X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/prng_gpu.git/blobdiff_plain/9000a5dc19eb61806daa88858a42b7a433da0c5d..02b8e8e685923bf2b12d529361c3435c0291337d:/prng_gpu.tex?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/prng_gpu.tex b/prng_gpu.tex index 19adf22..150e434 100644 --- a/prng_gpu.tex +++ b/prng_gpu.tex @@ -44,6 +44,14 @@ Guyeux\thanks{Authors in alphabetic order}} \maketitle \begin{abstract} +In this paper we present a new produce pseudo-random numbers generator (PRNG) on +graphics processing units (GPU). This PRNG is based on chaotic iterations. it +is proven to be chaotic in the Devany's formulation. We propose an efficient +implementation for GPU which succeeds to the {\it BigCrush}, the hardest +batteries of test of TestU01. Experimentations show that this PRNG can generate +about 20 billions of random numbers per second on Tesla C1060 and NVidia GTX280 +cards. + \end{abstract} @@ -63,7 +71,7 @@ Concerning the chaotic properties, Devaney~\cite{Devaney} proposed a common mathematical formulation of chaotic dynamical systems. In a previous work~\cite{bgw09:ip} we have proposed a new familly of chaotic -PRNG based on chaotic iterations (IC). We have proven that these PRNGs are +PRNG based on chaotic iterations. We have proven that these PRNGs are chaotic in the Devaney's sense. In this paper we propose a faster version which is also proven to be chaotic. @@ -74,19 +82,23 @@ numbers inside a GPU when a scientific application runs in a GPU. That is why we also provide an efficient PRNG for GPU respecting based on IC. Such devices allows us to generated almost 20 billions of random numbers per second. -In order to establish +In order to establish that our PRNGs are chaotic according to the Devaney's +formulation, we extend what we have proposed in~\cite{guyeux10}. Moreover, we +define a new distance to measure the disorder in the chaos and we prove some +interesting properties with this distance. The rest of this paper is organised as follows. In Section~\ref{section:related - works} we review some GPU implementions of PRNG. Section~\ref{sec:chaotic - iterations} gives some basic recalls on Devanay's formation of chaos and -chaotic iterations. In Section~\ref{sec:pseudo-random} the proof of chaos of our -PRNGs is studied. Section~\ref{sec:efficient prng} presents an efficient + works} we review some GPU implementions of PRNG. Section~\ref{section:BASIC + RECALLS} gives some basic recalls on Devanay's formation of chaos and chaotic +iterations. In Section~\ref{sec:pseudo-random} the proof of chaos of our PRNGs +is studied. Section~\ref{sec:efficient prng} presents an efficient implementation of our chaotic PRNG on a CPU. Section~\ref{sec:efficient prng gpu} describes the GPU implementation of our chaotic PRNG. In Section~\ref{sec:experiments} some experimentations are presented. Section~\ref{sec:de la relativité du désordre} describes the relativity of -disorder. In Section~\ref{sec: chaos order topology} the proof that chaotic -iterations can be described by iterations on a real interval is established. Finally, we give a conclusion and some perspectives. +disorder. In Section~\ref{sec: chaos order topology} the proof that chaotic +iterations can be described by iterations on a real interval is +established. Finally, we give a conclusion and some perspectives. @@ -748,29 +760,7 @@ x \oplus S^i&=&1&1&0&1&1&1&0&0&0&1&1&1&0&1&0&1\\ \end{array} $$ -%% \begin{figure}[htbp] -%% \begin{center} -%% \fbox{ -%% \begin{minipage}{14cm} -%% unsigned int CIprng() \{\\ -%% static unsigned int x = 123123123;\\ -%% unsigned long t1 = xorshift();\\ -%% unsigned long t2 = xor128();\\ -%% unsigned long t3 = xorwow();\\ -%% x = x\textasciicircum (unsigned int)t1;\\ -%% x = x\textasciicircum (unsigned int)(t2$>>$32);\\ -%% x = x\textasciicircum (unsigned int)(t3$>>$32);\\ -%% x = x\textasciicircum (unsigned int)t2;\\ -%% x = x\textasciicircum (unsigned int)(t1$>>$32);\\ -%% x = x\textasciicircum (unsigned int)t3;\\ -%% return x;\\ -%% \} -%% \end{minipage} -%% } -%% \end{center} -%% \caption{sequential Chaotic Iteration PRNG} -%% \label{algo:seqCIprng} -%% \end{figure} + @@ -817,8 +807,8 @@ the larger the number of threads is, the more local memory is used and the less branching instructions are used (if, while, ...), the better performance is obtained on GPU. So with algorithm \ref{algo:seqCIprng} presented in the previous section, it is possible to build a similar program which computes PRNG -on GPU. In the CUDA [ref] environment, threads have a local identificator, -called \texttt{ThreadIdx} relative to the block containing them. +on GPU. In the CUDA~\cite{Nvid10} environment, threads have a local +identificator, called \texttt{ThreadIdx} relative to the block containing them. \subsection{Naive version for GPU} @@ -828,14 +818,14 @@ The principe consists in assigning the computation of a PRNG as in sequential to each thread of the GPU. Of course, it is essential that the three xor-like PRNGs used for our computation have different parameters. So we chose them randomly with another PRNG. As the initialisation is performed by the CPU, we -have chosen to use the ISAAC PRNG [ref] to initalize all the parameters for the -GPU version of our PRNG. The implementation of the three xor-like PRNGs is -straightforward as soon as their parameters have been allocated in the GPU -memory. Each xor-like PRNGs used works with an internal number $x$ which keeps -the last generated random numbers. Other internal variables are also used by the -xor-like PRNGs. More precisely, the implementation of the xor128, the xorshift -and the xorwow respectively require 4, 5 and 6 unsigned long as internal -variables. +have chosen to use the ISAAC PRNG~\cite{Jenkins96} to initalize all the +parameters for the GPU version of our PRNG. The implementation of the three +xor-like PRNGs is straightforward as soon as their parameters have been +allocated in the GPU memory. Each xor-like PRNGs used works with an internal +number $x$ which keeps the last generated random numbers. Other internal +variables are also used by the xor-like PRNGs. More precisely, the +implementation of the xor128, the xorshift and the xorwow respectively require +4, 5 and 6 unsigned long as internal variables. \begin{algorithm} @@ -895,7 +885,7 @@ which represent the indexes of the other threads for which the results are used by the current thread. In the algorithm, we consider that a 64-bits xor-like PRNG is used, that is why both 32-bits parts are used. -This version also succeed to the BigCrush batteries of tests. +This version also succeeds to the {\it BigCrush} batteries