quelques typos

[desynchronisation-controle.git] / IWCMC14 / argmin.tex

diff --git a/IWCMC14/argmin.tex b/IWCMC14/argmin.tex
index 567785671da45be949653dce77b7549fd0dae131..9a20c42befc2e195e492a99a7ff765ac30922f5c 100644 (file)
--- a/IWCMC14/argmin.tex
+++ b/IWCMC14/argmin.tex
@@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ $$
 \end{table*}
 
 
 \end{table*}
 
 

-This improvment has been evaluated on a set of experiments.
-For 10 tresholds $t$, such that $1E-5 \le t \le 1E-3$, we have 
-executed 10 times the aproach detailled before either with the new 
+This improvement has been evaluated on a set of experiments.
+For 10 thresholds $t$, such that $1E-5 \le t \le 1E-3$, we have 
+executed 10 times the approach detailed before either with the new 

 gradient calculus or with the original argmin one. 
 The Table~\ref{Table:argmin:time} summarizes the averages of these 
 gradient calculus or with the original argmin one. 
 The Table~\ref{Table:argmin:time} summarizes the averages of these 

-excution times, given in seconds. We remark time spent with the gradient 
+execution times, given in seconds. We remark time spent with the gradient 

 approach is about 37 times smaller than the one of the argmin one.
 approach is about 37 times smaller than the one of the argmin one.

-Among implementations of argmin aproaches, we have retained 
+Among implementations of argmin approaches, we have retained 

 the COBYLA one since it does not require any gradient to be executed.
 
 \begin{table*}
 the COBYLA one since it does not require any gradient to be executed.
 
 \begin{table*}


@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ the COBYLA one since it does not require any gradient to be executed.
 $$
 \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
 \hline
 $$
 \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
 \hline

-\textrm{Convergence Treshold} &
+\textrm{Convergence Threshold} &

 10^{-5} &
 1.67.10^{-5} &
 2.78.10^{-5} &
 10^{-5} &
 1.67.10^{-5} &
 2.78.10^{-5} &