thanks to mesocentre

[mpi-energy2.git] / mpi-energy2-extension / review / review.tex

diff --git a/mpi-energy2-extension/review/review.tex b/mpi-energy2-extension/review/review.tex
index d49b795f29adb0d1a622eccb64d979e859880027..a7253f6a3a83755128b9c2d12761182c3514dc0b 100644 (file)
--- a/mpi-energy2-extension/review/review.tex
+++ b/mpi-energy2-extension/review/review.tex
@@ -187,7 +187,9 @@ For the variability issue, please refer to the answer to question 1.
 \section{Questions and remarks of the second reviewer} 
 
 \begin{enumerate}
 \section{Questions and remarks of the second reviewer} 
 
 \begin{enumerate}

-\item Move the contributions from related work to introduction
+\item Move the contributions from related work to introduction.
+
+\textbf{Answer:} The contributions were moved to the introduction section.

 
 \item Why emphasize it is a grid platform? the presentation of related work follows the logic of heterogeneous CPUs. Grid is only a type of platform with heterogeneous CPUs.
 
 
 \item Why emphasize it is a grid platform? the presentation of related work follows the logic of heterogeneous CPUs. Grid is only a type of platform with heterogeneous CPUs.
 


@@ -273,13 +275,16 @@ by the scheduler of the operating system of the node.
 
 \item Why $T_{old}$ is computed using eq. 12, which applies MAX over computation time and communication time, while in  $T_{new}$, max and min operations are applied over computation and communication separately?
 
 
 \item Why $T_{old}$ is computed using eq. 12, which applies MAX over computation time and communication time, while in  $T_{new}$, max and min operations are applied over computation and communication separately?
 

-\textcolor{blue}{Answer:  We  agree with the reviewer, $T_{old}$ is the maximum execution time of the application before scaling the frequency and it is computed as in $T_{new}$ equation without scaling factors. So, we have changed the $T_{old}$ in the paper as as follows:
+\textbf{Answer:} Both forms can be used for computing $T_{old}$ and $T_{new}$. To avoid this confusion, the same form was used for both equations in the paper.
+

 \begin{equation}
   \label{eq:told}
    T_{old} = \mathop{\max_{i=1,2,\dots,N}}_{j=1,2,\dots,M_i} (\Tcp[ij]) + 
 \begin{equation}
   \label{eq:told}
    T_{old} = \mathop{\max_{i=1,2,\dots,N}}_{j=1,2,\dots,M_i} (\Tcp[ij]) + 

-   \mathop{\min_{i=1,2,\dots,N}} (\Tcm[hj] )           
+   \mathop{\min_{j=1,2,\dots,M_h}} (\Tcm[hj] )           

 \end{equation}
 \end{equation}

-}
+where $h$ is the index of the slowest cluster. 
+
+   

 
 \item Line 55 on page 16 is to define the slack time, which should be introduced at the beginning of the paper, such as in figure 1.
 
 
 \item Line 55 on page 16 is to define the slack time, which should be introduced at the beginning of the paper, such as in figure 1.