of tests. \begin{algorithm} @@ -906,17 +896,15 @@ tab1, tab2: Arrays containing permutations of size permutation\_size\;} \KwOut{NewNb: array containing random numbers in global memory} \If{threadId is concerned} { - retrieve data from InternalVarXorLikeArray[threadId] in local variables\; + retrieve data from InternalVarXorLikeArray[threadId] in local variables including shared memory\; offset = threadIdx\%permutation\_size\; o1 = threadIdx-offset+tab1[offset]\; o2 = threadIdx-offset+tab2[offset]\; \For{i=1 to n} { t=xor-like()\; - shared\_mem[threadId]=(unsigned int)t\; - x = x $\oplus$ (unsigned int) t\; - x = x $\oplus$ (unsigned int) (t>>32)\; - x = x $\oplus$ shared[o1]\; - x = x $\oplus$ shared[o2]\; + t=t$\oplus$shmem[o1]$\oplus$shmem[o2]\; + shared\_mem[threadId]=t\; + x = x $\oplus$ t\; store the new PRNG in NewNb[NumThreads*threadId+i]\; } @@ -930,9 +918,9 @@ version} \subsection{Theoretical Evaluation of the Improved Version} -A run of Algorithm~\ref{algo:gpu_kernel2} consists in four operations having +A run of Algorithm~\ref{algo:gpu_kernel2} consists in three operations having the form of Equation~\ref{equation Oplus}, which is equivalent to the iterative -system of Eq.~\ref{eq:generalIC}. That is, four iterations of the general chaotic +system of Eq.~\ref{eq:generalIC}. That is, three iterations of the general chaotic iterations are realized between two stored values of the PRNG. To be certain that we are in the framework of Theorem~\ref{t:chaos des general}, we must guarantee that this dynamical system iterates on the space @@ -954,549 +942,571 @@ Devaney's formulation of a chaotic behavior. \section{Experiments} \label{sec:experiments} -Different experiments have been performed in order to measure the generation -speed. -\begin{figure}[t] +Different experiments have been performed in order to measure the generation +speed. We have used a computer equiped with Tesla C1060 NVidia GPU card and an +Intel Xeon E5530 cadenced at 2.40 GHz for our experiments and we have used +another one equipped with a less performant CPU and a GeForce GTX 280. Both +cards have 240 cores. + +In Figure~\ref{fig:time_gpu} we compare the number of random numbers generated +per second. The xor-like prng is a xor64 described in~\cite{Marsaglia2003}. In +order to obtain the optimal performance we remove the storage of random numbers +in the GPU memory. This step is time consumming and slows down the random number +generation. Moreover, if you are interested by applications that consome random +numbers directly when they are generated, their storage is completely +useless. In this figure we can see that when the number of threads is greater +than approximately 30,000 upto 5 millions the number of random numbers generated +per second is almost constant. With the naive version, it is between 2.5 and +3GSample/s. With the optimized version, it is approximately equals to +20GSample/s. Finally we can remark that both GPU cards are quite similar. In +practice, the Tesla C1060 has more memory than the GTX 280 and this memory +should be of better quality. + +\begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=.7]{curve_time_gpu.pdf} \end{center} \caption{Number of random numbers generated per second} -\label{fig:time_naive_gpu} +\label{fig:time_gpu} \end{figure} -First of all we have compared the time to generate X random numbers with both -the CPU version and the GPU version. - -Faire une courbe du nombre de random en fonction du nombre de threads, -éventuellement en fonction du nombres de threads par bloc. - - - -\section{The relativity of disorder} -\label{sec:de la relativité du désordre} +In comparison, Listing~\ref{algo:seqCIprng} allows us to generate about +138MSample/s with only one core of the Xeon E5530. -In the next two sections, we investigate the impact of the choices that have -lead to the definitions of measures in Sections \ref{sec:chaotic iterations} and \ref{deuxième def}. -\subsection{Impact of the topology's finenesse} -Let us firstly introduce the following notations. -\begin{notation} -$\mathcal{X}_\tau$ will denote the topological space -$\left(\mathcal{X},\tau\right)$, whereas $\mathcal{V}_\tau (x)$ will be the set -of all the neighborhoods of $x$ when considering the topology $\tau$ (or simply -$\mathcal{V} (x)$, if there is no ambiguity). -\end{notation} +\section{Cryptanalysis of the Proposed PRNG} -\begin{theorem} -\label{Th:chaos et finesse} -Let $\mathcal{X}$ a set and $\tau, \tau'$ two topologies on $\mathcal{X}$ s.t. -$\tau'$ is finer than $\tau$. Let $f:\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X}$, continuous -both for $\tau$ and $\tau'$. - -If $(\mathcal{X}_{\tau'},f)$ is chaotic according to Devaney, then -$(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$ is chaotic too. -\end{theorem} - -\begin{proof} -Let us firstly establish the transitivity of $(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$. - -Let $\omega_1, \omega_2$ two open sets of $\tau$. Then $\omega_1, \omega_2 \in -\tau'$, becaus $\tau'$ is finer than $\tau$. As $f$ is $\tau'-$transitive, we -can deduce that $\exists n \in \mathds{N}, \omega_1 \cap f^{(n)}(\omega_2) = -\varnothing$. Consequently, $f$ is $\tau-$transitive. +Mettre ici la preuve de PCH -Let us now consider the regularity of $(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$, \emph{i.e.}, for -all $x \in \mathcal{X}$, and for all $\tau-$neighborhood $V$ of $x$, there is a -periodic point for $f$ into $V$. - -Let $x \in \mathcal{X}$ and $V \in \mathcal{V}_\tau (x)$ a $\tau-$neighborhood -of $x$. By definition, $\exists \omega \in \tau, x \in \omega \subset V$. - -But $\tau \subset \tau'$, so $\omega \in \tau'$, and then $V \in -\mathcal{V}_{\tau'} (x)$. As $(\mathcal{X}_{\tau'},f)$ is regular, there is a -periodic point for $f$ into $V$, and the regularity of $(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$ is -proven. -\end{proof} - -\subsection{A given system can always be claimed as chaotic} - -Let $f$ an iteration function on $\mathcal{X}$ having at least a fixed point. -Then this function is chaotic (in a certain way): - -\begin{theorem} -Let $\mathcal{X}$ a nonempty set and $f: \mathcal{X} \to \X$ a function having -at least a fixed point. -Then $f$ is $\tau_0-$chaotic, where $\tau_0$ is the trivial (indiscrete) -topology on $\X$. -\end{theorem} - - -\begin{proof} -$f$ is transitive when $\forall \omega, \omega' \in \tau_0 \setminus -\{\varnothing\}, \exists n \in \mathds{N}, f^{(n)}(\omega) \cap \omega' \neq -\varnothing$. -As $\tau_0 = \left\{ \varnothing, \X \right\}$, this is equivalent to look for -an integer $n$ s.t. $f^{(n)}\left( \X \right) \cap \X \neq \varnothing$. For -instance, $n=0$ is appropriate. +%\section{The relativity of disorder} +%\label{sec:de la relativité du désordre} -Let us now consider $x \in \X$ and $V \in \mathcal{V}_{\tau_0} (x)$. Then $V = -\mathcal{X}$, so $V$ has at least a fixed point for $f$. Consequently $f$ is -regular, and the result is established. -\end{proof} +%In the next two sections, we investigate the impact of the choices that have +%lead to the definitions of measures in Sections \ref{sec:chaotic iterations} and \ref{deuxième def}. +%\subsection{Impact of the topology's finenesse} +%Let us firstly introduce the following notations. +%\begin{notation} +%$\mathcal{X}_\tau$ will denote the topological space +%$\left(\mathcal{X},\tau\right)$, whereas $\mathcal{V}_\tau (x)$ will be the set +%of all the neighborhoods of $x$ when considering the topology $\tau$ (or simply +%$\mathcal{V} (x)$, if there is no ambiguity). +%\end{notation} -\subsection{A given system can always be claimed as non-chaotic} -\begin{theorem} -Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a set and $f: \mathcal{X} \to \X$. -If $\X$ is infinite, then $\left( \X_{\tau_\infty}, f\right)$ is not chaotic -(for the Devaney's formulation), where $\tau_\infty$ is the discrete topology. -\end{theorem} -\begin{proof} -Let us prove it by contradiction, assuming that $\left(\X_{\tau_\infty}, -f\right)$ is both transitive and regular. +%\begin{theorem} +%\label{Th:chaos et finesse} +%Let $\mathcal{X}$ a set and $\tau, \tau'$ two topologies on $\mathcal{X}$ s.t. +%$\tau'$ is finer than $\tau$. Let $f:\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X}$, continuous +%both for $\tau$ and $\tau'$. -Let $x \in \X$ and $\{x\}$ one of its neighborhood. This neighborhood must -contain a periodic point for $f$, if we want that $\left(\X_{\tau_\infty}, -f\right)$ is regular. Then $x$ must be a periodic point of $f$. +%If $(\mathcal{X}_{\tau'},f)$ is chaotic according to Devaney, then +%$(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$ is chaotic too. +%\end{theorem} -Let $I_x = \left\{ f^{(n)}(x), n \in \mathds{N}\right\}$. This set is finite -because $x$ is periodic, and $\mathcal{X}$ is infinite, then $\exists y \in -\mathcal{X}, y \notin I_x$. +%\begin{proof} +%Let us firstly establish the transitivity of $(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$. -As $\left(\X_{\tau_\infty}, f\right)$ must be transitive, for all open nonempty -sets $A$ and $B$, an integer $n$ must satisfy $f^{(n)}(A) \cap B \neq -\varnothing$. However $\{x\}$ and $\{y\}$ are open sets and $y \notin I_x -\Rightarrow \forall n, f^{(n)}\left( \{x\} \right) \cap \{y\} = \varnothing$. -\end{proof} +%Let $\omega_1, \omega_2$ two open sets of $\tau$. Then $\omega_1, \omega_2 \in +%\tau'$, becaus $\tau'$ is finer than $\tau$. As $f$ is $\tau'-$transitive, we +%can deduce that $\exists n \in \mathds{N}, \omega_1 \cap f^{(n)}(\omega_2) = +%\varnothing$. Consequently, $f$ is $\tau-$transitive. +%Let us now consider the regularity of $(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$, \emph{i.e.}, for +%all $x \in \mathcal{X}$, and for all $\tau-$neighborhood $V$ of $x$, there is a +%periodic point for $f$ into $V$. +%Let $x \in \mathcal{X}$ and $V \in \mathcal{V}_\tau (x)$ a $\tau-$neighborhood +%of $x$. By definition, $\exists \omega \in \tau, x \in \omega \subset V$. +%But $\tau \subset \tau'$, so $\omega \in \tau'$, and then $V \in +%\mathcal{V}_{\tau'} (x)$. As $(\mathcal{X}_{\tau'},f)$ is regular, there is a +%periodic point for $f$ into $V$, and the regularity of $(\mathcal{X}_\tau,f)$ is +%proven. +%\end{proof} +%\subsection{A given system can always be claimed as chaotic} +%Let $f$ an iteration function on $\mathcal{X}$ having at least a fixed point. +%Then this function is chaotic (in a certain way): -\section{Chaos on the order topology} -\label{sec: chaos order topology} -\subsection{The phase space is an interval of the real line} +%\begin{theorem} +%Let $\mathcal{X}$ a nonempty set and $f: \mathcal{X} \to \X$ a function having +%at least a fixed point. +%Then $f$ is $\tau_0-$chaotic, where $\tau_0$ is the trivial (indiscrete) +%topology on $\X$. +%\end{theorem} -\subsubsection{Toward a topological semiconjugacy} -In what follows, our intention is to establish, by using a topological -semiconjugacy, that chaotic iterations over $\mathcal{X}$ can be described as -iterations on a real interval. To do so, we must firstly introduce some -notations and terminologies. +%\begin{proof} +%$f$ is transitive when $\forall \omega, \omega' \in \tau_0 \setminus +%\{\varnothing\}, \exists n \in \mathds{N}, f^{(n)}(\omega) \cap \omega' \neq +%\varnothing$. +%As $\tau_0 = \left\{ \varnothing, \X \right\}$, this is equivalent to look for +%an integer $n$ s.t. $f^{(n)}\left( \X \right) \cap \X \neq \varnothing$. For +%instance, $n=0$ is appropriate. -Let $\mathcal{S}_\mathsf{N}$ be the set of sequences belonging into $\llbracket -1; \mathsf{N}\rrbracket$ and $\mathcal{X}_{\mathsf{N}} = \mathcal{S}_\mathsf{N} -\times \B^\mathsf{N}$. +%Let us now consider $x \in \X$ and $V \in \mathcal{V}_{\tau_0} (x)$. Then $V = +%\mathcal{X}$, so $V$ has at least a fixed point for $f$. Consequently $f$ is +%regular, and the result is established. +%\end{proof} -\begin{definition} -The function $\varphi: \mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10} \rightarrow \big[ -0, 2^{10} \big[$ is defined by: -\begin{equation} - \begin{array}{cccl} -\varphi: & \mathcal{X}_{10} = \mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10}& -\longrightarrow & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ \\ - & (S,E) = \left((S^0, S^1, \hdots ); (E_0, \hdots, E_9)\right) & \longmapsto & -\varphi \left((S,E)\right) -\end{array} -\end{equation} -where $\varphi\left((S,E)\right)$ is the real number: -\begin{itemize} -\item whose integral part $e$ is $\displaystyle{\sum_{k=0}^9 2^{9-k} E_k}$, that -is, the binary digits of $e$ are $E_0 ~ E_1 ~ \hdots ~ E_9$. -\item whose decimal part $s$ is equal to $s = 0,S^0~ S^1~ S^2~ \hdots = -\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty} 10^{-k} S^{k-1}.