X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/mpi-energy.git/blobdiff_plain/cfa074b9eb12b37a1a4aa2c3d4c5ca44f9cc74fb..19523ee5dd2ff4cacca09afc323219b043df3752:/paper.tex?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 00d85a2..3e0f96d 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -562,8 +562,8 @@ optimal level without considering the performance as in EQ~(\ref{eq:sopt}). We
 refer to this scenario as $R_{E}$. The second scenario is similar to the first
 except setting the slower task to the maximum frequency (when the scale $S=1$)
 to keep the performance from degradation as mush as possible. We refer to this
-scenario as $R_{E-P}$. The comparison is made in tables~(\ref{table:compare
-  Class A},\ref{table:compare Class B},\ref{table:compare Class C}). These
+scenario as $R_{E-P}$. The comparison is made in tables~(\ref{table:compareA},
+\ref{table:compareB}, and \ref{table:compareC}). These
 tables show the results of our method and Rauber and RÃ¼nger scenarios for all the
 NAS benchmarks programs for classes A,B and C.
 \begin{table}[p]
