modif des subsubsection

[rce2015.git] / paper.tex

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 1fdc62bbe39f1bac97fac168282818107e6b9e58..3c38513a2d0f46ac1f1a4ae4dc21c157e9c4bdd5 100644 (file)
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -550,8 +550,7 @@ Grid architecture                       & 2$\times$16, 4$\times$8, 4$\times$16 a
 \end{table}
 
 \subsubsection{Simulations for various grid architectures and scaling-up matrix sizes}
 \end{table}
 
 \subsubsection{Simulations for various grid architectures and scaling-up matrix sizes}

-\  \\
-% environment
+

 In  this  section,  we  analyze   the  simulations  conducted  on  various  grid
 configurations and for different sizes of the 3D Poisson problem. The parameters
 of    the    network    between    clusters    is    fixed    to    $N2$    (see
 In  this  section,  we  analyze   the  simulations  conducted  on  various  grid
 configurations and for different sizes of the 3D Poisson problem. The parameters
 of    the    network    between    clusters    is    fixed    to    $N2$    (see


@@ -611,7 +610,7 @@ the  network speed  drops down (variation of 12.5\%), the  difference between  t
 
 
 \subsubsection{Network latency impacts on performance}
 
 
 \subsubsection{Network latency impacts on performance}

-\ \\
+

 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }
 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }


@@ -639,11 +638,11 @@ network  latency  from  $8.10^{-6}$  to $6.10^{-5}$  implies  an  absolute  time
 increase of more than $75\%$ (resp.   $82\%$) of the execution for the classical
 GMRES  (resp.   Krylov  multisplitting)  algorithm. The  execution  time  factor
 between the two algorithms  varies from 2.2 to 1.5 times  with a network latency
 increase of more than $75\%$ (resp.   $82\%$) of the execution for the classical
 GMRES  (resp.   Krylov  multisplitting)  algorithm. The  execution  time  factor
 between the two algorithms  varies from 2.2 to 1.5 times  with a network latency

-decreasing from $8.10^{-6}$ to $6.10^{-5}$.
+decreasing from $8.10^{-6}$ to $6.10^{-5}$ second.

 
 
 \subsubsection{Network bandwidth impacts on performance}
 
 
 \subsubsection{Network bandwidth impacts on performance}

-\ \\
+

 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }
 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }


@@ -676,7 +675,7 @@ presents a better  performance in the considered bandwidth interval  with a gain
 of $40\%$ which is only around $24\%$ for the classical GMRES.
 
 \subsubsection{Input matrix size impacts on performance}
 of $40\%$ which is only around $24\%$ for the classical GMRES.
 
 \subsubsection{Input matrix size impacts on performance}

-\ \\
+

 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }
 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }


@@ -712,7 +711,8 @@ targeted environment for the application deployment when focusing on the problem
 size scale up.  It  should be noticed that the same test has  been done with the
 grid 4 $\times$ 8 leading to the same conclusion.
 
 size scale up.  It  should be noticed that the same test has  been done with the
 grid 4 $\times$ 8 leading to the same conclusion.
 

-\subsubsection{CPU Power impacts on performance}
+\subsubsection{CPU Power impacts on performance\\}
+

 
 \begin{table} [htbp]
 \centering
 
 \begin{table} [htbp]
 \centering