X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/rairo15.git/blobdiff_plain/5207d2fe1ec5d598398e217569e592f0fb6a07ff..5a1853fca34ff9fb85e24965d2ae79c535c16b8d:/prng.tex diff --git a/prng.tex b/prng.tex index c565970..8b2f78f 100644 --- a/prng.tex +++ b/prng.tex @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ a random choice of which edge to follow, and traverses this edge provided it is allowed to do so, \textit{i.e.}, when $\textit{Random}(1)$ is not null. The final configuration is thus outputted. -This PRNG is formalized in Algorithm~\ref{CI Algorithm}. +This PRNG is formalized in Algorithm~\ref{CI Algorithm:2}. @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ $x\leftarrow{F_f(s,x)}$\; return $x$\; %\end{scriptsize} \caption{Pseudo Code of the $\chi_{\textit{15Rairo}}$ PRNG} -\label{CI Algorithm} +\label{CI Algorithm:2} \end{algorithm} @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ it preserves this property. For each number $\mathsf{N}=4,5,6,7,8$ of bits, we have generated -the functions according the method -given in Sect.~\ref{sec:SCCfunc} . +the functions according to the method +given in Sect.~\ref{sec:SCCfunc}. For each $\mathsf{N}$, we have then restricted this evaluation to the function whose Markov Matrix (issued from Eq.~(\ref{eq:Markov:rairo})) has the smallest practical mixing time. @@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ it is obtained as the binary value of the fourth element in the second list (namely~14). In this table the column -which is labeled with $b$ (respectively by $E[\tau]$) +that is labeled with $b$ (respectively by $E[\tau]$) gives the practical mixing time -where the deviation to the standard distribution is less than $10^{-6}$ +where the deviation to the standard distribution is lesser than $10^{-6}$ (resp. the theoretical upper bound of stopping time as described in Sect.~\ref{sec:hypercube}). @@ -214,7 +214,9 @@ If the value $\mathbb{P}_T$ of any test is smaller than 0.0001, the sequences ar and the generator is unsuitable. Table~\ref{The passing rate} shows $\mathbb{P}_T$ of sequences based on discrete chaotic iterations using different schemes. If there are at least two statistical values in a test, this test is marked with an asterisk and the average value is computed to characterize the statistics. -We can see in Table \ref{The passing rate} that all the rates are greater than 97/100, \textit{i. e.}, all the generators pass the NIST test. +We can see in Table \ref{The passing rate} that all the rates are greater than 97/100, \textit{i.e.}, all the generators +achieve to pass the NIST battery of tests. + \begin{table} @@ -224,6 +226,26 @@ We can see in Table \ref{The passing rate} that all the rates are greater than 9 \setlength{\tabcolsep}{2pt} +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} +\hline +Method &$\textcircled{a}$& $\textcircled{b}$ & $\textcircled{c}$ & $\textcircled{d}$ & $\textcircled{e}$ \\ \hline\hline +Frequency (Monobit)& 0.851 (0.98)& 0.719 (0.99)& 0.699 (0.99)& 0.514 (1.0)& 0.798 (0.99)\\ \hline +Frequency (Monobit)& 0.851 (0.98)& 0.719 (0.99)& 0.699 (0.99)& 0.514 (1.0)& 0.798 (0.99)\\ \hline +Frequency within a Block& 0.262 (0.98)& 0.699 (0.98)& 0.867 (0.99)& 0.145 (1.0)& 0.455 (0.99)\\ \hline +Cumulative Sums (Cusum) *& 0.301 (0.98)& 0.521 (0.99)& 0.688 (0.99)& 0.888 (1.0)& 0.598 (1.0)\\ \hline +Runs& 0.224 (0.97)& 0.383 (0.97)& 0.108 (0.96)& 0.213 (0.99)& 0.616 (0.99)\\ \hline +Longest Run of 1s & 0.383 (1.0)& 0.474 (1.0)& 0.983 (0.99)& 0.699 (0.98)& 0.897 (0.96)\\ \hline +Binary Matrix Rank& 0.213 (1.0)& 0.867 (0.99)& 0.494 (0.98)& 0.162 (0.99)& 0.924 (0.99)\\ \hline +Disc. Fourier Transf. (Spect.)& 0.474 (1.0)& 0.739 (0.99)& 0.012 (1.0)& 0.678 (0.98)& 0.437 (0.99)\\ \hline +Unoverlapping Templ. Match.*& 0.505 (0.990)& 0.521 (0.990)& 0.510 (0.989)& 0.511 (0.990)& 0.499 (0.990)\\ \hline +Overlapping Temp. Match.& 0.574 (0.98)& 0.304 (0.99)& 0.437 (0.97)& 0.759 (0.98)& 0.275 (0.99)\\ \hline +Maurer's Universal Statistical& 0.759 (0.96)& 0.699 (0.97)& 0.191 (0.98)& 0.699 (1.0)& 0.798 (0.97)\\ \hline +Approximate Entropy (m=10)& 0.759 (0.99)& 0.162 (0.99)& 0.867 (0.99)& 0.534 (1.0)& 0.616 (0.99)\\ \hline +Random Excursions *& 0.666 (0.994)& 0.410 (0.962)& 0.287 (0.998)& 0.365 (0.994)& 0.480 (0.985)\\ \hline +Random Excursions Variant *& 0.337 (0.988)& 0.519 (0.984)& 0.549 (0.994)& 0.225 (0.995)& 0.533 (0.993)\\ \hline +Serial* (m=10)& 0.630 (0.99)& 0.529 (0.99)& 0.460 (0.99)& 0.302 (0.995)& 0.360 (0.985)\\ \hline +Linear Complexity& 0.719 (1.0)& 0.739 (0.99)& 0.759 (0.98)& 0.122 (0.97)& 0.514 (0.99)\\ \hline +\end{tabular} \end{scriptsize} \end{center} \caption{NIST SP 800-22 test results ($\mathbb{P}_T$)}