$ -\end{itemize} -\end{definition} +%\subsection{A given system can always be claimed as non-chaotic} -$\varphi$ realizes the association between a point of $\mathcal{X}_{10}$ and a -real number into $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$. We must now translate the chaotic -iterations $\Go$ on this real interval. To do so, two intermediate functions -over $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ must be introduced: +%\begin{theorem} +%Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a set and $f: \mathcal{X} \to \X$. +%If $\X$ is infinite, then $\left( \X_{\tau_\infty}, f\right)$ is not chaotic +%(for the Devaney's formulation), where $\tau_\infty$ is the discrete topology. +%\end{theorem} +%\begin{proof} +%Let us prove it by contradiction, assuming that $\left(\X_{\tau_\infty}, +%f\right)$ is both transitive and regular. -\begin{definition} -\label{def:e et s} -Let $x \in \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ and: -\begin{itemize} -\item $e_0, \hdots, e_9$ the binary digits of the integral part of $x$: -$\displaystyle{\lfloor x \rfloor = \sum_{k=0}^{9} 2^{9-k} e_k}$. -\item $(s^k)_{k\in \mathds{N}}$ the digits of $x$, where the chosen decimal -decomposition of $x$ is the one that does not have an infinite number of 9: -$\displaystyle{x = \lfloor x \rfloor + \sum_{k=0}^{+\infty} s^k 10^{-k-1}}$. -\end{itemize} -$e$ and $s$ are thus defined as follows: -\begin{equation} -\begin{array}{cccl} -e: & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ & \longrightarrow & \mathds{B}^{10} \\ - & x & \longmapsto & (e_0, \hdots, e_9) -\end{array} -\end{equation} -and -\begin{equation} - \begin{array}{cccc} -s: & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ & \longrightarrow & \llbracket 0, 9 -\rrbracket^{\mathds{N}} \\ - & x & \longmapsto & (s^k)_{k \in \mathds{N}} -\end{array} -\end{equation} -\end{definition} +%Let $x \in \X$ and $\{x\}$ one of its neighborhood. This neighborhood must +%contain a periodic point for $f$, if we want that $\left(\X_{\tau_\infty}, +%f\right)$ is regular. Then $x$ must be a periodic point of $f$. -We are now able to define the function $g$, whose goal is to translate the -chaotic iterations $\Go$ on an interval of $\mathds{R}$. +%Let $I_x = \left\{ f^{(n)}(x), n \in \mathds{N}\right\}$. This set is finite +%because $x$ is periodic, and $\mathcal{X}$ is infinite, then $\exists y \in +%\mathcal{X}, y \notin I_x$. + +%As $\left(\X_{\tau_\infty}, f\right)$ must be transitive, for all open nonempty +%sets $A$ and $B$, an integer $n$ must satisfy $f^{(n)}(A) \cap B \neq +%\varnothing$. However $\{x\}$ and $\{y\}$ are open sets and $y \notin I_x +%\Rightarrow \forall n, f^{(n)}\left( \{x\} \right) \cap \{y\} = \varnothing$. +%\end{proof} + + + + + + +%\section{Chaos on the order topology} +%\label{sec: chaos order topology} +%\subsection{The phase space is an interval of the real line} + +%\subsubsection{Toward a topological semiconjugacy} + +%In what follows, our intention is to establish, by using a topological +%semiconjugacy, that chaotic iterations over $\mathcal{X}$ can be described as +%iterations on a real interval. To do so, we must firstly introduce some +%notations and terminologies. + +%Let $\mathcal{S}_\mathsf{N}$ be the set of sequences belonging into $\llbracket +%1; \mathsf{N}\rrbracket$ and $\mathcal{X}_{\mathsf{N}} = \mathcal{S}_\mathsf{N} +%\times \B^\mathsf{N}$. + + +%\begin{definition} +%The function $\varphi: \mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10} \rightarrow \big[ +%0, 2^{10} \big[$ is defined by: +%\begin{equation} +% \begin{array}{cccl} +%\varphi: & \mathcal{X}_{10} = \mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10}& +%\longrightarrow & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ \\ +% & (S,E) = \left((S^0, S^1, \hdots ); (E_0, \hdots, E_9)\right) & \longmapsto & +%\varphi \left((S,E)\right) +%\end{array} +%\end{equation} +%where $\varphi\left((S,E)\right)$ is the real number: +%\begin{itemize} +%\item whose integral part $e$ is $\displaystyle{\sum_{k=0}^9 2^{9-k} E_k}$, that +%is, the binary digits of $e$ are $E_0 ~ E_1 ~ \hdots ~ E_9$. +%\item whose decimal part $s$ is equal to $s = 0,S^0~ S^1~ S^2~ \hdots = +%\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty} 10^{-k} S^{k-1}.$ +%\end{itemize} +%\end{definition} + + + +%$\varphi$ realizes the association between a point of $\mathcal{X}_{10}$ and a +%real number into $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$. We must now translate the chaotic +%iterations $\Go$ on this real interval. To do so, two intermediate functions +%over $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ must be introduced: + + +%\begin{definition} +%\label{def:e et s} +%Let $x \in \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ and: +%\begin{itemize} +%\item $e_0, \hdots, e_9$ the binary digits of the integral part of $x$: +%$\displaystyle{\lfloor x \rfloor = \sum_{k=0}^{9} 2^{9-k} e_k}$. +%\item $(s^k)_{k\in \mathds{N}}$ the digits of $x$, where the chosen decimal +%decomposition of $x$ is the one that does not have an infinite number of 9: +%$\displaystyle{x = \lfloor x \rfloor + \sum_{k=0}^{+\infty} s^k 10^{-k-1}}$. +%\end{itemize} +%$e$ and $s$ are thus defined as follows: +%\begin{equation} +%\begin{array}{cccl} +%e: & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ & \longrightarrow & \mathds{B}^{10} \\ +% & x & \longmapsto & (e_0, \hdots, e_9) +%\end{array} +%\end{equation} +%and +%\begin{equation} +% \begin{array}{cccc} +%s: & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ & \longrightarrow & \llbracket 0, 9 +%\rrbracket^{\mathds{N}} \\ +% & x & \longmapsto & (s^k)_{k \in \mathds{N}} +%\end{array} +%\end{equation} +%\end{definition} + +%We are now able to define the function $g$, whose goal is to translate the +%chaotic iterations $\Go$ on an interval of $\mathds{R}$. + +%\begin{definition} +%$g:\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ \longrightarrow \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ is defined by: +%\begin{equation} +%\begin{array}{cccc} +%g: & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ & \longrightarrow & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ \\ +% & x & \longmapsto & g(x) +%\end{array} +%\end{equation} +%where g(x) is the real number of $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ defined bellow: +%\begin{itemize} +%\item its integral part has a binary decomposition equal to $e_0', \hdots, +%e_9'$, with: +% \begin{equation} +%e_i' = \left\{ +%\begin{array}{ll} +%e(x)_i & \textrm{ if } i \neq s^0\\ +%e(x)_i + 1 \textrm{ (mod 2)} & \textrm{ if } i = s^0\\ +%\end{array} +%\right. +%\end{equation} +%\item whose decimal part is $s(x)^1, s(x)^2, \hdots$ +%\end{itemize} +%\end{definition} + +%\bigskip + + +%In other words, if $x = \displaystyle{\sum_{k=0}^{9} 2^{9-k} e_k + +%\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty} s^{k} ~10^{-k-1}}$, then: +%\begin{equation} +%g(x) = +%\displaystyle{\sum_{k=0}^{9} 2^{9-k} (e_k + \delta(k,s^0) \textrm{ (mod 