@@ -187,7+187,9 @@ For the variability issue, please refer to the answer to question 1.
\section{Questions and remarks of the second reviewer}
\begin{enumerate}
\section{Questions and remarks of the second reviewer}
\begin{enumerate}
-\item Move the contributions from related work to introduction
+\item Move the contributions from related work to introduction.
+
+\textbf{Answer:} The contributions were moved to the introduction section.
\item Why emphasize it is a grid platform? the presentation of related work follows the logic of heterogeneous CPUs. Grid is only a type of platform with heterogeneous CPUs.
\item Why emphasize it is a grid platform? the presentation of related work follows the logic of heterogeneous CPUs. Grid is only a type of platform with heterogeneous CPUs.
@@ -273,13+275,16 @@ by the scheduler of the operating system of the node.
\item Why $T_{old}$ is computed using eq. 12, which applies MAX over computation time and communication time, while in $T_{new}$, max and min operations are applied over computation and communication separately?
\item Why $T_{old}$ is computed using eq. 12, which applies MAX over computation time and communication time, while in $T_{new}$, max and min operations are applied over computation and communication separately?
-\textcolor{blue}{Answer: We agree with the reviewer, $T_{old}$ is the maximum execution time of the application before scaling the frequency and it is computed as in $T_{new}$ equation without scaling factors. So, we have changed the $T_{old}$ in the paper as as follows:
+\textbf{Answer:} Both forms can be used for computing $T_{old}$ and $T_{new}$. To avoid this confusion, the same form was used for both equations in the paper.