From 28e01316fd4048f6765d2771d36cd4565cba5421 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Laiymani Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:40:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] corrections --- hpcc.tex | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex index 4a056f4..04c5403 100644 --- a/hpcc.tex +++ b/hpcc.tex @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ $\text{62}^\text{3} = \text{\np{238328}}$ to $\text{150}^\text{3} = \end{mytable} \end{table} -\RC{Du coup la latence est toujours la même, pourquoi la mettre dans la table?} +%\RC{Du coup la latence est toujours la même, pourquoi la mettre dans la table?} %Then we have changed the network configuration using three clusters containing %respectively 33, 33 and 34 hosts, or again by on hundred hosts for all the @@ -679,8 +679,8 @@ elements. %(synchronous and asynchronous) is achieved with an inter cluster of %\np[Mbit/s]{10} and a latency of \np[ms]{E-1}. To challenge an efficiency greater than 1.2 with a matrix %size of 100 points, it was necessary to degrade the %inter cluster network bandwidth from 5 to \np[Mbit/s]{2}. -\AG{Conclusion, on prend une plateforme pourrie pour avoir un bon ratio sync/async ??? - Quelle est la perte de perfs en faisant ça ?} +%\AG{Conclusion, on prend une plateforme pourrie pour avoir un bon ratio sync/async ??? + %Quelle est la perte de perfs en faisant ça ?} %A last attempt was made for a configuration of three clusters but more powerful %with 200 nodes in total. The convergence with a relative gain around 1.1 was -- 2.39.5