2)}) + +%\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty} s^{k+1} 10^{-k-1}}. +%\end{equation} + + +%\subsubsection{Defining a metric on $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$} + +%Numerous metrics can be defined on the set $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$, the most +%usual one being the Euclidian distance recalled bellow: + +%\begin{notation} +%\index{distance!euclidienne} +%$\Delta$ is the Euclidian distance on $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$, that is, +%$\Delta(x,y) = |y-x|^2$. +%\end{notation} + +%\medskip + +%This Euclidian distance does not reproduce exactly the notion of proximity +%induced by our first distance $d$ on $\X$. Indeed $d$ is finer than $\Delta$. +%This is the reason why we have to introduce the following metric: + + + +%\begin{definition} +%Let $x,y \in \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$. +%$D$ denotes the function from $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[^2$ to $\mathds{R}^+$ +%defined by: $D(x,y) = D_e\left(e(x),e(y)\right) + D_s\left(s(x),s(y)\right)$, +%where: +%\begin{center} +%$\displaystyle{D_e(E,\check{E}) = \sum_{k=0}^\mathsf{9} \delta (E_k, +%\check{E}_k)}$, ~~and~ $\displaystyle{D_s(S,\check{S}) = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty +%\dfrac{|S^k-\check{S}^k|}{10^k}}$. +%\end{center} +%\end{definition} + +%\begin{proposition} +%$D$ is a distance on $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$. +%\end{proposition} + +%\begin{proof} +%The three axioms defining a distance must be checked. +%\begin{itemize} +%\item $D \geqslant 0$, because everything is positive in its definition. If +%$D(x,y)=0$, then $D_e(x,y)=0$, so the integral parts of $x$ and $y$ are equal +%(they have the same binary decomposition). Additionally, $D_s(x,y) = 0$, then +%$\forall k \in \mathds{N}^*, s(x)^k = s(y)^k$. In other words, $x$ and $y$ have +%the same $k-$th decimal digit, $\forall k \in \mathds{N}^*$. And so $x=y$. +%\item $D(x,y)=D(y,x)$. +%\item Finally, the triangular inequality is obtained due to the fact that both +%$\delta$ and $\Delta(x,y)=|x-y|$ satisfy it. +%\end{itemize} +%\end{proof} + + +%The convergence of sequences according to $D$ is not the same than the usual +%convergence related to the Euclidian metric. For instance, if $x^n \to x$ +%according to $D$, then necessarily the integral part of each $x^n$ is equal to +%the integral part of $x$ (at least after a given threshold), and the decimal +%part of $x^n$ corresponds to the one of $x$ ``as far as required''. +%To illustrate this fact, a comparison between $D$ and the Euclidian distance is +%given Figure \ref{fig:comparaison de distances}. These illustrations show that +%$D$ is richer and more refined than the Euclidian distance, and thus is more +%precise. + + +%\begin{figure}[t] +%\begin{center} +% \subfigure[Function $x \to dist(x;1,234) $ on the interval +%$(0;5)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{DvsEuclidien.pdf}}\quad +% \subfigure[Function $x \to dist(x;3) $ on the interval +%$(0;5)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{DvsEuclidien2.pdf}} +%\end{center} +%\caption{Comparison between $D$ (in blue) and the Euclidian distane (in green).} +%\label{fig:comparaison de distances} +%\end{figure} + + + + +%\subsubsection{The semiconjugacy} + +%It is now possible to define a topological semiconjugacy between $\mathcal{X}$ +%and an interval of $\mathds{R}$: + +%\begin{theorem} +%Chaotic iterations on the phase space $\mathcal{X}$ are simple iterations on +%$\mathds{R}$, which is illustrated by the semiconjugacy of the diagram bellow: +%\begin{equation*} +%\begin{CD} +%\left(~\mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10}, d~\right) @>G_{f_0}>> +%\left(~\mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10}, d~\right)\\ +% @V{\varphi}VV @VV{\varphi}V\\ +%\left( ~\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[, D~\right) @>>g> \left(~\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[, +%D~\right) +%\end{CD} +%\end{equation*} +%\end{theorem} + +%\begin{proof} +%$\varphi$ has been constructed in order to be continuous and onto. +%\end{proof} + +%In other words, $\mathcal{X}$ is approximately equal to $\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} +%\big[$. + + + + + + +%\subsection{Study of the chaotic iterations described as a real function} + + +%\begin{figure}[t] +%\begin{center} +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(0,9;1)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs09a1.pdf}}\quad +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(0,7;1)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs07a95.pdf}}\\ +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(0,5;1)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs05a1.pdf}}\quad +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(0;1)$]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs0a1.pdf}} +%\end{center} +%\caption{Representation of the chaotic iterations.} +%\label{fig:ICs} +%\end{figure} + + + + +%\begin{figure}[t] +%\begin{center} +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(510;514)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs510a514.pdf}}\quad +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(1000;1008)$]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs1000a1008.pdf}} +%\end{center} +%\caption{ICs on small intervals.} +%\label{fig:ICs2} +%\end{figure} + +%\begin{figure}[t] +%\begin{center} +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(0;16)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.3]{ICs0a16.pdf}}\quad +% \subfigure[ICs on the interval +%$(40;70)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.45]{ICs40a70.pdf}}\quad +%\end{center} +%\caption{General aspect of the chaotic iterations.