From: David Laiymani <david.laiymani@univ-fcomte.fr>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:52:40 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Merge branch 'master' of ssh://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/hpcc2014
X-Git-Tag: hpcc2014_submission~9
X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/hpcc2014.git/commitdiff_plain/a9e6b06ca795cf328cc5b1540304596fc87d2f8e?hp=757a3d8174e2736033052c4acc64de277cd66e11

Merge branch 'master' of ssh://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/hpcc2014
---

diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex
index da2ec91..84ba5ca 100644
--- a/hpcc.tex
+++ b/hpcc.tex
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ $\text{62}^\text{3} = \text{\np{238328}}$ to $\text{150}^\text{3} =
   \end{mytable}
 \end{table}
   
-\RC{Du coup la latence est toujours la même, pourquoi la mettre dans la table?}
+%\RC{Du coup la latence est toujours la même, pourquoi la mettre dans la table?}
 
 %Then we have changed the network configuration using three clusters containing
 %respectively 33, 33 and 34 hosts, or again by on hundred hosts for all the
@@ -678,8 +678,8 @@ elements.
 %(synchronous and asynchronous) is achieved with an inter cluster of
 %\np[Mbit/s]{10} and a latency of \np[ms]{E-1}. To challenge an efficiency greater than 1.2 with a matrix %size of 100 points, it was necessary to degrade the
 %inter cluster network bandwidth from 5 to \np[Mbit/s]{2}.
-\AG{Conclusion, on prend une plateforme pourrie pour avoir un bon ratio sync/async ???
-  Quelle est la perte de perfs en faisant ça ?}
+%\AG{Conclusion, on prend une plateforme pourrie pour avoir un bon ratio sync/async ???
+  %Quelle est la perte de perfs en faisant ça ?}
 
 %A last attempt was made for a configuration of three clusters but more powerful
 %with 200 nodes in total. The convergence with a relative gain around 1.1 was