strategy. On the graphs from the figure~\ref{fig.results1}, these strategies
are respectively labeled ``b'' and ``a''.
-twice faster on lines
-almost equivalent on torus
-worse on hcubes
+We can see that the relative performance of these strategies is mainly
+influenced by the application topology. It's for the line topology that the
+difference is the more important. In this case, the \besteffort{} strategy is
+nearly twice as fast as the \makhoul{} strategy.
+
+On the contrary, for the hypercube topology, the \besteffort{} strategy performs
+worse than the \makhoul{} strategy.
+
+Finally, the results are more nuanced for the torus topology.
+
+This can be explained by ...
-> interconnection
qu'il y a beaucoup de voisins.
\subsubsection{The $k$ parameter}
+\label{results-k}
Dans le cas où les comms coutent cher et ou BE se fait avoir, on peut ameliorer
les perfs avec le param k.
% LocalWords: SimGrid DASUD Comté asynchronism ji ik isend irecv Cortés et al
% LocalWords: chan ctrl fifo Makhoul GFlop xml pre FEMTO Makhoul's fca bdee
% LocalWords: cdde Contassot Vivier underlaid du de Maréchal Juin cedex calcul
-% LocalWords: biblio
+% LocalWords: biblio Institut UMR Université UFC Centre Scientifique CNRS des
+% LocalWords: École Nationale Supérieure Mécanique Microtechniques ENSMM UTBM
+% LocalWords: Technologie Bahi