} +%\label{fig:ICs3} +%\end{figure} + + +%We have written a Python program to represent the chaotic iterations with the +%vectorial negation on the real line $\mathds{R}$. Various representations of +%these CIs are given in Figures \ref{fig:ICs}, \ref{fig:ICs2} and \ref{fig:ICs3}. +%It can be remarked that the function $g$ is a piecewise linear function: it is +%linear on each interval having the form $\left[ \dfrac{n}{10}, +%\dfrac{n+1}{10}\right[$, $n \in \llbracket 0;2^{10}\times 10 \rrbracket$ and its +%slope is equal to 10. Let us justify these claims: + +%\begin{proposition} +%\label{Prop:derivabilite des ICs} +%Chaotic iterations $g$ defined on $\mathds{R}$ have derivatives of all orders on +%$\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$, except on the 10241 points in $I$ defined by $\left\{ +%\dfrac{n}{10} ~\big/~ n \in \llbracket 0;2^{10}\times 10\rrbracket \right\}$. + +%Furthermore, on each interval of the form $\left[ \dfrac{n}{10}, +%\dfrac{n+1}{10}\right[$, with $n \in \llbracket 0;2^{10}\times 10 \rrbracket$, +%$g$ is a linear function, having a slope equal to 10: $\forall x \notin I, +%g'(x)=10$. +%\end{proposition} -\begin{definition} -$g:\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ \longrightarrow \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ is defined by: -\begin{equation} -\begin{array}{cccc} -g: & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ & \longrightarrow & \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[ \\ - & x & \longmapsto & g(x) -\end{array} -\end{equation} -where g(x) is the real number of $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$ defined bellow: -\begin{itemize} -\item its integral part has a binary decomposition equal to $e_0', \hdots, -e_9'$, with: - \begin{equation} -e_i' = \left\{ -\begin{array}{ll} -e(x)_i & \textrm{ if } i \neq s^0\\ -e(x)_i + 1 \textrm{ (mod 2)} & \textrm{ if } i = s^0\\ -\end{array} -\right. -\end{equation} -\item whose decimal part is $s(x)^1, s(x)^2, \hdots$ -\end{itemize} -\end{definition} - -\bigskip - - -In other words, if $x = \displaystyle{\sum_{k=0}^{9} 2^{9-k} e_k + -\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty} s^{k} ~10^{-k-1}}$, then: -\begin{equation} -g(x) = -\displaystyle{\sum_{k=0}^{9} 2^{9-k} (e_k + \delta(k,s^0) \textrm{ (mod 2)}) + -\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty} s^{k+1} 10^{-k-1}}. -\end{equation} - - -\subsubsection{Defining a metric on $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$} - -Numerous metrics can be defined on the set $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$, the most -usual one being the Euclidian distance recalled bellow: - -\begin{notation} -\index{distance!euclidienne} -$\Delta$ is the Euclidian distance on $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$, that is, -$\Delta(x,y) = |y-x|^2$. -\end{notation} - -\medskip - -This Euclidian distance does not reproduce exactly the notion of proximity -induced by our first distance $d$ on $\X$. Indeed $d$ is finer than $\Delta$. -This is the reason why we have to introduce the following metric: - - - -\begin{definition} -Let $x,y \in \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$. -$D$ denotes the function from $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[^2$ to $\mathds{R}^+$ -defined by: $D(x,y) = D_e\left(e(x),e(y)\right) + D_s\left(s(x),s(y)\right)$, -where: -\begin{center} -$\displaystyle{D_e(E,\check{E}) = \sum_{k=0}^\mathsf{9} \delta (E_k, -\check{E}_k)}$, ~~and~ $\displaystyle{D_s(S,\check{S}) = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty -\dfrac{|S^k-\check{S}^k|}{10^k}}$. -\end{center} -\end{definition} - -\begin{proposition} -$D$ is a distance on $\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$. -\end{proposition} - -\begin{proof} -The three axioms defining a distance must be checked. -\begin{itemize} -\item $D \geqslant 0$, because everything is positive in its definition. If -$D(x,y)=0$, then $D_e(x,y)=0$, so the integral parts of $x$ and $y$ are equal -(they have the same binary decomposition). Additionally, $D_s(x,y) = 0$, then -$\forall k \in \mathds{N}^*, s(x)^k = s(y)^k$. In other words, $x$ and $y$ have -the same $k-$th decimal digit, $\forall k \in \mathds{N}^*$. And so $x=y$. -\item $D(x,y)=D(y,x)$. -\item Finally, the triangular inequality is obtained due to the fact that both -$\delta$ and $\Delta(x,y)=|x-y|$ satisfy it. -\end{itemize} -\end{proof} - - -The convergence of sequences according to $D$ is not the same than the usual -convergence related to the Euclidian metric. For instance, if $x^n \to x$ -according to $D$, then necessarily the integral part of each $x^n$ is equal to -the integral part of $x$ (at least after a given threshold), and the decimal -part of $x^n$ corresponds to the one of $x$ ``as far as required''. -To illustrate this fact, a comparison between $D$ and the Euclidian distance is -given Figure \ref{fig:comparaison de distances}. These illustrations show that -$D$ is richer and more refined than the Euclidian distance, and thus is more -precise. - - -\begin{figure}[t] -\begin{center} - \subfigure[Function $x \to dist(x;1,234) $ on the interval -$(0;5)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{DvsEuclidien.pdf}}\quad - \subfigure[Function $x \to dist(x;3) $ on the interval -$(0;5)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{DvsEuclidien2.pdf}} -\end{center} -\caption{Comparison between $D$ (in blue) and the Euclidian distane (in green).} -\label{fig:comparaison de distances} -\end{figure} - - - - -\subsubsection{The semiconjugacy} - -It is now possible to define a topological semiconjugacy between $\mathcal{X}$ -and an interval of $\mathds{R}$: - -\begin{theorem} -Chaotic iterations on the phase space $\mathcal{X}$ are simple iterations on -$\mathds{R}$, which is illustrated by the semiconjugacy of the diagram bellow: -\begin{equation*} -\begin{CD} -\left(~\mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10}, d~\right) @>G_{f_0}>> -\left(~\mathcal{S}_{10} \times\mathds{B}^{10}, d~\right)\\ - @V{\varphi}VV @VV{\varphi}V\\ -\left( ~\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[, D~\right) @>>g> \left(~\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[, -D~\right) -\end{CD} -\end{equation*} -\end{theorem} - -\begin{proof} -$\varphi$ has been constructed in order to be continuous and onto. -\end{proof} - -In other words, $\mathcal{X}$ is approximately equal to $\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} -\big[$. - - - - - - -\subsection{Study of the chaotic iterations described as a real function} - - -\begin{figure}[t] -\begin{center} - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(0,9;1)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs09a1.pdf}}\quad - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(0,7;1)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs07a95.pdf}}\\ - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(0,5;1)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs05a1.pdf}}\quad - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(0;1)$]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs0a1.pdf}} -\end{center} -\caption{Representation of the chaotic iterations.} -\label{fig:ICs} -\end{figure} - - - - -\begin{figure}[t] -\begin{center} - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(510;514)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs510a514.pdf}}\quad - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(1000;1008)$]{\includegraphics[scale=.35]{ICs1000a1008.pdf}} -\end{center} -\caption{ICs on small intervals.