X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/loba-papers.git/blobdiff_plain/77e9f12f5c910b23fb1692d8e1c33b6910fe6e9c..66aff7d1fa57fdba5f70f086fd0ca55052fa57e8:/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex

diff --git a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
index d03a1d5..93a9098 100644
--- a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
+++ b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
@@ -189,11 +189,14 @@ $3$.   If  it  sends  load  to  processor $1$  it  will  not  satisfy  condition
 $x_3^2(t)$.  So we consider that the \emph{ping-pong} condition is probably to
 strong. Currently, we did not try to make another convergence proof without this
 condition or with a weaker condition.
-%
-\FIXME{Develop: We have the feeling that such a weaker condition
-  exists, because (it's not a proof, but) we have never seen any
-  scenario that is not leading to convergence, even with LB-strategies
-  that are not fulfilling these two conditions.}
+
+Nevertheless, we conjecture that such a weaker condition exists.  In fact, we
+have never seen any scenario that is not leading to convergence, even with
+load-balancing strategies that are not exactly fulfilling these two conditions.
+
+It may be the subject of future work to express weaker conditions, and to prove
+that they are sufficient to ensure the convergence of the load-balancing
+algorithm.
 
 \section{Best effort strategy}
 \label{Best-effort}
@@ -630,6 +633,27 @@ With these constraints in mind, we defined the following metrics:
 \subsection{Validation of our approaches}
 \label{Results}
 
+\begin{figure}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-10:1-cluster-line}
+  \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-10:1-cluster-torus}%
+  \hfill%%
+  \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-10:1-cluster-hcube}
+  \caption{Results \textbf{[FIXME]}}
+  \label{fig.results}
+\end{figure}
+
+Dans cet ordre:
+...
+- comparer be/makhoul -> be tient la route
+        -> en réel uniquement
+- valider l'extension virtual load -> c'est 'achement bien
+- proposer le -k -> ça peut aider dans certains cas
+- conclure avec la version entière -> on n'a pas l'effet d'escalier !
+Q: comment inclure les types/tailles de platesformes ?
+Q: comment faire des moyennes ?
+Q: comment introduire les distrib 1/N ?
+...
 
 On constate quoi (vérifier avec les chiffres)?
 \begin{itemize}
@@ -647,11 +671,11 @@ On constate quoi (vérifier avec les chiffres)?
 
 \item volume de comm? souvent, besteffort/plain en fait plus. pourquoi?
 
+\item répartition initiale de la charge ?
+
 \item integer mode sur topo. line n'a jamais fini en plain? vérifier si ce n'est
   pas à cause de l'effet d'escalier que bk est capable de gommer.
 
-\item répartition initiale de la charge ?
-
 \end{itemize}
 
 \begin{itshape}
@@ -692,6 +716,7 @@ Taille : 10 100 très gros
   the Mésocentre de calcul de Franche-Comté.
 \end{acknowledgements}
 
+\FIXME{find and add more references}
 \bibliographystyle{spmpsci}
 \bibliography{biblio}