From: laiymani Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:44:26 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Merge branch 'master' of ssh://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/hpcc2014 X-Git-Tag: hpcc2014_submission~34 X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/hpcc2014.git/commitdiff_plain/0e6d063a9e15647ffb71be54897a88cbe7c9a5b4?hp=2cc5590f929bcdb64636969b81f6529f2be6a09e Merge branch 'master' of ssh://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/hpcc2014 --- diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex index a074868..c79ed41 100644 --- a/hpcc.tex +++ b/hpcc.tex @@ -705,17 +705,18 @@ of the cluster and network specifications permitting to save time in executing the algorithm in asynchronous mode. \end{enumerate} Our results have shown that in certain conditions, asynchronous mode is -speeder up to \np[\%]{40} than executing the algorithm in synchronous mode +speeder up to \np[\%]{40} comparing to the synchronous GMRES method which is not negligible for solving complex practical problems with more and more increasing size. - Several studies have already addressed the performance execution time of +Several studies have already addressed the performance execution time of this class of algorithm. The work presented in this paper has demonstrated an original solution to optimize the use of a simulation tool to run efficiently an iterative parallel algorithm in asynchronous mode in a grid architecture. -\LZK{Perspectives???} +For our futur works, we plan to extend our experimentations to larger scale platforms by increasing the number of computing cores and the number of clusters. +We will also have to increase the size of the input problem which will require the use of a more powerful simulation platform. At last, we expect to compare our simulation results to real execution results on real architectures in order to experimentally validate our study. \section*{Acknowledgment}