} -\label{fig:ICs2} -\end{figure} - -\begin{figure}[t] -\begin{center} - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(0;16)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.3]{ICs0a16.pdf}}\quad - \subfigure[ICs on the interval -$(40;70)$.]{\includegraphics[scale=.45]{ICs40a70.pdf}}\quad -\end{center} -\caption{General aspect of the chaotic iterations.} -\label{fig:ICs3} -\end{figure} - - -We have written a Python program to represent the chaotic iterations with the -vectorial negation on the real line $\mathds{R}$. Various representations of -these CIs are given in Figures \ref{fig:ICs}, \ref{fig:ICs2} and \ref{fig:ICs3}. -It can be remarked that the function $g$ is a piecewise linear function: it is -linear on each interval having the form $\left[ \dfrac{n}{10}, -\dfrac{n+1}{10}\right[$, $n \in \llbracket 0;2^{10}\times 10 \rrbracket$ and its -slope is equal to 10. Let us justify these claims: - -\begin{proposition} -\label{Prop:derivabilite des ICs} -Chaotic iterations $g$ defined on $\mathds{R}$ have derivatives of all orders on -$\big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[$, except on the 10241 points in $I$ defined by $\left\{ -\dfrac{n}{10} ~\big/~ n \in \llbracket 0;2^{10}\times 10\rrbracket \right\}$. - -Furthermore, on each interval of the form $\left[ \dfrac{n}{10}, -\dfrac{n+1}{10}\right[$, with $n \in \llbracket 0;2^{10}\times 10 \rrbracket$, -$g$ is a linear function, having a slope equal to 10: $\forall x \notin I, -g'(x)=10$. -\end{proposition} - - -\begin{proof} -Let $I_n = \left[ \dfrac{n}{10}, \dfrac{n+1}{10}\right[$, with $n \in \llbracket -0;2^{10}\times 10 \rrbracket$. All the points of $I_n$ have the same integral -prat $e$ and the same decimal part $s^0$: on the set $I_n$, functions $e(x)$ -and $x \mapsto s(x)^0$ of Definition \ref{def:e et s} only depend on $n$. So all -the images $g(x)$ of these points $x$: -\begin{itemize} -\item Have the same integral part, which is $e$, except probably the bit number -$s^0$. In other words, this integer has approximately the same binary -decomposition than $e$, the sole exception being the digit $s^0$ (this number is -then either $e+2^{10-s^0}$ or $e-2^{10-s^0}$, depending on the parity of $s^0$, -\emph{i.e.}, it is equal to $e+(-1)^{s^0}\times 2^{10-s^0}$). -\item A shift to the left has been applied to the decimal part $y$, losing by -doing so the common first digit $s^0$. In other words, $y$ has been mapped into -$10\times y - s^0$. -\end{itemize} -To sum up, the action of $g$ on the points of $I$ is as follows: first, make a -multiplication by 10, and second, add the same constant to each term, which is -$\dfrac{1}{10}\left(e+(-1)^{s^0}\times 2^{10-s^0}\right)-s^0$. -\end{proof} - -\begin{remark} -Finally, chaotic iterations are elements of the large family of functions that -are both chaotic and piecewise linear (like the tent map). -\end{remark} - - - -\subsection{Comparison of the two metrics on $\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} \big[$} - -The two propositions bellow allow to compare our two distances on $\big[ 0, -2^\mathsf{N} \big[$: - -\begin{proposition} -Id: $\left(~\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} \big[,\Delta~\right) \to \left(~\big[ 0, -2^\mathsf{N} \big[, D~\right)$ is not continuous. -\end{proposition} - -\begin{proof} -The sequence $x^n = 1,999\hdots 999$ constituted by $n$ 9 as decimal part, is -such that: -\begin{itemize} -\item $\Delta (x^n,2) \to 0.$ -\item But $D(x^n,2) \geqslant 1$, then $D(x^n,2)$ does not converge to 0. -\end{itemize} - -The sequential characterization of the continuity concludes the demonstration. -\end{proof} - - - -A contrario: - -\begin{proposition} -Id: $\left(~\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} \big[,D~\right) \to \left(~\big[ 0, -2^\mathsf{N} \big[, \Delta ~\right)$ is a continuous fonction. -\end{proposition} - -\begin{proof} -If $D(x^n,x) \to 0$, then $D_e(x^n,x) = 0$ at least for $n$ larger than a given -threshold, because $D_e$ only returns integers. So, after this threshold, the -integral parts of all the $x^n$ are equal to the integral part of $x$. - -Additionally, $D_s(x^n, x) \to 0$, then $\forall k \in \mathds{N}^*, \exists N_k -\in \mathds{N}, n \geqslant N_k \Rightarrow D_s(x^n,x) \leqslant 10^{-k}$. This -means that for all $k$, an index $N_k$ can be found such that, $\forall n -\geqslant N_k$, all the $x^n$ have the same $k$ firsts digits, which are the -digits of $x$. We can deduce the convergence $\Delta(x^n,x) \to 0$, and thus the -result. -\end{proof} - -The conclusion of these propositions is that the proposed metric is more precise -than the Euclidian distance, that is: - -\begin{corollary} -$D$ is finer than the Euclidian distance $\Delta$. -\end{corollary} - -This corollary can be reformulated as follows: - -\begin{itemize} -\item The topology produced by $\Delta$ is a subset of the topology produced by -$D$. -\item $D$ has more open sets than $\Delta$. -\item It is harder to converge for the topology $\tau_D$ inherited by $D$, than -to converge with the one inherited by $\Delta$, which is denoted here by -$\tau_\Delta$. -\end{itemize} - - -\subsection{Chaos of the chaotic iterations on $\mathds{R}$} -\label{chpt:Chaos des itérations chaotiques sur R} - - - -\subsubsection{Chaos according to Devaney} - -We have recalled previously that the chaotic iterations $\left(\Go, -\mathcal{X}_d\right)$ are chaotic according to the formulation of Devaney. We -can deduce that they are chaotic on $\mathds{R}$ too, when considering the order -topology, because: -\begin{itemize} -\item $\left(\Go, \mathcal{X}_d\right)$ and $\left(g, \big[ 0, 2^{10} -\big[_D\right)$ are semiconjugate by $\varphi$, -\item Then $\left(g, \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[_D\right)$ is a system chaotic -according to Devaney, because the semiconjugacy preserve this character. -\item But the topology generated by $D$ is finer than the topology generated by -the Euclidian distance $\Delta$ -- which is the order topology. -\item According to Theorem \ref{Th:chaos et finesse}, we can deduce that the -chaotic iterations $g$ are indeed chaotic, as defined by Devaney, for the order -topology on $\mathds{R}$. -\end{itemize} - -This result can be formulated as follows. - -\begin{theorem} -\label{th:IC et topologie de l'ordre} -The chaotic iterations $g$ on $\mathds{R}$ are chaotic according to the -Devaney's formulation, when $\mathds{R}$ has his usual topology, which is the -order topology. -\end{theorem} -Indeed this result is weaker than the theorem establishing the chaos for the -finer topology $d$. However the Theorem \ref{th:IC et topologie de l'ordre} -still remains important. Indeed, we have studied in our previous works a set -different from the usual set of study ($\mathcal{X}$ instead of $\mathds{R}$), -in order to be as close as possible from the computer: the properties of -disorder proved theoretically will then be preserved when computing. However, we -could wonder whether this change does not lead to a disorder of a lower quality. -In other words, have we replaced a situation of a good disorder lost when -computing, to another situation of a disorder preserved but of bad quality. -Theorem \ref{th:IC et topologie de l'ordre} prove exactly the contrary. - +%\begin{proof} +%Let $I_n = \left[ \dfrac{n}{10}, \dfrac{n+1}{10}\right[$, with $n \in \llbracket +%0;2^{10}\times 10 \rrbracket$. All the points of $I_n$ have the same integral +%prat $e$ and the same decimal part $s^0$: on the set $I_n$, functions $e(x)$ +%and $x \mapsto s(x)^0$ of Definition \ref{def:e et s} only depend on $n$. So all +%the images $g(x)$ of these points $x$: +%\begin{itemize} +%\item Have the same integral part, which is $e$, except probably the bit number +%$s^0$. In other words, this integer has approximately the same binary +%decomposition than $e$, the sole exception being the digit $s^0$ (this number is +%then either $e+2^{10-s^0}$ or $e-2^{10-s^0}$, depending on the parity of $s^0$, +%\emph{i.e.}, it is equal to $e+(-1)^{s^0}\times 2^{10-s^0}$). +%\item A shift to the left has been applied to the decimal part $y$, losing by +%doing so the common first digit $s^0$. In other words, $y$ has been mapped into +%$10\times y - s^0$. +%\end{itemize} +%To sum up, the action of $g$ on the points of $I$ is as follows: first, make a +%multiplication by 10, and second, add the same constant to each term, which is +%$\dfrac{1}{10}\left(e+(-1)^{s^0}\times 2^{10-s^0}\right)-s^0$. +%\end{proof} + +%\begin{remark} +%Finally, chaotic iterations are elements of the large family of functions that +%are both chaotic and piecewise linear (like the tent map). +%\end{remark} + + + +%\subsection{Comparison of the two metrics on $\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} \big[$} + +%The two propositions bellow allow to compare our two distances on $\big[ 0, +%2^\mathsf{N} \big[$: + +%\begin{proposition} +%Id: $\left(~\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} \big[,\Delta~\right) \to \left(~\big[ 0, +%2^\mathsf{N} \big[, D~\right)$ is not continuous. +%\end{proposition} + +%\begin{proof} +%The sequence $x^n = 1,999\hdots 999$ constituted by $n$ 9 as decimal part, is +%such that: +%\begin{itemize} +%\item $\Delta (x^n,2) \to 0.$ +%\item But $D(x^n,2) \geqslant 1$, then $D(x^n,2)$ does not converge to 0. +%\end{itemize} + +%The sequential characterization of the continuity concludes the demonstration. +%\end{proof} + + + +%A contrario: + +%\begin{proposition} +%Id: $\left(~\big[ 0, 2^\mathsf{N} \big[,D~\right) \to \left(~\big[ 0, +%2^\mathsf{N} \big[, \Delta ~\right)$ is a continuous fonction. +%\end{proposition} + +%\begin{proof} +%If $D(x^n,x) \to 0$, then $D_e(x^n,x) = 0$ at least for $n$ larger than a given +%threshold, because $D_e$ only returns integers. So, after this threshold, the +%integral parts of all the $x^n$ are equal to the integral part of $x$. + +%Additionally, $D_s(x^n, x) \to 0$, then $\forall k \in \mathds{N}^*, \exists N_k +%\in \mathds{N}, n \geqslant N_k \Rightarrow D_s(x^n,x) \leqslant 10^{-k}$. This +%means that for all $k$, an index $N_k$ can be found such that, $\forall n +%\geqslant N_k$, all the $x^n$ have the same $k$ firsts digits, which are the +%digits of $x$. We can deduce the convergence $\Delta(x^n,x) \to 0$, and thus the +%result. +%\end{proof} + +%The conclusion of these propositions is that the proposed metric is more precise +%than the Euclidian distance, that is: + +%\begin{corollary} +%$D$ is finer than the Euclidian distance $\Delta$. +%\end{corollary} + +%This corollary can be reformulated as follows: + +%\begin{itemize} +%\item The topology produced by $\Delta$ is a subset of the topology produced by +%$D$. +%\item $D$ has more open sets than $\Delta$. +%\item It is harder to converge for the topology $\tau_D$ inherited by $D$, than +%to converge with the one inherited by $\Delta$, which is denoted here by +%$\tau_\Delta$. +%\end{itemize} + + +%\subsection{Chaos of the chaotic iterations on $\mathds{R}$} +%\label{chpt:Chaos des itérations chaotiques sur R} + + + +%\subsubsection{Chaos according to Devaney} + +%We have recalled previously that the chaotic iterations $\left(\Go, +%\mathcal{X}_d\right)$ are chaotic according to the formulation of Devaney. We +%can deduce that they are chaotic on $\mathds{R}$ too, when considering the order +%topology, because: +%\begin{itemize} +%\item $\left(\Go, \mathcal{X}_d\right)$ and $\left(g, \big[ 0, 2^{10} +%\big[_D\right)$ are semiconjugate by $\varphi$, +%\item Then $\left(g, \big[ 0, 2^{10} \big[_D\right)$ is a system chaotic +%according to Devaney, because the semiconjugacy preserve this character. +%\item But the topology generated by $D$ is finer than the topology generated by +%the Euclidian distance $\Delta$ -- which is the order topology. +%\item According to Theorem \ref{Th:chaos et finesse}, we can deduce that the +%chaotic iterations $g$ are indeed chaotic, as defined by Devaney, for the order +%topology on $\mathds{R}$. +%\end{itemize} + +%This result can be formulated as follows. + +%\begin{theorem} +%\label{th:IC et topologie de l'ordre} +%The chaotic iterations $g$ on $\mathds{R}$ are chaotic according to the +%Devaney's formulation, when $\mathds{R}$ has his usual topology, which is the +%order topology. +%\end{theorem} + +%Indeed this result is weaker than the theorem establishing the chaos for the +%finer topology $d$. However the Theorem \ref{th:IC et topologie de l'ordre} +%still remains important. Indeed, we have studied in our previous works a set +%different from the usual set of study ($\mathcal{X}$ instead of $\mathds{R}$), +%in order to be as close as possible from the computer: the properties of +%disorder proved theoretically will then be preserved when computing. However, we +%could wonder whether this change does not lead to a disorder of a lower quality. +%In other words, have we replaced a situation of a good disorder lost when +%computing, to another situation of a disorder preserved but of bad quality. +%Theorem \ref{th:IC et topologie de l'ordre} prove exactly the contrary. +%