many images +than a larger message in only one image. \begin{figure} \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{error} \end{center} -\caption{Error obtained by Ensemble classifier with WOW/UNIWARD, HUGO, and STABYLO and different paylaods.} +\caption{Testing errors obtained by Ensemble classifier with +WOW/UNIWARD, HUGO, and STABYLO w.r.t. payload.} \label{fig:error} \end{figure} -}