From: Arnaud Giersch Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:29:12 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Spell check. X-Git-Tag: hpcc2014_submission~95 X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/hpcc2014.git/commitdiff_plain/f48a4fd281389080afac9835c6e0157d147a0bba Spell check. --- diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex index 7d934e2..5226bc3 100644 --- a/hpcc.tex +++ b/hpcc.tex @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ \maketitle -\RC{Ordre des autheurs pas définitif.} +\RC{Ordre des auteurs pas définitif.} \begin{abstract} In recent years, the scalability of large-scale implementation in a distributed environment of algorithms becoming more and more complex has @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Parallel numerical applications (synchronous or asynchronous) may have different requirements. Quantifying their resource allocation policies and application scheduling algorithms in grid computing environments under varying load, CPU power and network speeds is very costly, very labor intensive and very time consuming \cite{Calheiros:2011:CTM:1951445.1951450}. The case of AIAC algorithms is even more problematic since they are very sensible to the -execution environment context. For instance, variations in the network bandwith (intra and inter- clusters), in the +execution environment context. For instance, variations in the network bandwidth (intra and inter-clusters), in the number and the power of nodes, in the number of clusters... can lead to very different number of iterations and so to very different execution times. Then, it appears that the use of simulation tools to explore various platform scenarios and to run large numbers of experiments quickly can be very promising. In this way, the use of a simulation @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ paper is twofold. First we give a first approach of the simulation of AIAC algor SimGrid toolkit \cite{SimGrid}). Second, we confirm the effectiveness of asynchronous mode algorithms by comparing their performance with the synchronous mode. More precisely, we had implemented a program for solving large non-symmetric linear system of equations by numerical method GMRES (Generalized Minimal Residual) []. We show, that with minor -modifications of the initial MPI code, the SimGrid toolkit allows us to perform a test campain of a real AIAC +modifications of the initial MPI code, the SimGrid toolkit allows us to perform a test campaign of a real AIAC application on different computing architectures. The simulated results we obtained are in line with real results exposed in ??. SimGrid had allowed us to launch the application from a modest computing infrastructure by simulating different distributed architectures composed by clusters nodes interconnected by variable speed networks. It has been @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ performance, but also a time saving of up to \np[\%]{40} in asynchronous mode. This article is structured as follows: after this introduction, the next section will give a brief description of iterative asynchronous model. Then, the simulation framework SimGrid is presented with the settings to create various -distributed architectures. The algorithm of the multi-splitting method used by GMRES written with MPI primitives and +distributed architectures. The algorithm of the multisplitting method used by GMRES written with MPI primitives and its adaptation to SimGrid with SMPI (Simulated MPI) is detailed in the next section. At last, the experiments results carried out will be presented before some concluding remarks and future works. @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ computing context, where the number of computational nodes is large, heterogeneo times generated by synchronizations are very penalizing. One way to overcome this problem is to use the \textit{Asynchronous Iterations - Asynchronous Communications (AIAC)} model. Here, local computations do not need to wait for required data. Processors can then perform their iterations with the data present at that time. Figure -\ref{fig:aiac} illustrates this model where the grey blocks represent the computation phases, the white spaces the idle +\ref{fig:aiac} illustrates this model where the gray blocks represent the computation phases, the white spaces the idle times and the arrows the communications. With this algorithmic model, the number of iterations required before the convergence is generally greater than for the two former classes. But, and as detailed in \cite{bcvc06:ij}, AIAC algorithms can significantly reduce overall execution times by suppressing idle times due to synchronizations especially @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ simulation tools to explore various platform scenarios at will and to run enormo very promising. Several works... In the context of AIAC algorithms, the use of simulation tools is even more relevant. Indeed, this class of applications -is very sensible to the execution environment context. For instance, variations in the network bandwith (intra and +is very sensible to the execution environment context. For instance, variations in the network bandwidth (intra and inter-clusters), in the number and the power of nodes, in the number of clusters... can lead to very different number of iterations and so to very different execution times. @@ -203,10 +203,10 @@ iterations and so to very different execution times. \section{SimGrid} SimGrid~\cite{casanova+legrand+quinson.2008.simgrid,SimGrid} is a simulation -framework to sudy the behavior of large-scale distributed systems. As its name +framework to study the behavior of large-scale distributed systems. As its name says, it emanates from the grid computing community, but is nowadays used to study grids, clouds, HPC or peer-to-peer systems. The early versions of SimGrid -date from 1999, but it's still actively developped and distributed as an open +date from 1999, but it's still actively developed and distributed as an open source software. Today, it's one of the major generic tools in the field of simulation for large-scale distributed systems. @@ -323,13 +323,13 @@ where $\MI$ is the maximum number of