X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/desynchronisation-controle.git/blobdiff_plain/fe438aa764b5d1ad7ea61512cffbb3761eff99b7..refs/heads/master:/IWCMC14/argmin.tex

diff --git a/IWCMC14/argmin.tex b/IWCMC14/argmin.tex
index 5677856..9a20c42 100644
--- a/IWCMC14/argmin.tex
+++ b/IWCMC14/argmin.tex
@@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ $$
 \end{table*}
 
 
-This improvment has been evaluated on a set of experiments.
-For 10 tresholds $t$, such that $1E-5 \le t \le 1E-3$, we have 
-executed 10 times the aproach detailled before either with the new 
+This improvement has been evaluated on a set of experiments.
+For 10 thresholds $t$, such that $1E-5 \le t \le 1E-3$, we have 
+executed 10 times the approach detailed before either with the new 
 gradient calculus or with the original argmin one. 
 The Table~\ref{Table:argmin:time} summarizes the averages of these 
-excution times, given in seconds. We remark time spent with the gradient 
+execution times, given in seconds. We remark time spent with the gradient 
 approach is about 37 times smaller than the one of the argmin one.
-Among implementations of argmin aproaches, we have retained 
+Among implementations of argmin approaches, we have retained 
 the COBYLA one since it does not require any gradient to be executed.
 
 \begin{table*}
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ the COBYLA one since it does not require any gradient to be executed.
 $$
 \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
 \hline
-\textrm{Convergence Treshold} &
+\textrm{Convergence Threshold} &
 10^{-5} &
 1.67.10^{-5} &
 2.78.10^{-5} &
