From: Arnaud Giersch <arnaud.giersch@iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:15:58 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Spell check.
X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/loba-papers.git/commitdiff_plain/af32e62a6cd1228c1efbdad6d120bc81ea240282?ds=sidebyside;hp=f66f867710d2e58ab32016531b05ae0d9adbfc58

Spell check.
---

diff --git a/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex b/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex
index d731afe..5570b35 100644
--- a/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex
+++ b/loba-besteffort/loba-besteffort.tex
@@ -732,12 +732,12 @@ Before looking at the different variations, we'll first show that the plain
 strategy.  On the graphs from the figure~\ref{fig.results1}, these strategies
 are respectively labeled ``b'' and ``a''.
 
-We can see that the relative performance of these startegies is mainly
+We can see that the relative performance of these strategies is mainly
 influenced by the application topology.  It's for the line topology that the
 difference is the more important.  In this case, the \besteffort{} strategy is
 nearly twice as fast as the \makhoul{} strategy.
 
-On the contrary, for the hypercube topoly, the \besteffort{} strategy performs
+On the contrary, for the hypercube topology, the \besteffort{} strategy performs
 worse than the \makhoul{} strategy.
 
 Finally, the results are more nuanced for the torus topology.
@@ -854,4 +854,6 @@ Mésocentre de calcul de Franche-Comté.
 % LocalWords:  SimGrid DASUD Comté asynchronism ji ik isend irecv Cortés et al
 % LocalWords:  chan ctrl fifo Makhoul GFlop xml pre FEMTO Makhoul's fca bdee
 % LocalWords:  cdde Contassot Vivier underlaid du de Maréchal Juin cedex calcul
-% LocalWords:  biblio
+% LocalWords:  biblio Institut UMR Université UFC Centre Scientifique CNRS des
+% LocalWords:  École Nationale Supérieure Mécanique Microtechniques ENSMM UTBM
+% LocalWords:  Technologie Bahi