From: Arnaud Giersch Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:35:52 +0000 (+0100) Subject: typos X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/loba-papers.git/commitdiff_plain/c8b7a837b49a20dcbce655c5c891aea3f25542f5 typos --- diff --git a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex index 3010b1b..49477d7 100644 --- a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex +++ b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ This gives us as many as $4\times 2\times 2 = 16$ different strategies. \paragraph{Configurations} -In order to show the behaviour of the different strategies in different +In order to show the behavior of the different strategies in different settings, we simulated the executions on two sorts of platforms. These two sorts of platforms differ by their underlaid network topology. On the one hand, we have homogeneous platforms, modeled as a cluster. On the other hand, we have @@ -514,10 +514,10 @@ nodes: 16, 64, 256, and 1024 nodes. The distributed processes of the application were then logically organized along three possible topologies: a line, a torus or an hypercube. We ran tests where the total load was initially on an only node (at one end for the line topology), -and other tests where the load was initially randomly distributed accross all +and other tests where the load was initially randomly distributed across all the participating nodes. -For each of the preceding configuration, we finally had to cohose the +For each of the preceding configuration, we finally had to choose the computation and communication costs of a load unit. We chose them, such as to have three different computation over communication cost ratios, and hence model three different kinds of applications: @@ -611,4 +611,4 @@ Taille : 10 100 très gros % LocalWords: Raphaël Couturier Arnaud Giersch Abderrahmane Sider Franche ij % LocalWords: Bertsekas Tsitsiklis SimGrid DASUD Comté Béjaïa asynchronism ji -% LocalWords: ik isend irecv Cortés et al chan ctrl fifo +% LocalWords: ik isend irecv Cortés et al chan ctrl fifo Makhoul