From fe2acffc0f8d127cdeb32859d2666897c00f0058 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lilia <lilia@amazigh.bordeaux.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:54:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] v12

---
 hpcc.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex
index dc76042..2523d89 100644
--- a/hpcc.tex
+++ b/hpcc.tex
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ asynchronous multisplitting  compared to GMRES with two distant clusters.
 With these settings, Table~\ref{tab.cluster.2x50} shows
 that after setting the bandwidth of the  inter cluster network to  \np[Mbit/s]{5} and a latency in order of one hundredth of millisecond and a processor power
 of one GFlops, an efficiency of about \np[\%]{40} is
-obtained in asynchronous mode for a matrix size of 62 elements. It is noticed that the result remains
+obtained in asynchronous mode for a matrix size of $62^3$ elements. It is noticed that the result remains
 stable even we vary the residual error precision from \np{E-5} to \np{E-9}. By
 increasing the matrix size up to 100 elements, it was necessary to increase the
 CPU power of \np[\%]{50} to \np[GFlops]{1.5} to get the algorithm convergence and the same order of asynchronous mode efficiency.  Maintaining such processor power but increasing network throughput inter cluster up to
-- 
2.39.5