From 79daec76a811fc9c448ca8880c7eae6889ffaa60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: laiymani Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:28:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] corrections --- hpcc.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex index 34c35a7..31a6964 100644 --- a/hpcc.tex +++ b/hpcc.tex @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ the results have given a relative gain more than 2.5, showing the effectiveness asynchronous performance compared to the synchronous mode. With these settings, Table~\ref{tab.cluster.2x50} shows -that after a deterioration of inter cluster network with a bandwidth of \np[Mbit/s]{5} and a latency in order of one hundredth of millisecond and a processor power +that after setting the bandwidth of the inter cluster network to \np[Mbit/s]{5} and a latency in order of one hundredth of millisecond and a processor power of one GFlops, an efficiency of about \np[\%]{40} is obtained in asynchronous mode for a matrix size of 62 elements. It is noticed that the result remains stable even we vary the residual error precision from \np{E-5} to \np{E-9}. By -- 2.39.5