From abc7ee50fcd018c2c756f80d084b182a712b245e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: laiymani Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:44:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] corrections --- hpcc.tex | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex index aeafb67..622a2f0 100644 --- a/hpcc.tex +++ b/hpcc.tex @@ -707,17 +707,18 @@ of the cluster and network specifications permitting to save time in executing the algorithm in asynchronous mode. \end{enumerate} Our results have shown that in certain conditions, asynchronous mode is -speeder up to \np[\%]{40} than executing the algorithm in synchronous mode +speeder up to \np[\%]{40} comparing to the synchronous GMRES method which is not negligible for solving complex practical problems with more and more increasing size. - Several studies have already addressed the performance execution time of +Several studies have already addressed the performance execution time of this class of algorithm. The work presented in this paper has demonstrated an original solution to optimize the use of a simulation tool to run efficiently an iterative parallel algorithm in asynchronous mode in a grid architecture. -\LZK{Perspectives???} +For our futur works, we plan to extend our experimentations to larger scale platforms by increasing the number of computing cores and the number of clusters. +We will also have to increase the size of the input problem which will require the use of a more powerful simulation platform. At last, we expect to compare our simulation results to real execution results on real architectures in order to experimentally validate our study. \section*{Acknowledgment} -- 2.39.5