From debf111706b70afb07c75b550973fa71fc2dcbce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bassam al-kindy <bassam.al-kindy@lifc>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:45:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] update time table

---
 annotated.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/annotated.tex b/annotated.tex
index 90ca53a..ad0f654 100644
--- a/annotated.tex
+++ b/annotated.tex
@@ -355,12 +355,12 @@ The second important factor is the amount of memory usage in each methodology. T
 \caption{Memory usages in (MB) for each methodology}\label{mem}
 \begin{tabular}{p{2.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1cm}p{1cm}p{1cm}p{1cm}p{1cm}p{1cm}}
 \hline\hline
-Method& & Load Gen. & Conv. gV & Read gV & ICM & Gen. tree & Core Seq. \\
+Method& & Load Gen. & Conv. gV & Read gV & ICM & Core tree & Core Seq. \\
 \hline
 Gene prediction & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~\\
 \multirow{2}{*}{Gene Features} & NCBI & 15.4 & 18.9 & 17.5 & 18 & 18 & 28.1\\
               & DOGMA& 15.3 & 15.3 & 16.8 & 17.8 & 17.9 & 31.2\\
-Gene Quality  & ~ & 15.3 & $\le$2.7G & 16.1 & 17 & 17.1 & 24.4\\ 
+Gene Quality  & ~ & 15.3 & $\le$3G & 16.1 & 17 & 17.1 & 24.4\\ 
 \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{table}
-- 
2.39.5