From: Arnaud Giersch Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:15:58 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Spell check. X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/loba-papers.git/commitdiff_plain/af32e62a6cd1228c1efbdad6d120bc81ea240282?ds=inline Spell check. --- diff --git a/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex b/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex index d731afe..5570b35 100644 --- a/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex +++ b/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex @@ -732,12 +732,12 @@ Before looking at the different variations, we'll first show that the plain strategy. On the graphs from the figure~\ref{fig.results1}, these strategies are respectively labeled ``b'' and ``a''. -We can see that the relative performance of these startegies is mainly +We can see that the relative performance of these strategies is mainly influenced by the application topology. It's for the line topology that the difference is the more important. In this case, the \besteffort{} strategy is nearly twice as fast as the \makhoul{} strategy. -On the contrary, for the hypercube topoly, the \besteffort{} strategy performs +On the contrary, for the hypercube topology, the \besteffort{} strategy performs worse than the \makhoul{} strategy. Finally, the results are more nuanced for the torus topology. @@ -854,4 +854,6 @@ Mésocentre de calcul de Franche-Comté. % LocalWords: SimGrid DASUD Comté asynchronism ji ik isend irecv Cortés et al % LocalWords: chan ctrl fifo Makhoul GFlop xml pre FEMTO Makhoul's fca bdee % LocalWords: cdde Contassot Vivier underlaid du de Maréchal Juin cedex calcul -% LocalWords: biblio +% LocalWords: biblio Institut UMR Université UFC Centre Scientifique CNRS des +% LocalWords: École Nationale Supérieure Mécanique Microtechniques ENSMM UTBM +% LocalWords: Technologie Bahi