outer iterations and $\epsilon$ is the tole We did not encounter major blocking problems when adapting the multisplitting algorithm previously described to a simulation environment like SIMGRID unless some code debugging. Indeed, apart from the review of the program sequence for asynchronous exchanges between the six neighbors of each point in a submatrix within a cluster or between clusters, the algorithm was executed successfully with SMPI and provided identical outputs as those obtained with direct execution under MPI. In synchronous -mode, the execution of the program raised no particular issue but in asynchronous mode, the review of the sequence of MPI\_Isend, MPI\_Irecv and MPI\_waitall instructions -and with the addition of the primitive MPI\_Test was needed to avoid a memory fault due to an infinite loop resulting from the non- convergence of the algorithm. Note here that the use of SMPI +mode, the execution of the program raised no particular issue but in asynchronous mode, the review of the sequence of MPI\_Isend, MPI\_Irecv and MPI\_Waitall instructions +and with the addition of the primitive MPI\_Test was needed to avoid a memory fault due to an infinite loop resulting from the non-convergence of the algorithm. Note here that the use of SMPI functions optimizer for memory footprint and CPU usage is not recommended knowing that one wants to get real results by simulation. As mentioned, upon this adaptation, the algorithm is executed as in the real life in the simulated environment after the following minor changes. First, all declared global variables have been moved to local variables for each subroutine. In fact, global variables generate side effects arising from the concurrent access of -shared memory used by threads simulating each computing units in the Simgrid architecture. Second, the alignment of certain types of variables such as "long int" had -also to be reviewed. Finally, some compilation errors on MPI\_waitall and MPI\_Finalise primitives have been fixed with the latest version of Simgrid. +shared memory used by threads simulating each computing units in the SimGrid architecture. Second, the alignment of certain types of variables such as "long int" had +also to be reviewed. Finally, some compilation errors on MPI\_Waitall and MPI\_Finalize primitives have been fixed with the latest version of SimGrid. In total, the initial MPI program running on the simulation environment SMPI gave after a very simple adaptation the same results as those obtained in a real environment. We have tested in synchronous mode with a simulated platform starting from a modest 2 or 3 clusters grid to a larger configuration like simulating Grid5000 with more than 1500 hosts with 5000 cores~\cite{bolze2006grid}. Once the code debugging and adaptation were complete, the next section shows our methodology and experimental @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ the results have given a speedup less than 1, showing the effectiveness of the asynchronous performance compared to the synchronous mode. In the case of a two clusters configuration, Table~\ref{tab.cluster.2x50} shows -that with a deterioration of inter cluster network set with \np[Mbits/s]{5} of +that with a deterioration of inter cluster network set with \np[Mbit/s]{5} of bandwidth, a latency in order of a hundredth of a millisecond and a system power of one GFlops, an efficiency of about \np[\%]{40} in asynchronous mode is obtained for a matrix size of 62 elements. It is noticed that the result remains @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ increasing the problem size up to $100$ elements, it was necessary to increase t CPU power of \np[\%]{50} to \np[GFlops]{1.5} for a convergence of the algorithm with the same order of asynchronous mode efficiency. Maintaining such a system power but this time, increasing network throughput inter cluster up to -\np[Mbits/s]{50}, the result of efficiency of about \np[\%]{40} is obtained with +\np[Mbit/s]{50}, the result of efficiency of about \np[\%]{40} is obtained with high external precision of \np{E-11} for a matrix size from $110$ to $150$ side elements. @@ -538,13 +538,13 @@ Table~\ref{tab.cluster.3x33} shows that it was difficult to have a combination which gives an efficiency of asynchronous below \np[\%]{80}. Indeed, for a matrix size of $62$ elements, equality between the performance of the two modes (synchronous and asynchronous) is achieved with an inter cluster of -\np[Mbits/s]{10} and a latency of \np[ms]{E-1}. To challenge an efficiency by +\np[Mbit/s]{10} and a latency of \np[ms]{E-1}. To challenge an efficiency by \np[\%]{78} with a matrix size of $100$ points, it was necessary to degrade the inter cluster network bandwidth from 5 to 2 Mbit/s. A last attempt was made for a configuration of three clusters but more powerful with 200 nodes in total. The convergence with a speedup of \np[\%]{90} was -obtained with a bandwidth of \np[Mbits/s]{1} as shown in +obtained with a bandwidth of \np[Mbit/s]{1} as shown in Table~\ref{tab.cluster.3x67}. \section{Conclusion} @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ reach the following three objectives: \item To have a flexible configurable execution platform resolving the hard exercise to access to very limited but so solicited physical resources; -\item to ensure the algorithm convergence with a raisonnable time and +\item to ensure the algorithm convergence with a reasonable time and iteration number ; \item and finally and more importantly, to find the correct combination of the cluster and network specifications permitting to save time in @@ -596,3 +596,10 @@ This work is partially funded by the Labex ACTION program (contract ANR-11-LABX- %%% fill-column: 80 %%% ispell-local-dictionary: "american" %%% End: + +% LocalWords: Ramamonjisoa Laiymani Arnaud Giersch Ziane Khodja Raphaël Femto +% LocalWords: Université Franche Comté IUT Montbéliard Maréchal Juin Inria Sud +% LocalWords: Ouest Vieille Talence cedex scalability experimentations HPC MPI +% LocalWords: Parallelization AIAC GMRES multi SMPI SISC SIAC SimDAG DAGs Lua +% LocalWords: Fortran GFlops priori Mbit de du fcomte multisplitting scalable +% LocalWords: SimGrid Belfort parallelize Labex ANR LABX IEEEabrv hpccBib