X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/mpi-energy2.git/blobdiff_plain/71a2ec18276dbbb8ee0dc07e9a390d558eda81d7..a79756ce23315cc6ab9203a3adc8cf6919e746f0:/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex diff --git a/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex b/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex index b6839ce..ea21ce7 100644 --- a/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex +++ b/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex @@ -859,20 +859,20 @@ The benchmarks have seven different classes, S, W, A, B, C, D and E, that repres Name & model & Freq. & Freq. & Freq. & per CPU & of one core \\ & & GHz & GHz & GHz & & \\ \hline - Taurus & Intel & 2.3 & 1.2 & 0.1 & 6 & \np[W]{35} \\ - & Xeon & & & & & \\ + & Intel & 2.3 & 1.2 & 0.1 & 6 & \np[W]{35} \\ + Taurus & Xeon & & & & & \\ & E5-2630 & & & & & \\ \hline - Graphene & Intel & 2.53 & 1.2 & 0.133 & 4 & \np[W]{23} \\ - & Xeon & & & & & \\ + & Intel & 2.53 & 1.2 & 0.133 & 4 & \np[W]{23} \\ + Graphene & Xeon & & & & & \\ & X3440 & & & & & \\ \hline - Griffon & Intel & 2.5 & 2 & 0.5 & 4 & \np[W]{46} \\ - & Xeon & & & & & \\ + & Intel & 2.5 & 2 & 0.5 & 4 & \np[W]{46} \\ + Griffon & Xeon & & & & & \\ & L5420 & & & & & \\ \hline - Graphite & Intel & 2 & 1.2 & 0.1 & 8 & \np[W]{35} \\ - & Xeon & & & & & \\ + & Intel & 2 & 1.2 & 0.1 & 8 & \np[W]{35} \\ + Graphite & Xeon & & & & & \\ & E5-2650 & & & & & \\ \hline \end{tabular} @@ -978,9 +978,9 @@ energy saving percentage in one site scenario when executed over 16 nodes compar \centering \subfloat[The energy consumption by the nodes wile executing the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios ]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/eng_con_scenarios.eps}\label{fig:eng_sen}} \hspace{1cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/eng_con_scenarios.eps}\label{fig:eng_sen}} \hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The execution times of the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/time_scenarios.eps}\label{fig:time_sen}} + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/time_scenarios.eps}\label{fig:time_sen}} \label{fig:exp-time-energy} \caption{The energy consumption and execution time of NAS Benchmarks over different scenarios} \end{figure} @@ -1004,12 +1004,12 @@ The best energy saving percentage was obtained in the one site scenario with 16 \begin{figure} \centering \subfloat[The energy reduction while executing the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios ]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/eng_s.eps}\label{fig:eng_s}} \hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/eng_s.eps}\label{fig:eng_s}} \hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The performance degradation of the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/per_d.eps}\label{fig:per_d}}\hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/per_d.eps}\label{fig:per_d}}\hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The tradeoff distance between the energy reduction and the performance of the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/dist.eps}\label{fig:dist}} + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/dist.eps}\label{fig:dist}} \label{fig:exp-res} \caption{The experimental results of different scenarios} \end{figure} @@ -1075,9 +1075,9 @@ Scenario name & Cluster name & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}c@ \begin{figure} \centering \subfloat[Comparing the execution times of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multicores scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/time.eps}\label{fig:time-mc}} \hspace{1cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/time.eps}\label{fig:time-mc}} \hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[Comparing the energy consumptions of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multi-cores scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/eng_con.eps}\label{fig:eng-cons-mc}} + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/eng_con.eps}\label{fig:eng-cons-mc}} \label{fig:eng-cons} \caption{The energy consumptions and execution times of NAS benchmarks over one core and multi-cores per node architectures} \end{figure} @@ -1115,12 +1115,12 @@ in the figure \ref{fig:dist-mc}. These tradeoff distance between energy consump \begin{figure} \centering \subfloat[The energy saving of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multicores scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/eng_s_mc.eps}\label{fig:eng-s-mc}} \hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/eng_s_mc.eps}\label{fig:eng-s-mc}} \hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The performance degradation of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multicores scenarios ]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/per_d_mc.eps}\label{fig:per-d-mc}}\hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/per_d_mc.eps}\label{fig:per-d-mc}}\hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The tradeoff distance of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multicores scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/dist_mc.eps}\label{fig:dist-mc}} + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/dist_mc.eps}\label{fig:dist-mc}} \label{fig:exp-res} \caption{The experimental results of one core and multi-cores scenarios} \end{figure} @@ -1141,12 +1141,12 @@ In these experiments, the class D of the NAS parallel benchmarks are executed ov \begin{figure} \centering \subfloat[The energy saving percentages for the nodes executing the NAS benchmarks over the three power scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/eng_pow.eps}\label{fig:eng-pow}} \hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/eng_pow.eps}\label{fig:eng-pow}} \hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The performance degradation percentages for the NAS benchmarks over the three power scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/per_pow.eps}\label{fig:per-pow}}\hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/per_pow.eps}\label{fig:per-pow}}\hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The tradeoff distance between the energy reduction and the performance of the NAS benchmarks over the three power scenarios]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/dist_pow.eps}\label{fig:dist-pow}} + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/dist_pow.eps}\label{fig:dist-pow}} \label{fig:exp-pow} \caption{The experimental results of different static power scenarios} \end{figure} @@ -1206,11 +1206,11 @@ presented in the figures \ref{fig:edp-eng}, \ref{fig:edp-perf} and \ref{fig:edp- \begin{figure} \centering \subfloat[The energy reduction induced by the Maxdist method and the EDP method]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/edp_eng}\label{fig:edp-eng}} \hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/edp_eng}\label{fig:edp-eng}} \hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The performance degradation induced by the Maxdist method and the EDP method]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/edp_per}\label{fig:edp-perf}}\hspace{2cm}% + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/edp_per}\label{fig:edp-perf}}\hspace{0.4cm}% \subfloat[The tradeoff distance between the energy consumption reduction and the performance for the Maxdist method and the EDP method]{% - \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{fig/edp_dist}\label{fig:edp-dist}} + \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/edp_dist}\label{fig:edp-dist}} \label{fig:edp-comparison} \caption{The comparison results} \end{figure}