From: Arnaud Giersch <arnaud.giersch@iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:57:50 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Rewrite macro \FIXME, and add some.
X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/loba-papers.git/commitdiff_plain/ef8e964e272b79d5c483246e93906d7c55c3027d?ds=sidebyside

Rewrite macro \FIXME, and add some.
---

diff --git a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
index 8770bab..5db76a9 100644
--- a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
+++ b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
   \end{tabular}}
 
 \newcommand{\FIXME}[1]{%
-  \textbf{[FIXME]}\marginpar{\flushleft\footnotesize\bfseries$\triangleright$ #1}}
+  \textbf{$\triangleright$\marginpar{\textbf{[FIXME]}}~#1}}
 
 \newcommand{\VAR}[1]{\textit{#1}}
 
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ execution  times. In Section~\ref{Virtual  load}, the  virtual load  mechanism i
 proposed. Simulations allowed to show that both our approaches are valid using a
 quite realistic  model detailed in  Section~\ref{Simulations}. Finally we  give a
 conclusion and some perspectives to this work.
-
+\FIXME{What about Section~\ref{Other}?}
 
 
 
@@ -185,7 +185,11 @@ $3$.   If  it  sends  load  to  processor $1$  it  will  not  satisfy  condition
 $x_3^2(t)$.  So we consider that the \emph{ping-pong} condition is probably to
 strong. Currently, we did not try to make another convergence proof without this
 condition or with a weaker condition.
-
+%
+\FIXME{Develop: We have the feeling that such a weaker condition
+  exists, because (it's not a proof, but) we have never seen any
+  scenario that is not leading to convergence, even with LB-strategies
+  that are not fulfilling these two conditions.}
 
 \section{Best effort strategy}
 \label{Best-effort}