From 337a82cd19a074b2bb9c3a50d71ec0d31587e768 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bassam al-kindy Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:30:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] updated --- annotated.tex | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/annotated.tex b/annotated.tex index 8cc8016..46619ab 100644 --- a/annotated.tex +++ b/annotated.tex @@ -264,8 +264,8 @@ core genes with its two genomes parents. \caption{Extract Maximum Intersection Score} \label{Alg1:ICM} \begin{algorithmic} -\REQUIRE $L \leftarrow \text{genomes vectors}$ -\ENSURE $B1 \leftarrow Max Core Vector$ +\REQUIRE $L \leftarrow \text{genomes sets}$ +\ENSURE $B1 \leftarrow \text{Max Core set}$ \FOR{$i \leftarrow 0:len(L)-1$} \STATE $score \leftarrow 0$ \STATE $core1 \leftarrow set(GenomeList[L[i]])$ @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ names\_Accession number)}, while an edge is labeled with the number of lost genes from a leaf genome or an intermediate core gene. Such numbers are very interesting because they give an information about the evolution: how many genes were lost between two species whether -they belong to the same familie or not. By the principle of +they belong to the same family or not. By the principle of classification, a small number of genes lost among species indicates that those species are close to each other and belong to same family, while a large lost means that we have an evolutionary relationship -- 2.39.5