From: jean-claude <jean-claude.charr@univ-fcomte.fr>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:15:04 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Figure captions modified
X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/mpi-energy2.git/commitdiff_plain/3d5f3e882a122029ae42138304769d94b5f844e1?ds=sidebyside;hp=-c

Figure captions modified
---

3d5f3e882a122029ae42138304769d94b5f844e1
diff --git a/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex b/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex
index 1caecff..4d36639 100644
--- a/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex
+++ b/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ The benchmarks have seven different classes, S, W, A, B, C, D and E, that repres
 \begin{figure}[!t]
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{fig/power_consumption.pdf}
-  \caption{The power consumption by one core from Taurus cluster}
+  \caption{The power consumption by one core from the Taurus cluster}
   \label{fig:power_cons}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ Table \ref{tab:sc} shows the number of nodes used from each cluster for each sce
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/eng_con_scenarios.eps}
-  \caption{The energy consumptions of NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
+  \caption{The energy consumption by the nodes wile executing the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
   \label{fig:eng_sen}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ Table \ref{tab:sc} shows the number of nodes used from each cluster for each sce
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/time_scenarios.eps}
-  \caption{The execution times of NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
+  \caption{The execution times of the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
   \label{fig:time_sen}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ However, the  execution times and the energy consumptions of EP and MG benchmark
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/eng_s.eps}
-  \caption{The energy saving of NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
+  \caption{The energy reduction while executing the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
   \label{fig:eng_s}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ However, the  execution times and the energy consumptions of EP and MG benchmark
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/per_d.eps}
-  \caption{The performance degradation of NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
+  \caption{The performance degradation of the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
   \label{fig:per_d}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ However, the  execution times and the energy consumptions of EP and MG benchmark
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/dist.eps}
-  \caption{The tradeoff distance of NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
+  \caption{The tradeoff distance between the energy reduction and the performance of the NAS benchmarks over different scenarios }
   \label{fig:dist}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1147,14 +1147,14 @@ In these experiments, the class D of the NAS parallel benchmarks are executed ov
  \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/eng_pow.eps}
-  \caption{The energy saving percentages for NAS benchmarks of the three power scenario}
+  \caption{The energy saving percentages for the nodes executing the NAS benchmarks over the three power scenarios}
   \label{fig:eng-pow}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/per_pow.eps}
-  \caption{The performance degradation percentages for NAS benchmarks of the three power scenario}
+  \caption{The performance degradation percentages for the NAS benchmarks over the three power scenarios}
   \label{fig:per-pow}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1162,14 +1162,14 @@ In these experiments, the class D of the NAS parallel benchmarks are executed ov
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/dist_pow.eps}
-  \caption{The tradeoff distance for NAS benchmarks of the three power scenario}
+  \caption{The tradeoff distance between the energy reduction and the performance of the NAS benchmarks over the three power scenarios}
   \label{fig:dist-pow}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.47]{fig/three_scenarios.pdf}
-  \caption{Comparing the selected frequency scaling factors of MG benchmark for three static power scenarios}
+  \caption{Comparing the selected frequency scaling factors for the MG benchmark over the three static power scenarios}
   \label{fig:fre-pow}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1219,19 +1219,19 @@ presented in the figures \ref{fig:edp-eng}, \ref{fig:edp-perf} and \ref{fig:edp-
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/edp_eng}
-  \caption{Comparing of the energy saving for the proposed method with EDP method}
+  \caption{The energy reduction induced by  the Maxdist method and the EDP method}
   \label{fig:edp-eng}
 \end{figure}
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/edp_per}
-  \caption{Comparing of the performance degradation for the proposed method with EDP method}
+  \caption{The performance degradation induced by  the Maxdist method and the EDP method}
   \label{fig:edp-perf}
 \end{figure}
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig/edp_dist}
-  \caption{Comparing of the tradeoff distance for the proposed method with EDP method}
+  \caption{The tradeoff distance between the energy consumption reduction and the performance for the Maxdist method and the  EDP method}
   \label{fig:edp-dist}
 \end{figure}