From: jean-claude <jean-claude.charr@univ-fcomte.fr>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:44:46 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: Merge branch 'master' of ssh://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/mpi-energy2
X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/mpi-energy2.git/commitdiff_plain/5f3fce4924f798cbdf119e36bfa8228ad5f922e3?ds=sidebyside;hp=--cc

Merge branch 'master' of ssh://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/mpi-energy2

Conflicts:
	mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex
---

5f3fce4924f798cbdf119e36bfa8228ad5f922e3
diff --cc mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex
index 49ccbf7,88731ec..e876264
--- a/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex
+++ b/mpi-energy2-extension/Heter_paper.tex
@@@ -938,12 -938,11 +938,11 @@@ Table~\ref{tab:sc} shows the number of 
  
  
  The NAS parallel benchmarks are executed over these two platforms
 - with different number of nodes, as in Table \ref{tab:sc}. 
 + with different number of nodes, as in Table~\ref{tab:sc}. 
  The overall energy consumption of all the benchmarks solving the class D instance and
  using the proposed frequency selection algorithm is measured 
 -using the equation of the reduced energy consumption, equation 
 -(\ref{eq:energy}). This model uses the measured dynamic power showed in Table \ref{table:grid5000} and the static 
 +using the equation of the reduced energy consumption, Equation~\ref{eq:energy}. This model uses the measured dynamic power showed in Table~\ref{table:grid5000}
- 
 +and the static 
  power is assumed to be equal to 20\% of the dynamic power. The execution
  time is measured for all the benchmarks over these different scenarios.  
  
@@@ -1097,9 -1095,20 +1096,20 @@@ the one site one core scenario  when co
  More energy reduction can be gained when this ratio is big because it pushes the proposed scaling algorithm to select smaller frequencies that decrease the dynamic power consumption. These experiments also showed that the energy 
  consumption and the execution times of the EP and MG benchmarks do not change significantly over these two
  scenarios  because there are no or small communications. Contrary to EP and MG, the  energy consumptions and the execution times of the rest of the  benchmarks  vary according to the  communication times that are different from one scenario to the other.
-   
+ \begin{figure*}[t]
+   \centering
+     \subfloat[The energy saving of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multicores scenarios]{%
+     \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/eng_s_mc.eps}\label{fig:eng-s-mc}} \hspace{0.4cm}%
+     \subfloat[The performance degradation of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multicores scenarios
+       ]{%
+     \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/per_d_mc.eps}\label{fig:per-d-mc}}\hspace{0.4cm}%
+     \subfloat[The tradeoff distance of running NAS benchmarks over one core and multicores scenarios]{%
+     \includegraphics[width=.48\textwidth]{fig/dist_mc.eps}\label{fig:dist-mc}}
+   \label{fig:exp-res}
+   \caption{The experimental results of one core and multi-cores scenarios}
+ \end{figure*}  
    
 -The energy saving percentages of all NAS benchmarks running over these two scenarios are presented in figure \ref{fig:eng-s-mc}. 
 +The energy saving percentages of all NAS benchmarks running over these two scenarios are presented in Figure~\ref{fig:eng-s-mc}. 
  The figure shows that  the energy saving percentages in the one 
  core and the multi-cores scenarios
  are approximately equivalent, on average they are equal to  25.9\% and 25.1\% respectively.