X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/mpi-energy.git/blobdiff_plain/bdb61bc896534ac147bcabe2c6347ae33eb97912..6dbf3f1a90a554d6a451664d2c6a5cbca41c6e9d:/paper.tex

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 5ba8cc7..c8577cb 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -176,8 +176,8 @@ we consider execution of the synchronous tasks on distributed homogeneous
 platform. These tasks can exchange the data via synchronous message passing.
 \begin{figure*}[t]
   \centering
-  \subfloat[Sync. imbalanced communications]{\includegraphics[scale=0.67]{commtasks}\label{fig:h1}}
-  \subfloat[Sync. imbalanced computations]{\includegraphics[scale=0.67]{compt}\label{fig:h2}}
+  \subfloat[Sync. imbalanced communications]{\includegraphics[scale=0.67]{fig/commtasks}\label{fig:h1}}
+  \subfloat[Sync. imbalanced computations]{\includegraphics[scale=0.67]{fig/compt}\label{fig:h2}}
   \caption{Parallel tasks on homogeneous platform}
   \label{fig:homo}
 \end{figure*}
@@ -342,10 +342,10 @@ performance as follows:
 \begin{figure*}
   \centering
   \subfloat[Converted relation.]{%
-    \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{file.eps}\label{fig:r1}}%
+    \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/file}\label{fig:r1}}%
   \qquad%
   \subfloat[Real relation.]{%
-    \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{file3.eps}\label{fig:r2}}
+    \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/file3}\label{fig:r2}}
   \label{fig:rel}
   \caption{The energy and performance relation}
 \end{figure*}
@@ -468,10 +468,10 @@ time values. These scaling factors are computed by dividing the maximum
 frequency by the new one see EQ~(\ref{eq:s}). 
 \begin{figure*}[t]
   \centering
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{cg_per.eps}\hfill%
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{mg_pre.eps}\hfill%
- % \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{bt_pre.eps}\qquad%
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{lu_pre.eps}\hfill%
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/cg_per}\hfill%
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/mg_pre}\hfill%
+ % \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/bt_pre}\qquad%
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/lu_pre}\hfill%
   \caption{Comparing predicted to real execution time}
   \label{fig:pred}
 \end{figure*}
@@ -509,12 +509,12 @@ energy saving percent and the minimum performance degradation percent at the
 same time from all available scaling factors.
 \begin{figure*}[t]
   \centering
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{ep.eps}\hfill%
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{cg.eps}\hfill%
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{sp.eps}
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{lu.eps}\hfill%
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{bt.eps}\hfill%
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{ft.eps}
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/ep}\hfill%
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/cg}\hfill%
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/sp}
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/lu}\hfill%
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/bt}\hfill%
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/ft}
   \caption{Optimal scaling factors for the predicted energy and performance of NAS benchmarks}
   \label{fig:nas}
 \end{figure*}
@@ -693,9 +693,9 @@ gives the highest positive energy to performance trade-offs while Rauber and Rü
 EP.
 \begin{figure*}[t]
   \centering
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{compare_class_A.pdf}
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{compare_class_B.pdf}
-  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{compare_class_c.pdf}
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/compare_class_A}
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/compare_class_B}
+  \includegraphics[width=.328\textwidth]{fig/compare_class_C}
   \caption{Comparing our method to Rauber and Rünger methods}
   \label{fig:compare}
 \end{figure*}