resultats nist

[rairo15.git] / prng.tex

diff --git a/prng.tex b/prng.tex
index 3776d09ef95fe98f1968ee88c0d8829068eea25b..8b2f78fc0e8b31978a1aecd93a1b58c949f966e6 100644 (file)
--- a/prng.tex
+++ b/prng.tex
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ a random choice of which edge to follow, and traverses this edge
 provided it is allowed to do so, \textit{i.e.}, 
 when $\textit{Random}(1)$ is not null. 
 The final configuration is thus outputted.
 provided it is allowed to do so, \textit{i.e.}, 
 when $\textit{Random}(1)$ is not null. 
 The final configuration is thus outputted.

-This PRNG is formalized in Algorithm~\ref{CI Algorithm}.
+This PRNG is formalized in Algorithm~\ref{CI Algorithm:2}.

 
 
 
 
 
 


@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ $x\leftarrow{F_f(s,x)}$\;
 return $x$\;
 %\end{scriptsize}
 \caption{Pseudo Code of the $\chi_{\textit{15Rairo}}$ PRNG}
 return $x$\;
 %\end{scriptsize}
 \caption{Pseudo Code of the $\chi_{\textit{15Rairo}}$ PRNG}

-\label{CI Algorithm}
+\label{CI Algorithm:2}

 \end{algorithm}
 
 
 \end{algorithm}
 
 


@@ -226,6 +226,26 @@ achieve to pass the NIST battery of tests.
 \setlength{\tabcolsep}{2pt}
 
 
 \setlength{\tabcolsep}{2pt}
 
 

+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+Method &$\textcircled{a}$& $\textcircled{b}$ & $\textcircled{c}$ & $\textcircled{d}$ & $\textcircled{e}$   \\ \hline\hline
+Frequency (Monobit)& 0.851 (0.98)& 0.719 (0.99)& 0.699 (0.99)& 0.514 (1.0)& 0.798 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Frequency (Monobit)& 0.851 (0.98)& 0.719 (0.99)& 0.699 (0.99)& 0.514 (1.0)& 0.798 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Frequency  within a Block& 0.262 (0.98)& 0.699 (0.98)& 0.867 (0.99)& 0.145 (1.0)& 0.455 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Cumulative Sums (Cusum) *& 0.301 (0.98)& 0.521 (0.99)& 0.688 (0.99)& 0.888 (1.0)& 0.598 (1.0)\\ \hline 
+Runs& 0.224 (0.97)& 0.383 (0.97)& 0.108 (0.96)& 0.213 (0.99)& 0.616 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Longest Run of 1s & 0.383 (1.0)& 0.474 (1.0)& 0.983 (0.99)& 0.699 (0.98)& 0.897 (0.96)\\ \hline 
+Binary Matrix Rank& 0.213 (1.0)& 0.867 (0.99)& 0.494 (0.98)& 0.162 (0.99)& 0.924 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Disc. Fourier Transf. (Spect.)& 0.474 (1.0)& 0.739 (0.99)& 0.012 (1.0)& 0.678 (0.98)& 0.437 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Unoverlapping Templ. Match.*& 0.505 (0.990)& 0.521 (0.990)& 0.510 (0.989)& 0.511 (0.990)& 0.499 (0.990)\\ \hline 
+Overlapping Temp. Match.& 0.574 (0.98)& 0.304 (0.99)& 0.437 (0.97)& 0.759 (0.98)& 0.275 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Maurer's Universal Statistical& 0.759 (0.96)& 0.699 (0.97)& 0.191 (0.98)& 0.699 (1.0)& 0.798 (0.97)\\ \hline 
+Approximate Entropy (m=10)& 0.759 (0.99)& 0.162 (0.99)& 0.867 (0.99)& 0.534 (1.0)& 0.616 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+Random Excursions *& 0.666 (0.994)& 0.410 (0.962)& 0.287 (0.998)& 0.365 (0.994)& 0.480 (0.985)\\ \hline 
+Random Excursions Variant *& 0.337 (0.988)& 0.519 (0.984)& 0.549 (0.994)& 0.225 (0.995)& 0.533 (0.993)\\ \hline 
+Serial* (m=10)& 0.630 (0.99)& 0.529 (0.99)& 0.460 (0.99)& 0.302 (0.995)& 0.360 (0.985)\\ \hline 
+Linear Complexity& 0.719 (1.0)& 0.739 (0.99)& 0.759 (0.98)& 0.122 (0.97)& 0.514 (0.99)\\ \hline 
+\end{tabular}

 \end{scriptsize}
 \end{center}
 \caption{NIST SP 800-22 test results ($\mathbb{P}_T$)}
 \end{scriptsize}
 \end{center}
 \caption{NIST SP 800-22 test results ($\mathbb{P}_T$)}